Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Economist Calls Housing Boom 'Biggest Bubble in History'
NewsMax ^ | 6/24/05 | Jim Myers

Posted on 06/24/2005 10:55:45 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2005 10:55:46 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I think the bubble just exploded yesterday.


3 posted on 06/24/2005 10:58:28 AM PDT by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
# In California, 60 percent of all new mortgages this year are interest-only or negative-amortization. These loans are gambles that prices will continue to rise.

That's all you needed to know. These people are going to lose their shirts.

4 posted on 06/24/2005 11:00:12 AM PDT by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection; mizmoutarde; shekkian

Ohhhhhhh, I like bubbles.

5 posted on 06/24/2005 11:00:20 AM PDT by Enterprise (Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

What I don't understand about all this is that if housing is such a great investment it should attract more developers which should eventually result in making it a buyers market. How come this is not happening?


6 posted on 06/24/2005 11:00:41 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shekkian

my thoughts exactly.

Time to refresh the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants (and Patriots, unfortunately...)" - T. Jefferson... if he were alive today


7 posted on 06/24/2005 11:04:17 AM PDT by CGVet58 (God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

Zoning laws retard construction and supply growth.


8 posted on 06/24/2005 11:04:47 AM PDT by Boston Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I remember saying in the early 80's farmland may stop inflating but will never go down in value. BOOM, it retraced to 1/3 of the high very quickly when it happened and within a few years was up to 2/3rds of the high. Now it is at or above the high again.

Housing, who knows? Most soothsayers should be shot on sight.


9 posted on 06/24/2005 11:04:58 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

One clear indication that residential real estate is overvalued is the relationship between home prices and rents.


CAn't remember the talk show guy from florida but his rule of thumb was that the monthly rent should be 1% of the value of the property.


10 posted on 06/24/2005 11:06:52 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

So is it bad when rent is higher or lower than that 1% figure?


11 posted on 06/24/2005 11:08:26 AM PDT by RockinRight (Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Boston Capitalist

No, Zoning laws make sure that growth is orderly so that residents have a good quality of life.

Zoning is what keeps that industrial concern from building a plant next door to your $600,000 home.


12 posted on 06/24/2005 11:11:20 AM PDT by AzaleaCity5691 (The enemy lies in the heart of Gadsden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

And that is based on a mortgage at what interest rate for the landlord?


13 posted on 06/24/2005 11:12:34 AM PDT by UseYourHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

interest rates are low.


14 posted on 06/24/2005 11:13:19 AM PDT by Porterville (Don't make me go Bushi on your a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley
We do have a record number of new home building here in florida. florida is a bit different then the rest of the US, as the 72m baby-boomers retire and many move to florida for the lack of income tax and warm weather. home prices will drop in some areas as the number of homes increase... but, the homes built on finite land (like beach front, water front, prestigious golf courses) will continue to increase in price as demand increases.

Florida real estate will also be held in check with retirement savings and investments made over a lifetime. In other parts of the country, where the median age is in the 30s, the local real estate is supported via income and investments. Once investments dry up, wages will be all they have to handle the monthly. The problem is, as outsourcing continues and more and more people are forced into other fields to compensate, wages in those fields drop. This will promote more bankruptcies and foreclosures as the people are unable to find work sufficient to cover their expenses, which were geared to the previous higher wages. This has already been seen in Colorado, parts of California, and No. VA.

15 posted on 06/24/2005 11:13:33 AM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AzaleaCity5691

First zoning laws were instituted in NYC after Equitable Life built a hideous headquarters in downtown Manhattan. The building, still standing today, is probably the second ugliest in the city.


16 posted on 06/24/2005 11:13:57 AM PDT by durasell (Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Buy at the beach,political and geographical limited resources... including natural moratoriums from the water table.
17 posted on 06/24/2005 11:16:18 AM PDT by Porterville (Don't make me go Bushi on your a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
There is no housing bubble, nothing to see here. Move on.
18 posted on 06/24/2005 11:17:16 AM PDT by austinite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UseYourHead

It is a quick rule of thumb, after that, get you calculators out. If rental income is $1,000 a month, you would pay $100,000 for the property. Has worked well for me for quick analysis.


19 posted on 06/24/2005 11:17:57 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
It's bad for owners when rent is lower than that figure. If I own a million dollar house, I should be able to get $10,000/month in rent for it - I'll need $6,000 or so just to cover the mortgage, taxes, insurance, and maintenance.

Million dollar condos in my area are renting as low as $2,700 a month.

So either massive increases in rent are due (which won't happen, because owners can hardly find tenants even at $2,700) or the value of the property needs a radical adjustment downward. Which it will get as soon as all of these 105% mortgages, interest-only mortgages, and other risky schemes get torpedoed by rising interest rates, and no one can afford to fake their way into a million-dollar home they can't objectively afford.

20 posted on 06/24/2005 11:18:23 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson