Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terri Schiavo Autopsy: Manner of Death 'Undetermined'
CNSNews.com ^ | June 15, 2005 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 06/15/2005 12:27:19 PM PDT by veronica

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 861-879 next last
To: ClancyJ

"We calls em as we sees em."

back at ya


541 posted on 06/15/2005 10:53:47 PM PDT by bonfire (dwindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ

FGS clancyj. That is a hysterical and irresponsible post. I am married to a medical doctor and every doctor I know takes his oath seriously. My husband changed his specialty right before Roe v Wade because he couldn't stand the thought of abortions and he damn well would have NEVER performed one.



542 posted on 06/15/2005 10:54:28 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies]

To: Selkie

Well, that was a good reason to sign up. Afterall, Kerry did "suck". LOL

What I still don't understand though is why you posted "blueblazes" sign up date. No biggy, I was just curious.


543 posted on 06/15/2005 10:54:34 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ

So there's more than one of you? Good to know.


544 posted on 06/15/2005 10:57:37 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: Chena

To save people the headache of debating someone who may just be passing thru FR as a one trick pony.


545 posted on 06/15/2005 10:58:14 PM PDT by Selkie (Quality of life is just as important as the quantity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]

To: Chena; All

http://www.freerepublic.com/~blueblazes/

This account has been banned or suspended.>>>>>



Yawn. Called it. Nitey night.


546 posted on 06/15/2005 11:00:10 PM PDT by Selkie (Quality of life is just as important as the quantity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]

To: onyx
" I am married to a medical doctor and every doctor I know takes his oath seriously. My husband changed his specialty right before Roe v Wade because he couldn't stand the thought of abortions and he damn well would have NEVER performed one."

Well he did, but how many others didn't change their speciality? There are a number of others, I think, onyx.

Now that I think about it, I think I know a number of doctors in my community that were known to do abortions.....

547 posted on 06/15/2005 11:01:55 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ

Your hunch was wrong, in this instance. Try again.


548 posted on 06/15/2005 11:03:54 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. "--Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter; ClancyJ

I'm sure he's one of the few who changed specialties, but he's a devout Catholic and a doctor who truly lives by "first do no harm." Not all OB-GYN's perform abortions. OB-GYN used to be a a happy specialty for the better part. Husband never lost a baby or a mommy.

Now clancyj's irresponsible post painted doctors with a mighty broad brush and that's not accurate.


549 posted on 06/15/2005 11:05:38 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies]

To: Selkie; All

"http://www.freerepublic.com/~blueblazes/

This account has been banned or suspended.>>>>> "


I know I've been working too many long hours out in the sun so maybe I'm a victim of sunstroke, but I sure don't know what just happened on this thread to that "blueblazes" person. This person was banned or suspended and I don't understand why that happened. How can someone be a "one trick pony" if they've been posting for a month? And how do we know they wouldn't have hung around and posted on more threads in the future if they are banned or suspended?

Scratching my sunburned head here. :)


550 posted on 06/15/2005 11:09:28 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Ignore, onyx. Not worth the waste of time and energy.


551 posted on 06/15/2005 11:10:16 PM PDT by bonfire (dwindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I was talking in generalities my dear. Of course, I am not saying all doctors.

I hope that the word gets out of what such actions will do to their profession and their salaries. Same for nursing homes, the health care industry, medical home care.

I have a feeling the universities being ultra liberal are instigating bioethics departments (of course, promoting and covering up that they are promoting euthanasia as a solution to society expenses).

These departments teach their views and the graduates go on into the medical profession and with specialties in bioethics, they, of course, will end up on end-of-life panels making recommendations.

What does the legislature do when they have to make laws concerning end-of-life decisions for how to handle civil rights situations? They will naturally turn to experts. They will seek out end-of-life panels to make recommendations (same as is coming up this year with the president).

So, we see the creeping spread of the liberal socialistic teaching of the bioethics departments through our governments laws, into the medical profession and into the killing of our citizens.

This is how the nazis started their "elimination" process - by killing those weak, the deformed, etc.

This is a theory and I hope it is wrong but I'm looking and wondering.

I have already seen end-of-life panel recommendations being presented to the medical specialties associations and they were to review and adjust or accept.

I just feel the public needs to look at exactly what is going on. Maybe their true goals are those as stated - or, maybe they also cover those goals with appropriate pleasing rhetoric to make them acceptable.


552 posted on 06/15/2005 11:10:23 PM PDT by ClancyJ (McCain: "As far as the criticism is concerned, none of us care about public opinion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies]

To: Chena

I'm scratchin' too. Maybe he/she posted something offensive on another thread that we are unaware of??


553 posted on 06/15/2005 11:11:32 PM PDT by bonfire (dwindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: Chena; bonfire

He was likely someone who has previously been banned and moderators decided he deserves to stay so.


554 posted on 06/15/2005 11:14:38 PM PDT by neutrality
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: neutrality

hmmm. could be.


555 posted on 06/15/2005 11:16:39 PM PDT by bonfire (dwindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: onyx
"I'm sure he's one of the few who changed specialties, but he's a devout Catholic and a doctor who truly lives by "first do no harm." Not all OB-GYN's perform abortions. OB-GYN used to be a a happy specialty for the better part. Husband never lost a baby or a mommy"

Good a devout Catholic OB-GYN. I've got a few question about the PILL and research. As much as I've heard on the media about smoking, and drinking and obesity, I've never heard one possible link with oral contraception and cancer. Isn't it amazing that everything on earth is linked to cancer, with the possible exception that women from approx the 1960'w have been taking an contraception, and that has NOT been linked to cancer.

556 posted on 06/15/2005 11:16:58 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies]

To: bonfire

Good point, bonfire. I had looked up that person's previous posts and didn't see anything unusual at all. Just another person posting their opinions like we all do.


557 posted on 06/15/2005 11:17:04 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: Chena

Guess we will never know. Wish the mods would clue us in :)


558 posted on 06/15/2005 11:19:20 PM PDT by bonfire (dwindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: neutrality

I'm sure the mods must have a good reason then. I'd hate to think any FReeper would have the power to personally instigate a banning or suspension by secretly calling in the mods for personal reasons.


559 posted on 06/15/2005 11:20:48 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

I thought the pill was linked to just about everything!

Sure glad I don't have to worry about that stuff anymore. It's great being old:)


560 posted on 06/15/2005 11:21:04 PM PDT by bonfire (dwindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 861-879 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson