Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top 11 Secrets of a National Retail Sales Tax
Various | 6-10-05 | Always Right

Posted on 06/10/2005 11:13:37 AM PDT by Always Right

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840841-860861-880 ... 1,241-1,246 next last
To: Always Right
Defending industries like the auto and homebuilding industry may be in my self-interest, but I also beleive it is neccessary for the future of this county.

You're enslaved to certain distortions in the economy created by the Stupid Tax, and are fearful of freedom.

Find some courage to break the chains and be free, Always Right.

841 posted on 06/12/2005 1:39:49 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Quality of life": Another name for the slippery slope into barbarism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 817 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I thought you said it was SIMPLE??? Why are you throwing around all of those IRS Form numbers??? And sending people to H&R Block or the IRS to do their taxes??

With the FairTax, all of that nonsense goes away.


842 posted on 06/12/2005 1:40:28 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 836 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Are you trying to be funny?

The income tax requires lots of document and government intrusion into the individual. The FairTax eliminates all of that.

The social security program taxes you and maintains records on you now to track your income. (Your benefits are determined by a separate law which can be changed, BTW, to eliminate or change the benefit any time they want.) Those records will still be maintained so that you can collect when you retire.

IF, and ONLY IF, you choose to receive the prebate, will you have to submit your name, address, and the SS numbers of those in your household once a year.

Is that truly the only thing standing in your way -- the choice of words of someone explaining the incredible difference in reporting requirements?

The bill clearly spells out that requirement. Since I find it unlikely that I would register for the prebate, I might commit the horrible sin of saying that there was NO requirement when it is actually quite minimal.

Name, address, SSN.

Even soldiers held captive can give their "name, rank, and serial number' and not violate the oath they took.

Do you know that there are


843 posted on 06/12/2005 1:42:18 PM PDT by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer

You are as demented as pigdog -- or short of valid arguments on the more important stuff. The number 30 (or 29.9, if youlike) is derived from the number 23, which is only an estimate, anyway, so you are obsessing worse than Queeg over the strawberries.


844 posted on 06/12/2005 1:43:13 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
People who push something like NRST with the fanaticism of the FairTaxers are usually looking for power and conquest- my way or die! and "my way" is totalist.

The power sought by the FairTaxers is for a return of the power to the people of the United States.

And the conquest we're looking for is one of the people over the social engineers in Washington, DC.

This is wrong how?

845 posted on 06/12/2005 1:44:53 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Quality of life": Another name for the slippery slope into barbarism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 839 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

Oh, I see - the numnber does not matter, eh??? How about if we use 20% then rather than 23% (or 15%; or 10% ...)??

The conversion from t-i to t-e is a calculation - and it comes out to be 29.87%, not 30 or 30.0 or30.00. The 23% number is the starting point for the calculation and not the other way around. Boosting the t-e artificially as you do is merely more of the dishonestly that permeates the SQL bunch.


846 posted on 06/12/2005 1:46:31 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

You also make the mistake of thinking that EVERY time the doctor provides a service that it is fully taxable. It isn't.

If the patient has insurance, tax has been paid on that insurance and services provided under that insurance are not taxable, only the co-payment or deductible.


847 posted on 06/12/2005 1:47:44 PM PDT by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

'Preciate your concern ... and I'm NOT Your Lord!!


848 posted on 06/12/2005 1:47:51 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 840 | View Replies]

To: Radioactive

Such a wunnerful idea. Why don't you send it to the President's Tax Panel?


849 posted on 06/12/2005 1:50:12 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 803 | View Replies]

To: pigdog

You guys are incredible! 30 is 29.87 rounded to the nearest integer and perfectly correct. Getting 20,15, or 10 from 29.87 is just outright cheating -- which says something about your other arguments, I think.


850 posted on 06/12/2005 1:51:19 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 846 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice."

-Barry Goldwater

851 posted on 06/12/2005 1:52:23 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Quality of life": Another name for the slippery slope into barbarism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 839 | View Replies]

To: pigdog

No, you certainly are not.


852 posted on 06/12/2005 1:52:54 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 848 | View Replies]

To: Badray

Are you saying my health insurance premiums are going to have 30% (or 29.87%) added on? This is not something the FT fanatics talk about too loudly.


853 posted on 06/12/2005 1:57:31 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 847 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
When you persist in arguing about the percentage of the tax rate, all you're doing is continuing to ignore the simple fact that the level of the rate is not a commentary on HOW you collect taxes, anyway.

It is a commentary on the level of government SPENDING.

The only thing you end up repeatedly doing is arguing against the means to make that level of excessive SPENDING as VISIBLE to the American people as is possible.

854 posted on 06/12/2005 1:58:36 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Quality of life": Another name for the slippery slope into barbarism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Mirroring the FairTax would lower the states rates by broadening the base. It would also make their tax system transparent and simple and fair.

That's a good thing.


855 posted on 06/12/2005 2:00:04 PM PDT by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
When you persist in arguing about the percentage of the tax rate...

LOL! What's this "you" crap? It's piggy and the ancient one who are arguing that it is 29.87% and not 30%. I'm just falling out of my chair laughing at them!

856 posted on 06/12/2005 2:01:51 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I think that greater visibility of the tax burden is a good thing (withhlding could be the worse thing that hapened to the country), but I can't stomach the BS that is sprayedd around by the acolytes of the Fair Tax proposal.


857 posted on 06/12/2005 2:05:25 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I think that greater visibility of the tax burden is a good thing (withholding could be the worse thing that hapened to the country), but I can't stomach the BS that is sprayed around by the acolytes of the Fair Tax proposal.


858 posted on 06/12/2005 2:06:42 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
I do not like the prospects of building and selling houses with a 30% tax added on the price

You already do.

... especially when I know there is no way in hell I can reduce my prices more than 10%.

And your drywall guys can, and your framers can, and your lumber yard can, etc. So there will be enough room to reduce prices so that the nrst brings prices back to where they are today. In fact, because there are SO many links in the production chain of a new home, it is likely that this industry will enjoy one of the bigger cost savings.

Competing against existing homes that will be 20% cheaper will kill the new home industry.

What makes you think existing homes will be cheaper? The sellers of the existing homes are going to recover all their costs - including the taxes and tax costs they paid when they purchased the home.

Just because no tax is paid to the feds, they seller is dang sure gonna charge whatever he needs in order to recover his costs! (excepting distressed sales).

Good grief I can't believe you're this dense.

859 posted on 06/12/2005 2:07:34 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
I think that greater visibility of the tax burden is a good thing

Then you should support the only plan on the table that brings the entire tax burden out in the open, and to one place...the point of retail sale.

Nothing else even comes close.

860 posted on 06/12/2005 2:09:55 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Quality of life": Another name for the slippery slope into barbarism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 821-840841-860861-880 ... 1,241-1,246 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson