Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to prosecute the Free Republic vandal outright. (Vanity)
today | By Lazamataz

Posted on 05/09/2005 5:54:33 AM PDT by Lazamataz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 1,401-1,415 next last
To: rdb3

Has Jim Robinson given us any of his thoughts on this? I'm just wondering.


201 posted on 05/09/2005 6:32:20 AM PDT by sageb1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I have a strong suspicion that he used to be one of our own who posted here for awhile and was banned.

I would almost bet money on it.
202 posted on 05/09/2005 6:32:29 AM PDT by Skooz (Jesus Christ Set Me Free of Drug Addiction in 1985. Thank You, Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Final Authority
He probably uses a random IP generator.

Never heard of such an animal. One needs an IP to receive back information when you do an HTTP GET or HTTP POST. Without a true IP (ie, a random one), your information will never get back to you.

203 posted on 05/09/2005 6:32:53 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; JennieOsborne; /\XABN584; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 1Peter2:16; ...

BTTT !

Track and Prosecute James54

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/user-posts?name=James54

David


204 posted on 05/09/2005 6:33:11 AM PDT by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
This merely demonstrates how sick homosexuals really are and why most are only a step away from pedophilia or child rape. Most people have been duped into thinking that the Will and Grace show represents the homosexual world--this filthy degenerate posting is closer to the truth.

There's nothing in that moron's post to indicate that he's gay or anything else. He posts offensive pictures. Period. He makes racist statements. Period.

Please don't hijack this into some sort of crusade against gays.

It serves no one and detracts from the actual message -- getting rid of this particular offensive individual.

205 posted on 05/09/2005 6:33:12 AM PDT by mhking ("Today, we're gonna do things the RIGHT way...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
I haven't seen the pics today, but I can make a guess, based on last time. "Tubgirl?"

Yep.

206 posted on 05/09/2005 6:33:39 AM PDT by mhking ("Today, we're gonna do things the RIGHT way...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Did anyone else experience an automatic redirect to some Spanish speaking website?

Run a virus/trojan check to make sure a trojan or keylogger was not loaded on your machine!!!!!

207 posted on 05/09/2005 6:34:02 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

I'm just posting meaningless replies to folks now so these will scroll off my ping page.


208 posted on 05/09/2005 6:34:08 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez was't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

Thanks. Just replying for the sake of getting these scrolled off my ping page.


209 posted on 05/09/2005 6:34:37 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez was't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: jude24
" ... this is a political website. His comments were, at their core, political, if offensive. It's my understanding that political speech is particularly protected by the First Amendment, and broad latitude is given to the speaker."

I have seen words to that effect, in this thread, by others.


I may be naive, but I cannot believe any jury could be cajoled into believing that post was political in content. Whether it could ever get to that state (trial) is quite another thing.

210 posted on 05/09/2005 6:34:37 AM PDT by G.Mason ( Because Free Republic obviously needed another opinionated big mouth ... Proud NRA member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
There are anonymous proxy servers listed

Can we not use these lists or some internal property of said server to deny access by anonymous and high-anonymous proxy servers?

211 posted on 05/09/2005 6:34:40 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

What about internet bullying/harassment laws?


212 posted on 05/09/2005 6:34:52 AM PDT by RushCrush (Next thing you know Bill Clinton will be advocating celibacy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

Let me do my part to help.


213 posted on 05/09/2005 6:34:52 AM PDT by Skooz (Jesus Christ Set Me Free of Drug Addiction in 1985. Thank You, Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
One possibility would be to allow any user to temporarily delete any < img src=""> post via the abuse button, pending expedited review by the AM. I know that this would be an impediment on the free exchange of ideas, and people could abuse this privilege, but the cure is better than the disease, IMHO.

Also, if the AM decides that somebody has been maliciously abusing this privilege, that account could be suspended, as well.

If we all had this ability, these posts would last a matter of seconds. I have no problem punching the [ABUSE] button when something pisses me off!
214 posted on 05/09/2005 6:35:08 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

Just click 'brief'. you don't have to have your page on 'full'


215 posted on 05/09/2005 6:35:30 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne

I saw one of the posts. It was horrific!


216 posted on 05/09/2005 6:35:41 AM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Skooz

I'd be willing to bet this is the same troll who used to screw up threads with scrolling marquis. I think that was a couple of years ago.


217 posted on 05/09/2005 6:35:54 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (you can be whoever you want to be on the Internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
I have a strong suspicion that he used to be one of our own who posted here for awhile and was banned. I would almost bet money on it.

That would merely make my pursuit of his prosecution a little more vigorous.

218 posted on 05/09/2005 6:35:58 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: jude24
the issue is whether he did anything for which he may be prosecuted.

Harassment would probably be a civil action, but I'm sure he could get nailed on federal hate speech/crime statutes.

219 posted on 05/09/2005 6:36:08 AM PDT by mhking ("Today, we're gonna do things the RIGHT way...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana

I am glad I was not on it's ping list.


220 posted on 05/09/2005 6:36:21 AM PDT by Skooz (Jesus Christ Set Me Free of Drug Addiction in 1985. Thank You, Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 1,401-1,415 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson