Posted on 04/24/2005 9:41:55 AM PDT by AVNevis
Just hired?
The facts belie you. Had the CAGOP leadership given him even reasonable support, OR had they NOT sabotaged Bill Simon's campaign, McClintock would be controller today.
| Candidate | Votes | Pct. | Spent ($MM) |
| Steve Westly | Moderate Democrat | 45.4 | $10.6 |
| Tom McClintock | Conservative Republican | 45.1 | $2.0 |
| Result? The conservative got no support from the GOP, was outspent 5:1 by a moderate Democrat, and nearly won anyway. |
|||
| Candidate | Votes | Vote Pct. | Spent ($MM) |
| Cruz M. Bustamante | Leftist Democrat | 49.5 | $4.6 |
| Bruce Mc Pherson | Moderate Republican | 41.8 | $2.8 |
| Result? The “moderate” Republican darling of the GOP got lots of support, was outspent only 1.6:1 by an extreme leftist with no credibility, the "electable" GOP "moderate" LOST by a margin NINE TIMES larger than the unsupported conservative in the same election. So much for "moderates are more electable in California." |
|||
>>Some of the more logical voters went for Arnold.
And what did that get you? A bunch of leftists appointed to high positions, communistic conservancies, more debt, higher spending, unaffordable stem cell research. And just wait for the additional borrowing in his "spending reform", taxpayer funded solar energy mandates, increased toll roads, etc.
I voted for a conservative. You voted for a Trojan Horse.
If these folks had a single conservative bone in their body, the would be supporting him for Lt. Governor. It looks like they want Garamendi in office.
I'm sick and tired of the old canard that conservatives can't win.
The "moderates" (Republican socialists) said the same thing about Reagan, both when he ran for Governor of California and when he ran for President.
Good post by the way. The only problem with it, was that Bustamante I think was the incumbent, which counts for a lot in down ballot races.
Indeed, the only substantive barrier he faces is sabotage from the liberal wing of his own Party, such as we have seen here.
Well I thought I had the monopoly on "liberal" Republicanism around here. I don't think that is it. I am not sure what it is. Maybe it is the cult of the Arnold personality or something.
With the 'rookie' bendover performance of the Gub so far, you'd have to ask who has screwed the CA GOP worse than anyone, but let's not sweat the details, let's just hurl invective , especially at the conservative base of the GOP.. real nice touch, CBG.
And you couldn't resist slandering someone just for its sake alone.
Running for Lt. Governor is wacky?
Some people never learn.
And others just pimp unelectables so Dems continue to rule California.
That's exactly what Norm and his posse do. The Red Sox finally won a world series - that's all his crew needs to keep going.
It's the candidate and his supporters that are wacky.
Go Cubs Go
"And others just pimp unelectables so Dems continue to rule California."
See post 102.
There's a difference: You are a "liberal" for honest ideological reasons (with which I differ but can at least understand). You are at least willing to consider other perspectives. The people to which I refer are "liberal" to be easing the greasing on both sides of the aisle, for purely practical reasons. They call themselves "moderates" because they want access to whomever is in power, they want government to be able to deliver on political favors, but they call themselves "conservatives" because they don't want to pay taxes either. Methinks you know the type.
Horseshoes and Handgrenades come to mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.