Skip to comments.
Skeleton find could tell us more about the Roman way of death
Yorkshire Post ^
| 15 April 2005
| Paul Jeeves
Posted on 04/16/2005 5:11:11 PM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: nickcarraway
Why don`t they do an archaeological dig in Hitlerys closet? There`s more skeletons in that thing than Jeffrey Dahmer on a binge.
2
posted on
04/16/2005 5:17:16 PM PDT
by
Imaverygooddriver
(ALL YOU BASE ARE BELONG TO US)
To: nickcarraway
Seems fairly straightforward. It looks as though these people were executed by decapitation. I don't think the fact that some of them were killed by a clean slice necessarily means that the bodies were dead when the head was cut off; rather, it just means that the body was stabilized, as on a headsman's block, before the blow.
3
posted on
04/16/2005 5:24:03 PM PDT
by
Capriole
(I don't have any problems that couldn't be solved by more chocolate or more ammunition)
To: nickcarraway
Why bury a body in shackles? They must have been pretty expensive items at the time and it's not like the headless corpse was going to escape!
4
posted on
04/16/2005 5:42:31 PM PDT
by
Grut
To: Grut
5
posted on
04/16/2005 5:47:42 PM PDT
by
spetznaz
(Nuclear tipped ICBMs: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol.)
To: nickcarraway
"It is thought the Romans could have beheaded corpses to release the human spirit, which they believed was contained in the head. "
Much like the ZULUs who sliced open the belly for the same reason.
To: nickcarraway
To: msdrby
8
posted on
04/16/2005 7:01:32 PM PDT
by
Professional Engineer
(Themeless Thursday is different from the other six themeless days how?)
To: Capriole
Sounds like they just uncovered the Convicts' Yard burial ground.
Sort of what they'll find if they ever dig up the cemetery near Newgate Prison.
9
posted on
04/16/2005 7:11:06 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: nickcarraway
Soooo, they had head hunters back then too?
To: nickcarraway
Good evening.
"There can be only one."
Michael Frazier
11
posted on
04/16/2005 7:31:22 PM PDT
by
brazzaville
(No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
To: nickcarraway
I was under the impression that the Romans cremated their dead-thus the excitement over the skeletons found at Heraclitum(?) from the Vesuvius eruption. I know they've found mummies in Roman Egypt, but are they Roman skeletons in England? Or British slaves?
12
posted on
04/16/2005 7:35:45 PM PDT
by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: Canticle_of_Deborah; SunkenCiv; blam; Fiddlstix
13
posted on
04/16/2005 8:26:53 PM PDT
by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: nickcarraway; lepton; blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; ...
Thanks nick. Welcome lepton. Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
14
posted on
04/16/2005 8:46:44 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(FR profiled updated Monday, April 11, 2005. Fewer graphics, faster loading.)
To: nickcarraway
Two puncture wounds to the neck.
Beheaded; shackled in the grave.
Sounds like some of the Transylvanian auxilliaries knew what they were doing.
LEAVE HIM ALONE!
15
posted on
04/16/2005 9:10:19 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
To: PzLdr
the Romans cremated their dead Yes they did. If these were Brits or criminals, maybe the Romans believed that they didn't merit cremation. The DNA studies would be interesting.
The article doesn't say if they found the skulls. Were they placed elsewhere? And why kids? Have we ever found a Roman cemetery filled with beheaded before this? Was this a punishment for something? It's pretty intriguing.
I got to spend some time in York a few years ago. It's a truly fascinating city.
16
posted on
04/16/2005 9:16:17 PM PDT
by
lizma
To: Grut
Why bury a body in shackles? That is interesting. Chains were to restrain the body so it didn't come back, and the head was removed so even if the body came back it wouldn't be able to navigate accurately. There was a lot going on with bodies, they didn't cease all function and they didn't have the modern juridical State to declare them dead.
17
posted on
04/16/2005 10:16:15 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(50 trillion sovereign cells working together in relative harmony)
To: lizma
I know the Celts took heads as trophies. Roman prisoners? But why were the heads with the bodies?
18
posted on
04/17/2005 4:28:16 AM PDT
by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: nickcarraway
19
posted on
04/17/2005 1:41:04 PM PDT
by
-=Wing_0_Walker=-
(Don't spit in my eye and charge me for eyewash!)
To: brazzaville
There can be only one. LOL!
20
posted on
04/17/2005 7:36:58 PM PDT
by
Ciexyz
(Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson