If the jury believes this testimny, Michael Jackson is toast!
1 posted on
04/07/2005 12:25:47 PM PDT by
ex-Texan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: ex-Texan
40 posted on
04/07/2005 12:57:48 PM PDT by
Asphalt
(Three can keep a secret if two are dead.)
To: ex-Texan
"I was thinking, 'what's going on in there? Grown man in the shower with a boy' ... it wasn't right," he told trial jurors, who could jail Jackson for up to 20 years if he is convicted in the present case against him. Begs the question: why didn't he do something about it then, to spare the boy the humiliation/crime/assault?
To: ex-Texan
That's ignornat. He's just ignorant.
51 posted on
04/07/2005 1:15:25 PM PDT by
SengirV
To: ex-Texan
so will the jury members laugh about this, as they did about the other kid's testimony?
55 posted on
04/07/2005 1:18:50 PM PDT by
ken21
( people die + then you don't hear from them again. /s)
To: ex-Texan
I can't stand this guy, but I haven't seen anything compelling that says he's guilty either. Not yet, at least.
To: ex-Texan
Word from Fox News was that their court watchers thought the trial was going against Michael. Then yesterday, there was the report that jurors were making fun of testimony, which was good for Michael.
Wonder how Michael's defense lawyer is going to tear apart this one? After all, what can he say he saw instead of what he knew he saw?
66 posted on
04/07/2005 1:42:24 PM PDT by
MHT
To: ex-Texan
This is such horsesh*t. Everyone who sees a future cameo for themselves on Access Hollywood is coming out with every fish story you can imagine. It's all bunk. He will be acquitted. They should throw the Mother in prison.
To: ex-Texan
Jacko's problem is that his attorneys did a really good job of imepeaching the prosecution's prime witness and closely realted parties, yet that testimony on direct remains on the record and in the jurors' minds. Their problem is deciding whether or not to believe it. All of this evidence of prior bad acts with other boys powerfully undermines the effects of what was a very good cross examination and enhances the credibility of the complaining witness. I'm beginning to think Jaco will loose.
To: ex-Texan
I think that M Jackson is guilty as sin, but I believe that he will walk. Too many issues with the prosecution witnesses.
76 posted on
04/07/2005 2:15:49 PM PDT by
Dave278
To: ex-Texan
but geraldo says MJ is innocent. so he must be innocent, right? I mean, Geraldo cant be wrong.
78 posted on
04/07/2005 2:18:45 PM PDT by
isom35
To: ex-Texan
Oral sex ain't sex....just ask Bill "Fellatio" Clinton.
82 posted on
04/07/2005 2:36:33 PM PDT by
JarheadFromFlorida
(Ooorahhhh........Get Some! Semper Fi')
To: ex-Texan
Michael Jackson will be whisked off to Marlon Brando's island in the dark of night, (even without a passport), never to set foot in the US again.
83 posted on
04/07/2005 2:38:14 PM PDT by
JarheadFromFlorida
(Ooorahhhh........Get Some! Semper Fi')
To: ex-Texan
I would have thought that jackson would have had hidden video cameras set up to tape his activities with the boys. but no hints of that or pictures yet?
99 posted on
04/08/2005 12:10:05 AM PDT by
isom35
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson