Skip to comments.
Evolution's many incongruities
TECHNICIAN ^
| 03.31.2005
| Daniel Underwood
Posted on 04/01/2005 3:20:04 PM PST by Heartlander
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
To: Heartlander
If you don't like my answer, let's hear yours.
You say evolution is bunk? Fine. How did humanity and all other bilogical life arrive on this planet (skip Big Bang theory; it has nothing to do with evolution)?
To: Dennis Mosher
You say evolution is bunk? I don’t say evolution is bunk.
Fine. How did humanity and all other bilogical life arrive on this planet (skip Big Bang theory; it has nothing to do with evolution)?
From intelligence rather than mindlessness….Now please let me state that evolution and design theory are compatible. It could be front loaded intelligence as you suggested, but it would still be designed.
To: bondserv
You are well aware that the Discovery Channel and NOVA -- that many ignorant parents let their children watch -- ties together cosmic evolution and life's evolution. Many a school textbook -- that many a ignorant parent sends the children to -- does the same. They say many other speculative things as if they are fact, that make me laugh at the state of our scientific establishment, regularly. Are you claiming that Heartlander is a child?
43
posted on
04/01/2005 6:27:11 PM PST
by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
To: Heartlander
44
posted on
04/01/2005 6:30:35 PM PST
by
RaceBannon
((Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
To: Heartlander
= as there are great scientific minds on both sides of the debate - Name 3 on the Creationist side.
45
posted on
04/01/2005 6:33:12 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(Here to help)
To: Heartlander
For all of the usual gaseous verbiage on evolution threads, the question remains. It's a simple question. I'm sure the advanced minds of modern science can quite easily account for it.
The question is: What accounts for "the matter, energy and finely tuned physical constants necessary for the "big bang?"
Let me profer a guess. The advanced scientific minds haven't a damn thing to say.
To: Reactionary
Make that "proffer." I want to be an advanced scientific mind, too. :)
To: Oztrich Boy
To: bondserv
You are well aware that the Discovery Channel and NOVA -- that many ignorant parents let their children watch -- ties together cosmic evolution and life's evolution. Even if this were so, the C side regulars on these threads should know better.
To: Oztrich Boy
To: RightWingNilla
Are you willing to concede that evolution played no part in OOL?
It makes OOL a little difficult to explain…
To: Heartlander
Are you willing to concede that evolution played no part in OOL? TOE does NOT include abiogenesis either, if that is what youre asking.
To: guitarist
All
1. Dead
2. Notable for making no significant comment on evolution (or "Darwinism")
53
posted on
04/02/2005 3:50:44 AM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(Here to help)
To: Oztrich Boy
You asked for 3, and I gave 'em.
To: Oztrich Boy
To: guitarist
You asked for 3, and I gave 'em. Yeah. But when the argument is "there are great scientific minds on both sides of the [current]debate - ", a couple of guys who died 400 years ago is not exactly a clincher.
56
posted on
04/02/2005 6:58:50 AM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(Here to help)
To: guitarist
I suppose they are all hacks?
57
posted on
04/02/2005 7:12:52 AM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(Most "scientists" are bottle washers and button sorters. - Lazarus Long)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson