Skip to comments.
Gonzales Goes Missing
American Spectator ^
| 03/28/05
| The Prowler
Posted on 03/29/2005 3:30:56 PM PST by ninenot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: hispanichoosier
If you really think that the locals would choose to shoot it out with the USMarshal, or the Marines, you need your Prozac.
61
posted on
03/29/2005 6:41:54 PM PST
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: ninenot
If you really think that the locals would choose to shoot it out with the USMarshal, or the Marines, you need your Prozac.
Not choose, but who knows what happens when tempers are high and all parties are operating on little sleep?
To: hispanichoosier
Please spare me the hysteria. You expect me to believe that local law enforcement officers would fight to prevent execution of a summons?
63
posted on
03/29/2005 7:32:57 PM PST
by
edsheppa
To: ninenot
OK...show of hands. Who didn't see this coming?
64
posted on
03/29/2005 7:34:31 PM PST
by
B Knotts
To: hispanichoosier
Nothing would have happened. Cops have an IQ too. And they don't shoot at one another.
65
posted on
03/29/2005 7:38:22 PM PST
by
international american
(Tagline now fireproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
To: edsheppa
So, allowing the rule of the gun--whether a shootout occurred or local law enforcement backed down--is okay in America now?
To: ninenot
"Most of us recall that Gonzales was no hero on the life issues during his term as a Texas judge."
What an understatement. He was a screeching, screaming, howling pro-abort.
To: hispanichoosier
Don't put words in my mouth. What's OK in America is the rule of law. Local law enforcement would not oppose federal officials executing a legal summons to appear before congress.
68
posted on
03/29/2005 11:44:44 PM PST
by
edsheppa
To: edsheppa
And before I forget, to tie this back to the article, why didn't AG Gonzales send a top team to make arguments in the case?First, I didn't realize that the US government's role was to act as an advocate for specific private plaintiffs in civil cases. Where in the Constitution do you find that?
Second, a top team volunteered to help the Schindlers. They turned them down flat.
69
posted on
03/30/2005 4:15:21 AM PST
by
Poohbah
(If it's called "collateral damage," how come I can't use it to secure a loan?)
To: econ_grad
There's probably a Christian Identity website where they'd love your comment.
To: ninenot
Excuse me but I seem to remember a few of you Freepers complaining about the prolife Freepers complaints about the new AG. We can see what your opinions were worth.
To: Mark in the Old South
Excuse me, but I never endorsed Gonzales. NEVER.
I was well aware of his shortcomings (I do subscribe to Human Events...)
72
posted on
03/30/2005 6:16:01 AM PST
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: Poohbah; Dog Gone; Long Cut; Howlin
They just have to be typed up by someone... :)
73
posted on
03/30/2005 7:02:00 AM PST
by
hchutch
("But, Rally, they're SMOKE GRENADES.")
To: Poohbah
Yet law-abiding scholars write:
Law is neither wrong nor right,
Law is only crimes
Punished by places and by times,
Law is the clothes men wear
Anytime, anywhere,
Law is Good morning and Good night. Others say, Law is our Fate;
Others say, Law is our State;
Others say, others say
Law is no more,
Law has gone away.
And always the loud angry crowd,
Very angry and very loud,
Law is We,
And always the soft idiot softly Me.
W.H. Auden (excerpt)
74
posted on
03/30/2005 7:13:41 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: ninenot
I was not referring to you. I was addressing the general Free Republic community. You were the one who posted so I figured you did not approve of him, but the "you" I was referring was a plural you not singular.
To: Poohbah
Second, a top team volunteered to help the Schindlers. They turned them down flat.Didn't know that. Who?
As for the other, it is certainly not uncommon for the federal government (state governments too) to enter briefs in cases to which they are not a party. In fact, I'd say they have a duty to if there are public interests at stake as in this case.
76
posted on
03/30/2005 8:33:34 AM PST
by
edsheppa
Comment #77 Removed by Moderator
To: econ_grad
That really is the lamest comeback since George Costanza said, "Oh yeah? Well the jerk store called and they're out of you!"
To: mountaineer
Yours was pretty lame yourself.
To: Theodore R.
"You actually had Arlen Specter and his Judiciary Committee out there trying to save this woman's life, and then you have Alberto Gonzales and his crew over at Justice basically putting up roadblocks," says a White House staffer. "This was not a good way for Gonzales to start his tenure there."Gonzales was actually putting roadblocks in front of those trying to save Terri.
80
posted on
03/30/2005 8:46:11 AM PST
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson