Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question everything -- what's more patriotic? (this writer got freeped)
DailyStanford ^ | 2/25/05 | Kalani Liefer

Posted on 02/25/2005 3:37:17 PM PST by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: pissant
Kalalani --- I'm sorry that you were removed. I would have loved the opportunity to rip your throat out, figuratively, of course. Before any more foolish comments about Iraq, please find out what really was happening in that hellhole. I have met the producers of WMD: The Murderous Reign of Saddam Hussein. I did marketing work on their film. One of them is Kurdish. He has original footage that he sneaked out of the country at the risk of his life. It would make you cry, and you would never be the same if you saw it. Hussein was a mass murderer responsible for 1.3 million deaths. Shame on you on the left who act as though you are the world's conscience on human rights around the world. If it were up to you, Saddam Hussein would still be murdering, torturing, raping, and imprisoning children. Until you do your homework, please STFU.
21 posted on 02/25/2005 4:49:10 PM PST by doug from upland (Ray Charles --- a great musician and safer driver than Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly

http://antiwar.com/past/20050221.html

Spending his time getting indoctrinated at Antiwar.com.


22 posted on 02/25/2005 4:49:10 PM PST by TheForceOfOne (Social Security – I thought pyramid schemes were illegal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Well said.


23 posted on 02/25/2005 4:50:26 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The author uses 2 main argument to support his stance:

1) "....I subscribe to the notion that the disenfranchised would sooner invest $87 billion in their ailing communities than engage in a wild goose hunt in Iraq. "
---
Answer: What you are really saying is that you subscribe to the notion that humanity is essentially a sad selfish lot who would rather take money from their fellow taxpayers to prop up their own failures and laziness than become a self sufficient, selfless individual who gives to save his fellow man who cannot save themselves.
---
2) "...That brings me to my second, equally misinterpreted point — one that permeates socio-economic standing and cuts directly to morality. To be blunt, I am wholly opposed to America’s current war in Iraq, and I refuse to see that as an unpatriotic stance. Is not a true American patriot he who relentlessly questions the actions of his leaders? Don’t take my word for it, though — take Benjamin Franklin’s: “It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.”

---

Answer) This is an interesting self-serving plucking of a quote for amximum impact. No one is saying that questioning is wrong. Questioning is quite good if your goal is to improve the system. The author however offers no alternatives nor does he offer any solution for this supposed "problem".

We can all play the game of plucking quotes, how about trying Socrates on for size. When asked why he would not flee to save himself from the sentence of death he knew faced him, he used his unassailable logic to point out that he had worked within the framework of his society and flourished his entire life. He questioned what gave him the right to turn against that same system when it wasn't working in his favor. His argument used the example of a soldier and the draft. I wonder if Stanford teaches the classics? (Sorry, but he actual text with Socrates argument as relayed by Plato is way too much for me to type in this forum)


24 posted on 02/25/2005 4:55:57 PM PST by contemplator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This person is still scum. More than willing to let someoneelse defend his freedoms for him.


25 posted on 02/25/2005 4:59:45 PM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Someone forgot to notice his first column at Stanford; Don't stop thinking blue:

"So here I am sitting in front of what turns out to be a dismally small 12-inch PowerBook screen, trying my best to figure out what makes me the authority on anything. I've been sitting here for hours. And then, as often happens when the what-the-hell-did-I-get-myself-into-this-time feeling enters my head, my oral fixation rears its ugly head."

Enough said. Makes you wonder where they get them.

26 posted on 02/25/2005 5:49:05 PM PST by ohCompGk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: contemplator

In his first argument, the author points to percieved inequalities (either real or imagined) in the current system as a reason for rejecting it completely.

How many parents have had to tell their children that life itself is not fair, period?

Our system rewards those who work hard to succeed. We have the ability in our society to maximize our inherent traits and use them to allow us to make of ourselves anything we have the ability and stamina to achieve.

In our society, people have a chance to be rewarded for achievement. This is not true in most countries around the world. One exemption of the draft exemplifies this by allowing students in college who are achieving to continue to pursue their education. This exemption is applied regardless of the individuals economic roots, yet is often the very same exemption cited by those who claim that privileged people have an advantage. This sounds like an excuse by under achievers to me.


27 posted on 02/25/2005 5:55:47 PM PST by contemplator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Elmer Piddlestone

nothing


29 posted on 02/25/2005 6:14:20 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Funny.

He says he "questions everything", but he is obviously steamed about the fact that people are questioning him.

What a pretentious little hypocrit. Suck it up.


30 posted on 02/25/2005 7:04:29 PM PST by Trippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Full Moon on the (Stanford) Quad: Great Way to get an STD!

Click here for COLD-SORE

More from the Stanford Daily

It's a seasonal, pagan thing. Everybody meets on campus at Stanford during autumnal equinox to mack down, cuz it's hip. Cuz it's OK, dig? Yeah, I've copped a good feel there....

But you know what? You can get an STD from a rich chick, too.

31 posted on 02/25/2005 7:58:34 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson