Skip to comments.
Parallel Universes exist in other Circuits, Indian Cosmo Theorist -
International Reporter ^
| February 15, 2005
| Chun
Posted on 02/21/2005 5:17:43 PM PST by UnklGene
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
02/21/2005 5:17:44 PM PST
by
UnklGene
To: UnklGene
2
posted on
02/21/2005 5:18:28 PM PST
by
Perdogg
(Rumsfeld for President - 2008)
To: UnklGene
Personally, I think the theory that we will all reincarnate someday as a cow has more merit.
3
posted on
02/21/2005 5:20:27 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: UnklGene
What come may, the scientists or astronomers cannot escape from the law of gravitation. I don't think any excuse can work? I couldn't have said it better myself.
Hmmm.
Maybe I could.
4
posted on
02/21/2005 5:20:40 PM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: UnklGene
5
posted on
02/21/2005 5:20:49 PM PST
by
Crazieman
(Islam. Religion of peace, and they'll kill you to prove it.)
To: UnklGene
Other Circuits have outsized or oversized space beyond our imagination being located in far away Circuits, even though the Universes in these Circuits have smaller sizes. So we have a circuit breaker? Or is it the Circuit Court of Appeals?
6
posted on
02/21/2005 5:22:20 PM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: UnklGene
This was an episode on Star Trek Next Generation. It wasn't that good.
7
posted on
02/21/2005 5:23:08 PM PST
by
Semi Civil Servant
(Edward R. Murrow, call your office.)
To: UnklGene
" As per Newton's law 'Every object in the Universe attracts every other object with a force directed along the line of centers for the two objects that is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the separation between the two objects." G = k*M1*M2/(D*D) - this much I understand.
8
posted on
02/21/2005 5:25:16 PM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: UnklGene
" It is just because the scientists erroneously picked up a wrong thread How do you know they didn't intentionally pick up the wrong thread?
Or maybe they erronesouly picked up the right thread?
The possibilities are endless...
9
posted on
02/21/2005 5:27:40 PM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Semi Civil Servant
Cap'n! Cap'n! The jargon generator is on overload! She canna take much more a this!
10
posted on
02/21/2005 5:28:51 PM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Crazieman
Crackpottery
======
But cracked pots once spun in their own universe !!! ;-))
11
posted on
02/21/2005 5:28:53 PM PST
by
GeekDejure
( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
To: Brilliant
theory that we will all reincarnate someday as a cow has more merit.
Better hope you come back in India and not Texas.......
12
posted on
02/21/2005 5:28:58 PM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
(Stune be damned! My beeber is set on fry!)
To: UnklGene
Sounds gravely circuitous. How much time do we have?
13
posted on
02/21/2005 5:29:40 PM PST
by
kcar
(theUNsucks.com)
To: UnklGene
This is all a bunch of pompous windmill tilting. "Two big bangs". Har!
We living beings, as entities with abilities to perceive, perceive what we are capable of perceiving and then formulate those perceptions into a "world" or a "universe" upon which we can all, particularly those of us of the human species, generally agree.
It's an interesting hobby for scientists and astronomers etc., to keep looking further and further away from our daily world in order to test the limit of their perception, but all they will learn, again and again, is the (new) limit of their perception.
To: UnklGene
Cosmo Theorists? Cosmo Kramer is most likely covered with ice beyond Neptune, not that there's anything wrong with that.
15
posted on
02/21/2005 5:32:35 PM PST
by
Ruddles
To: UnklGene
Cranks are plentiful, geniuses are few.
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: Ruddles
I dated a girl once that talked about multiple "big bangs"...
I hope this isn't what she meant...
18
posted on
02/21/2005 5:41:08 PM PST
by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
To: UnklGene
How could we have missed it? Two bangs are better than one.
This leads me to believe that the steady state theory is about to reemerge. Who has the tin foil?
19
posted on
02/21/2005 5:42:03 PM PST
by
DOGEY
To: UnklGene
It is just because the scientists erroneously picked up a wrong thread Aw, rats. I erroneously clicked on the wrong thread, too.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson