Skip to comments.
Pluto Mission Takes Aim at Last Unvisited Planet
National Geographic ^
| 2.15.05
Posted on 02/15/2005 10:38:28 PM PST by ambrose
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
02/15/2005 10:38:28 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
2015??
Yeesh, and how about a daily thread on this?? =o)
2
posted on
02/15/2005 10:49:18 PM PST
by
GeronL
(The Old Media is at war with the New Media...... We are all Matt Drudges now.)
To: ambrose
The last part of the article sums up the controversy . Pluto is not considered a planet by some scientists. Yet it should still be studied. There is also the breakaway Neptune moon theory.
To: GeronL
2015.... to send a bloody probe...
Ray Bradbury's Martian Chronicles had us colonizing Mars by 1999!
I hope we're not hitting some technological spell akin to the 1400s to 1800s where basically very little happened...
4
posted on
02/15/2005 10:53:46 PM PST
by
ambrose
(....)
To: Marano NYC
My
Very
Earnest
Mother
Just
Served
Us
Nine
Pizza pies!
5
posted on
02/15/2005 10:55:19 PM PST
by
ambrose
(....)
To: ambrose
Nope. Its a transformative period. We are awaiting the next big breakthrough, and it might be private ships going to Mars.
6
posted on
02/15/2005 10:55:33 PM PST
by
GeronL
(The Old Media is at war with the New Media...... We are all Matt Drudges now.)
To: ambrose
Yeah, nothing happened except for Leonardo Da Vinci, Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Ben Franklin...
7
posted on
02/15/2005 11:08:49 PM PST
by
WestVirginiaRebel
("Senator, we can have this discussion in any way that you would like.")
To: WestVirginiaRebel
They were brilliant theorists. What we didn't see until the 1800s, however, was life transforming technological advances (railroad/telegraph...)
8
posted on
02/15/2005 11:19:48 PM PST
by
ambrose
(....)
To: ambrose
9
posted on
02/15/2005 11:19:48 PM PST
by
Dallas59
(Bush said the "F" word 27 times January 20th, 2005!)
To: Dallas59
Now why did you have to go and do that? Now I really want to go to Pluto.
10
posted on
02/15/2005 11:20:27 PM PST
by
ambrose
(....)
To: ambrose
Thank you. Just yesterday my 10 year old asked me if I thought Pluto was a planet. We tried to determine the criteria of a planet and why it might not be considered a planet. The discussion moved to asteroid belts, too. The poll in our family was unanimous that Pluto was a planet.
11
posted on
02/15/2005 11:22:19 PM PST
by
Ruth A.
To: ambrose
Pluto's estimated surface temperature is a brutally cold, at -378 to -396 degrees Fnot so bad, just be sure to pack a sweater.
12
posted on
02/15/2005 11:26:56 PM PST
by
Nexus6
To: Ruth A.
My vote is an errant moon of Neptune..
13
posted on
02/15/2005 11:28:22 PM PST
by
ambrose
(....)
To: ambrose
Noted. Of course, I did say that since I grew up with it being a planet that I would have to be hard pressed to classify Pluto otherwise. Apparently the body of astronomers feels likewise.
14
posted on
02/15/2005 11:36:54 PM PST
by
Ruth A.
To: ambrose
I read somewhere that one of Jupiter's moons (Ganymede?) is large enough to qualify as a planet.
15
posted on
02/15/2005 11:42:35 PM PST
by
WestVirginiaRebel
("Senator, we can have this discussion in any way that you would like.")
To: ambrose
16
posted on
02/15/2005 11:44:06 PM PST
by
Captain Beyond
(The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
To: Marano NYC
Pluto is not considered a planet by some scientists. Yeah, of the terrestrial planets, it is the smallest. There are even seven moons larger that it is. Check this chart out:
17
posted on
02/15/2005 11:54:01 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: WestVirginiaRebel
I read somewhere that one of Jupiter's moons (Ganymede?) is large enough to qualify as a planet. See my #17. Ganymede (at Jupiter) and Titan (at Saturn) are both larger than Mercury.
18
posted on
02/15/2005 11:56:28 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Ruth A.
The poll in our family was unanimous that Pluto was a planet. Based on what?
19
posted on
02/15/2005 11:57:17 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
There is no firm definition of a planet, but the International Astronomical Union has ruled that Pluto meets the criteria. Generally, Pluto is considered a planet because it orbits the sun and is large enough that its own gravity gives it a circular shape. This same reasoning, but not stated as elegantly.
20
posted on
02/16/2005 12:02:14 AM PST
by
Ruth A.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson