Skip to comments.
A Theory of Biblical Creation
trueorigins.com ^
| 2000
| Timothy Wallace
Posted on 02/08/2005 10:26:54 AM PST by DannyTN
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
I especially love the predictions and tables. So much for the evolutionist's favorite argument.
1
posted on
02/08/2005 10:26:55 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: PatrickHenry; Dimensio
2
posted on
02/08/2005 10:28:25 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: DannyTN
So on what day were ocean and sea plants created?
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: <1/1,000,000th%
"So on what day were ocean and sea plants created?"Tuesday.
5
posted on
02/08/2005 10:37:21 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: DannyTN
Issue: Billions of Organisms quickly Buried in sedimentary Rock Layers laid down by Water all over the Earth
Answer: Global Flood & aftermath
Then shouldn't all buried organisms be found in the same layers? Why the differentiation?
6
posted on
02/08/2005 10:37:43 AM PST
by
BikerNYC
To: JOAT
7
posted on
02/08/2005 10:40:58 AM PST
by
14erClimb
To: DannyTN
eh, i definatly don't want to get into a flame war but this sort of data manipulation would make the MSM proud.
8
posted on
02/08/2005 10:41:37 AM PST
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier then working)
To: DannyTN
Tuesday.LOL!
That's good. How about fossils?
To: DannyTN
Is is ok to believe in the Nephilim now?
To: DannyTN
Nice cut and paste job. Nice cut and paste job from the great and famous Tim Wallace's "Trueorigins.com" website. Yes, the same Tim Wallace who has published several books for the Creationists to buy.
Snake oil of the highest order.
To: DannyTN
The preening "peer review" begins!
To: DannyTN
Creation science and naturalistic evolution are both shams, perpetrated mostly by people with an ideological agenda.
13
posted on
02/08/2005 10:48:31 AM PST
by
Sloth
(I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
To: DannyTN
The biblical record is accepted as a reliable historical basis of interpreting empirical dataWhat makes the biblical record any more reliable than any of the thousands of other interpretations you find with a simple google search for "creation myth"?
To: DannyTN
> I especially love the predictions and tables
Me, too! A most entertaining compilation of gibberish and falsehoods.
To: DannyTN
And all this proves just what, exactly?
16
posted on
02/08/2005 10:55:04 AM PST
by
elbucko
(Feral Republican)
To: BikerNYC
17
posted on
02/08/2005 10:55:45 AM PST
by
DannyTN
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: macamadamia
"Is is ok to believe in the Nephilim now?"I believe in the Nephilim, because the Bible mentions them. But I haven't much of a clue as to what they were. I don't think I'm going to go buy the latest book on the Nephilim that's based on "the book of Enoch" which has been rejected as not inspired.
The Nephilim might have been Neanderthals.
19
posted on
02/08/2005 10:58:11 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: Junior; VadeRetro; longshadow; balrog666
I won't ping the list for this. That's firm.
20
posted on
02/08/2005 11:00:33 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson