Skip to comments.
"But What Is 'Orientation'?" asked Alice
christian-news-in-maine ^
| Feb. 5, 2005
| Linda Kimball
Posted on 02/07/2005 3:06:12 PM PST by Lindykim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
02/07/2005 3:06:12 PM PST
by
Lindykim
To: EdReform; ItsOurTimeNow; little jeremiah; scripter
2
posted on
02/07/2005 3:07:23 PM PST
by
Lindykim
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: Lindykim
Actually, I am most disturbed that the author is employing the current use of the word "gender" when the appropriate word is "sex." There are but two sexes: male and female. "Gender" should be reserved for language use (e.g. French, where La is feminine gender, Le is masculine gender)
As H.W. Fowler wrote in his "Modern English Usage":
"gender...is a grammatical term only. To talk of persons...of the masculine or feminine g[ender], meaning of the male or female sex, is either a jocularity (permissible or not according to context) or a blunder."
Even the Microsoft dictionary admits that other uses are non-standard.
4
posted on
02/07/2005 3:24:41 PM PST
by
sittnick
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: Lindykim
Lewis Carrol was a mathematician and had quantum wormholes in mind in 'Alice Through the Looking Glass.'
5
posted on
02/07/2005 3:26:17 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
To: Chris_GT
snip.....is curiouser a word?
No. But in Mad Hatter Ville, where 'is' has multiple meanings, 'curiouser' can also be a valid word.
6
posted on
02/07/2005 3:30:14 PM PST
by
Lindykim
To: RightWhale
He also had in mind the devastating effects of widespread moral insanity.
7
posted on
02/07/2005 3:33:09 PM PST
by
Lindykim
To: Lindykim
"...'curiouser' can also be a valid word."
And, it can mean just what you choose it to mean - neither more nor less.
8
posted on
02/07/2005 4:39:33 PM PST
by
beelzepug
(Parking For Witches Only--All Others Will Be Toad.)
To: Lindykim
Two points vanity credit for abjuring the barbaric orientate.
9
posted on
02/07/2005 4:45:17 PM PST
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: Lindykim; DirtyHarryY2K
10
posted on
02/07/2005 7:45:52 PM PST
by
EdReform
(Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
To: ArGee; lentulusgracchus; Clint N. Suhks; Grampa Dave; SweetCaroline; nicmarlo
11
posted on
02/07/2005 7:47:49 PM PST
by
EdReform
(Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
To: sittnick
As H.W. Fowler wrote in his "Modern English Usage":
"gender...is a grammatical term only. To talk of persons...of the masculine or feminine g[ender], meaning of the male or female sex, is either a jocularity (permissible or not according to context) or a blunder."
What edition would that have been? See
sex and
gender
OTOH, see
Humpty Dumpty. "When I use a word, it means exactly what I want it to meannothing more and nothing less."
To: EdReform
13
posted on
02/07/2005 8:22:47 PM PST
by
SweetCaroline
(Be still and rest in the Lord; wait for Him and lean yourself upon him... Psalm 37:7)
To: Lindykim; EdReform; ArGee; little jeremiah; GOPcapitalist; William Terrell; scripter; ...
Multiculturalism is a neo-Marxist theory, and it's the engine driving our social order to ruin. And it's from multiculturalism that political correctness and the insanity producing notion of 'orientation' arose. Multiculturalism has the disasterous consequence of dividing and categorizing mankind into classes by 'orientation', gender, economic status, religious belief, and ethnicity. Each of these classes are then locked in constant warfare over rights. Bingo. We have a winner.
At this moment, Republicans have the power to pull the plug on this engine of destruction.
DEFUND THE LEFT!!
To: lentulusgracchus
snip...At this moment, Republicans have the power to pull the plug on this engine of destruction
I'd dearly love to see that happen. But it would entail the divestiture of status and power from 'special rights' groups. And I can't see that happening without a lot of ugliness. And with regards to homosexuals, they would need to accept that they aren't 'oriented beings' but simply males and females who have a same-sex attraction disorder.
We need a massive re-education effort, imo.
15
posted on
02/08/2005 3:16:54 AM PST
by
Lindykim
To: mista science
What edition would that have been? See sex and gender
Both the first and second editions. The third edition is a complete rewrite of the entire book, and is not Fowler's work at all.
16
posted on
02/08/2005 5:05:31 AM PST
by
sittnick
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Thanks for posting this Lindykim! Hey scripter, this one's a keeper. If you want on/off the ping list see my profile page.
17
posted on
02/08/2005 9:50:15 AM PST
by
DirtyHarryY2K
(''Go though life with a Bible in one hand and a Newspaper in the other" -- Billy Graham)
To: All
18
posted on
02/08/2005 11:56:04 AM PST
by
Lindykim
To: Lindykim
To: two134711
20
posted on
02/08/2005 3:16:40 PM PST
by
Lindykim
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson