Posted on 01/28/2005 2:41:00 PM PST by HappyHere
VW lodged a criminal complaint with prosecutors in Brunswick, Germany, but did not specify a perpetrator, Company spokesman Hartwig von Sass told Reuters.
"This is an attack on Volkswagen's good name," he said of the ad, which he called cynical and criminal.
Under German law, it is possible to file charges against persons unknown and prosecutors and police are obliged to try to track down the perpetrators.
The VW spokesman told Reuters the complaint was about "all crimes that could be considered in this regard."
A report earlier this week on the Website of the British newspaper The Guardian said that VW was considering taking some sort of legal action against the makers of the film but the company had been unable to locate them.
The makers of the film, according to various media reports, are a London based creative team known only as Lee and Dan. They have been quoted as saying that the ad was leaked accidentally and was never intended for public viewing. They have apologized for the film, according to previous reports.
They have reportedly not said how the making of the film was financed.
The film, which looks like an advertisement for the car, shows a middle-eastern looking man getting into a Volkswagen Polo, a compact car the company sells in Europe. The man drives the car to a spot in front of a sidewalk cafe. He looks down and presses the button of what looks like a bomb detonator held in front of an explosive-filled vest.
At that point, filmed from a vantage point outside the car, an explosion goes off inside the passenger compartment and blood spatters across the car's windows. The car, however, remains intact. The film ends with the tag line "Polo: small but tough."
Volkswagen has insisted that it had no knowledge that the film was being made and that Volkswagen provided no financing for it.
"We vehemently condemn that film and what it represents," Tony Fouladpour, a spokesman for Volkswagen of America told CNN/Money earlier this week.
Lee and Dan have not yet responded to an e-mail sent Wednesday morning by CNN/Money.
The pair have worked on advertising campaigns for various companies and products according to their Web site.
The film first appeared on the Internet around the middle of January.
So, what's VW's problem?
They DON'T think the Polo is Small, but Tough?
bahahaha..
ok.. that's terrible
pingaling
They DON'T think the Polo is Small, but Tough?
It might drive their Mid-East sales to Renault, whose cars fragment much more easily.
lol
I figured Renault, being French and all, already had special fleet incentive deals for Al Quaida.
They DON'T think the Polo is Small, but Tough?
VW is notorious about unauthorized use of its images and logos. A few years ago, when the New Beetle came out, it shut down a lot of websites.
That. Is. Awesome!
We're not sure who were suing, we're just suing somebody.
That is almost as funny as that Ford ad with the cat's head being sliced off by the automatic sunroof.
My only complaint: They needed to get Hitler into it somehow. Maybe if the towelhead glanced at a large photo of Hitler designing the 'Bug' with Porsche for inspiration just before blowing himself up.
Now THAT would have REALLY gotten VW's goat!!
Don't forget the "full ashtray".
"Full Ashtray" What's that? You got a link?
Great VW picture caption of Ted Kennedy. Never seen it before.
I've seen it.
I have to say criminal charges seems like a little much.
The film was tasteless, but I'll admit it made me chuckle. And it memorably advanced the point: "Small but tough".
Traditionally, stuff like this is protected speech, as satire, so I don't think they have much to worry about.
The $40,000 price tag of it, though, is, well, a bit extreme. I was shocked someone would shoot a spec ad on film in this day and age.
D
I guess they haven't sold as many of those death traps as they had hoped and need to cover their losses.
Au contraire, it was magnifique !
VW's wadded panties just lost 'em a potential buyer.
I'm still not convinced VW didn't have a hand in making this. I too think it's very odd to make a spec ad of this quality and budget-- spec work is usually a bit more down and dirty. Who would spend 40K pounds on something that is not intended to be seen by only but a handful of potential clients as a "proof of competancy" project?
Doesn't smell right to me. BTW, I'm in the business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.