Skip to comments.
A note on the Armanious case
jihadwatch.org ^
| January 24, 2005
| www.jihadwatch.com
Posted on 01/24/2005 9:07:31 PM PST by indcons
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 last
To: Dark Skies; jan in Colorado
In this case, it strikes me that the accuser knows the accusation is unfounded but, with no way of winning the argument legitimately, the accuser is trying to destroy the debate itself by reducing it to a name calling contest (which is a victory of sorts). Or puts words into peoples mouths and conducts straw man arguments that do not address the real concerns or issues at hand.
I too have come to the conclusion that some peoples real motivation is to provoke and seek conflict by using the name calling tactics of the left instead of replying with more reasoned and well thought out responses.
61
posted on
01/25/2005 3:33:48 PM PST
by
USF
(I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
To: Former Dodger
And we infidels must not let it go away..it's the least we can do for the victims..and for our own communities.
62
posted on
01/25/2005 6:40:23 PM PST
by
ariamne
(reformed liberal-Shieldmaiden of the Infidel)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson