CRITIQUE OF EVOLUTION RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL EST. OF RELIGION

Pastabagel.com ^ | 1/14/2005 | Pastabagel

[Alacarte]

"The "prestigious" and "nonpartisan" NAS supports evolution. Boy, that sure is persuasive. "

Fine, then what do you consider prestigious science institutions? Make sure it isn't one of these...

http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/9522_statements_from_scientific_and_12_19_2002.asp

"So evolution is neither a theory or a law. It is "science." LOL! "

It's a theory, why is that so difficult? Just because you can't reconcile the definition with evolution means nothing except that you have absolutely no training in science. If you not being able to understand something made it unreal, my toaster wouldn't work.

"I really don't give a flip about what the bloomin' NAS NASA or the whole "scientific community" think about evolution. At one time the whole "scientific community" thought that black folks were a subspecies of humans and that malaria was caused by "bad air." The scientific community in Germany believed that Slavs were inferior to Aryans. So much for science and scientists. "

Ok then, interesting philosophy. I'll be sure to wave when I drive by your cave...

"Maybe I didn't learn alot in grade school, Bozo, but I learned that no scientific organization is unbiased and nonpartisan."

You ignore the inherently self-correcting nature of science. You are quick to point out mistakes scientists have made, but who discovered those mistakes? I'll give you a hint... they weren't clergy...

"So Adios, Frenchie. Go away and comfort yourself with the thought that you are so much more educated and sophisticated than the pea-brained cave-dwellers that dare to challenge your "scientific" orthodoxy."

I'm not french, given that my english is better than yours I thought that would be obvious. Je peut parle francais, mais je suis beucoup mieux en anglais, thanks anyway.