[superskunk]

Anyone ever consider suing the ACLU for false advertising. They seem to support civil liberties that don't exist while fighting against others that actually do exist. They call themselves the American Civil Liberties Union, but that name is extremely misleading. That in itself is fine until they start soliciting donations. At that point, people are donating money under a false pretense, which I believe is illegal.

Any lawyers on FR care to offer an opinion? I'd love to hear it.

[loveliberty2]

"If you want ID taught in schools, fine. But under no circumstances may it be taught in science class, since scientists unanimously agree it is NOT science."

By the way, it takes more faith and less reason to believe the so-called "scientific" explanations than to accept the conclusions of the ID people.

Guess we'll all find out who's correct soon enough now, won't we?

In the meantime, why not let there be a free marketplace of ideas presented to students and let each generation decide for themselves. What's to fear?

[BJungNan]

The words of Patrick Henry

"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is impossible that a nation of infidels or idolaters should be a nation of free men. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom."

Patrick Henry ·1736-1799·
Virginia House of Burgesses
Born: May 29, 1736 in: Hanover County, Virginia.
Education: (Lawyer, Politician)
Work: Elected to Virginia House of Burgesses, 1765;
Admitted to the Bar of the General Court in Virginia, 1769;
Elected to the Continental Congress, 1774; Virginia Militia Leader, 1775; Governor of Virginia, 1776-1778, 1784.
Died: June 6, 1799.

And how now has this nation evolved?

[RussP]

I just read a very interesting article about mousetraps. Read about how Michael Behe's mousetrap analogy has been misunderstood and distorted by the evolutionists:

http://www.arn.org/docs/behe/mb_mousetrapdefended.htm

This is great stuff. Don't miss it.

In fairness, let me point out that I found the link to this article on an evolutionist's webpage.

[Alacarte]

http://www.nationalacademies.org/attic/evolution/
http://www.aaas.org/spp/dser/evolution/perspectives.shtml
http://genetics.faseb.org/genetics/g-gsa/statement_on_evolution.shtml
http://www.botany.org/newsite/announcements/evolution.php
http://www.nabt.org/sub/position_statements/evolution.asp
http://www.geosociety.org/aboutus/position1.htm
http://www.nsta.org/evresources
http://web.sfn.org/content/AboutSfN1/Guidlines/evolution.html
http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/evolution.htm
http://www.unc.edu/depts/msen/statement/evolution.html

Anyway, the scientific community says evolution is true and ID and creationism are crap. Anyone have any actual links to real science websites to dispute these links? A REAL science website is a paper published in a science journal, or a governmental science website like the NAS.

Didn't think so...