Posted on 12/09/2004 9:22:17 AM PST by Nascardude
Edited on 12/09/2004 10:05:10 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
He probably was a student of this journalism professor:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1297510/posts?page=1#1
Thanks for the ping.
LOL!
What the hell does this say about our intelligence for allowing this to happen in the first damn place! What the hell would they expect a reporter to do?
I the questions we all fabricated and lies, why in hell did the troops all erupt in cheers when they were asked?
Why in hell did we have a reporter in there?
Where the f**k is our intellegence?
The other soldiers cheering and applauding, was that made up or a plant, too?
Even if the question was "planted", its still a good question. My son will be going to Iraq soon and I for one want him to have armored vehicles available. If it requires putting heat on government than so be it. This country can produce a car a second, its capable of producing enough armored vehicles in Iraq in less than a month for every soldier to have his choice of colors, and optional moon roof.
Dear Lee: This is not the truth. You are a damned liar. Lies of omission are just as much lies. Your actions and your letter are self-serving and traitorous.
That worried soldier has reason to be worried. This isn't a game for him. Yes, the reporter made sure his guys got up to the mike, but the soldier is no child, he bought into the question, and the motive here was not an unpatriotic one. They want better armor. I for one, don't blame them a bit. And this is an American army, not the second best, the best. We have the means to send over the very best of support for those troops. The story that matters to the rest of the guys in that room is that their stuff will be there today.
there were six or eight up-armored humvees. Theyre not there anymore.
and that's supposed to be a good thing.
Check out his other articles. he has been working on this little stunt for a long time. I wonder how much info the soldier got from this reporter, not vice versa. MSM propaganda at work.
You're saying this on a message board that was concerned terrorists were using loose FR lips to sink ships during OIF and OEF.
So what? The lack of up armored humvees is still an issue.
Check this ping.......
Re; How is this a planted story? Because the media, which was barred from asking Q's, "worked" with the soldiers in the Q and A.
Re: Is it a false assessment therefore wrong to ask? Depends on how the MSM handles the situation. What's the consequence? Better armament? The consequence of the MSM questions appears to be a feeding frenzy (career enhancement and destroying the military). MSM doesn't care about the soldiers (how do you think Reuters and AP get those delightful pictures of terrorists shooting RPGs and mortar rounds at our boys without warning our boys); the MSM cares about their leftist cause.
The Sherman tank was a death trap in WWII. The MSM did not report this. The military rearmed the beast after years of service in the French hedgerow. BTW, the Sherman tank was able to clear the hedgrows after Army personel rummage through the trash for scrap metal to improvise a hedgerow trimmer.
The MSM routinely gives away tactics (Geraldo), coordinates, weakness, and plays to the enemy's PR machine.
That was not the point I was trying to make .. that is not how the MSM is spinning this .. they are making it sound like our government is doing Nothing
"That email is too perfect...something's fishy about this..."
That's what I think, too. The email may be bogus. If so, it would be dirt on Drudge's nose. I can't really imagine a reporter revealing such damning information about himself, even to staffers on his paper.
I'm holding off on this one until I can see some other confirmation. Drudge doesn't always get it right.
Underequipped? This is the best-equipped military force in any conflict, any where, any time, in the history of mankind. Soldiers will always complain no matter what they have. You can't send them into a conflict with a Star-Trek style force field bubble around them you know.
So what we need to do is strip the armor off existing up-armored vehicles, right?
You mean he wasn't a real soldier but a reporter dressed as a solider?
No, he means he was a ficus...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.