Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: blink182prj
If you're a Democrat, this is your require response:
THIS MUST BE STOPPED!!! NOW!!! WE CANNOT ALLOW OUR MILITARY TO DEVELOP WEAPONS THAT ACTUALLY LET THEM WIN BATTLES!!!
Pretty sick ideology, if you ask me.
2 posted on
12/05/2004 1:31:46 PM PST by
BobL
To: blink182prj
It will likely be in Iraq in the next 12 months. A crowd control weapon? Are we going to be controlling crowds in Iraq? Or using non lethal weapons against terrorist?
3 posted on
12/05/2004 1:32:38 PM PST by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: blink182prj
'Turbaned Tater Tots!
hehehe Yeah, I know I'm a sick puppy!
6 posted on
12/05/2004 1:39:01 PM PST by
45semi
(Man has only those rights he can defend...)
To: blink182prj
7 posted on
12/05/2004 1:41:22 PM PST by
toddlintown
(Pull another beer.)
To: blink182prj
They should develop something like this to aim at the ground in front of their Humvee to detonate these damned roadside bombs before they get there.
10 posted on
12/05/2004 1:48:00 PM PST by
ThirstyMan
(Why is it, All the dead seem to vote for Democrats?)
To: blink182prj
I can't help thinking that a .50 cal M2HB would be a more effective source of "heat".
To: blink182prj
They should develop something like this to aim at the ground in front of their Humvees to detonate these damned roadside bombs before they get there.
15 posted on
12/05/2004 1:50:29 PM PST by
ThirstyMan
(Why is it, All the dead seem to vote for Democrats?)
To: blink182prj
Maybe if you tape bags of popcorn on your chest, it'll be like reactive armor.
17 posted on
12/05/2004 1:54:51 PM PST by
Sender
(Team Infidel USA)
To: blink182prj
The product is expected to be evaluated from February through June to determine whether to equip U.S. forces with it, Colonel David Karcher, director of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate, told Bloomberg Business News. Can they evaluate it by using it on the left side of Congress, or would that be inappropriate?
18 posted on
12/05/2004 1:55:12 PM PST by
EGPWS
To: blink182prj
who has felt the weapon's beam and compares it to having a hot iron placed on the skinSure this is non-lethal, but what are you going to do with this kind of heat on you? I think this is pretty cool.
20 posted on
12/05/2004 1:59:06 PM PST by
kizzdogg
To: blink182prj
FWIW This idea has been around since Viet Nam. I am close friends with an engineer who worked on the project. It used high energy microwaves to deliver about 1 megawatt of RF out of a 6 foot water cooled focused dish. Problem is that it was not mobile and in field testing it exploded anything with water in it out about 500 yards.
This guy swears it was field tested in Nam and since humans were exploding like cats in a microwave the brass didn't think the American public would got for it so the program was shutdown. Also, I believe making it mobile with that power consumption, at that time, would have been impossible. Could of been great for fixed installations though.
21 posted on
12/05/2004 2:04:36 PM PST by
mad_as_he$$
("Sure is a nice day for making things right." Boss Spearman. NSDQ, De Opresso Libre)
To: blink182prj
Phrases such as ""focused, speed-of-light millimeter wave energy beam to induce an intolerable heating sensation,'' according to a U.S. Air Force fact sheet." kinda scare me.
I mean honestly, thats from a "fact sheet".
I think its safe to say that the beam is "focused", "speed of light (in a vacuum), and "energy beam". Its pretty damn redundant to say it that way.
The proper phrase is . . . its a "*microwave* beam that burns people" (or whatever type of electromagnetic radiation it consists of.
26 posted on
12/05/2004 2:28:01 PM PST by
ruiner
To: blink182prj
Wonder if this will be used in the next Bond film...
sort of like the laser beam in "Goldfinger"...
28 posted on
12/05/2004 2:32:19 PM PST by
VOA
To: blink182prj
Phasers on incinerate....
29 posted on
12/05/2004 2:32:48 PM PST by
RandallFlagg
(FReepers, Do NOT let the voter fraud stories die!!!! (Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name))
To: blink182prj
Great idea! Test it out at the Palace in Auburn Hills...
To: blink182prj
Will this melt the gold off the dome of a mosque?
Will it melt minerets like a candle?
Will it make the inside of a house like a convection oven?
41 posted on
12/05/2004 3:26:29 PM PST by
pointsal
To: blink182prj
Heal said the military version would cost about $1 million, and the U.S. military could require many Ah, how many M16s can you get for $1 million?
To: blink182prj
Wonder what a leather jacket would do for the enemy?
55 posted on
12/05/2004 4:49:41 PM PST by
deaconjim
(Freep the world!)
To: blink182prj; First_Salute
57 posted on
12/05/2004 4:51:51 PM PST by
snopercod
(Bigger government means clinton won. Less freedom means Osama won. Get it?)
To: blink182prj
" . . . with laser beams?"
58 posted on
12/05/2004 4:54:12 PM PST by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZ 61,683,787 Bush fans.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson