Skip to comments.
Should The F-22 be cancelled?
26-nov,2004
| Me
Posted on 11/25/2004 6:44:38 PM PST by Haro_546
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 621-636 next last
To: airborne
To: airborne
The F-22 is a great aircraft. This and future platforms have to be developed to stay ahead of the newest versions of the SU-37 with vectored thrust and its successors.
To: Haro_546
Ah well, I've spent plenty of years running around playing Don Quixote!
343
posted on
11/25/2004 9:21:26 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
To: ampat
China will probably have countermeasures by then.
344
posted on
11/25/2004 9:21:47 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: Haro_546
Given all I've read and been told . . . no specifics to speak of still in the memory banks . . . but the distillation . . .
yeah.
I believe it.
I expect, if Werner Von Braun was accurate at all, we should be seeing evidence of it in the next 3-12 years. He asserted around 1974 that after the planned war with terror and then with Iraq, would be an unneeded and dangerous war with ET in space.
345
posted on
11/25/2004 9:23:22 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
To: Quix
I'm not sure how much water can be held by things you read here and there but i've read (and heard from people involved with Boeing) that the B2 Stealth Bomber actually having anti-gravity technology.
To: Quix
LOL, the F-22 is a DOn quixote project.
347
posted on
11/25/2004 9:23:44 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: JRandomFreeper
Thanks for the Thanksgiving blessing and the same back at you.
I don't expect to be believed at this point in time. My statements will be remembered or reminded of . . . in later contexts.
Believing or NOT believing will be much less of a CHOICE then.
348
posted on
11/25/2004 9:25:06 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
To: Quix
349
posted on
11/25/2004 9:25:19 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: Haro_546
350
posted on
11/25/2004 9:25:49 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
To: Oblongata
Good evening.
"...it's an excellent system for a war defending Taiwan against China, or against N Korea."
You left out our not-so-good friends the Russians and the French.
Michael Frazier
351
posted on
11/25/2004 9:27:25 PM PST
by
brazzaville
(No surrender no retreat, Well, maybe retreat's ok.)
To: streetpreacher
You have obviously been paying such little attention with such a meager grasp of the few facts and assertions I've offered . . .
I would likely despair utterly of realistically hoping to . . .
be of any value toward your enlightenment at all.
352
posted on
11/25/2004 9:27:38 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
To: Andrew LB
353
posted on
11/25/2004 9:27:52 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: Quix
It is. I think F-22 belongs with the Comanche, and the Crusader as outdated weaponry.
354
posted on
11/25/2004 9:29:57 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: airborne
I like the lines.
Is it from a movie or a so called prototype?
355
posted on
11/25/2004 9:30:02 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
To: airborne
With the multitude of systems at hand, the F-22 is, IMHO, a step in the right direction, and a valuable addition to our arsenal. Where I work, we machine many titanium parts for the F-22. Tolerances on the F-22 are tighter than the F-15 and F-18, too. This all adds to the cost besides all the data we now have save on the major fittings. I think the F-22 will be worth the cost. It will show the Chinese, Russians, French, or Indians that we mean business.
My Dad, who was a long time McDonell-Douglas manager and WW2 veteran would say "Those who control the skys will win the battle". Then he would add "Son, you don't want to be on the losing side in a war". A firm believer in peace through strength.
To: Haro_546
Hey man... just because you hear something doesn't mean its true. People talk a lot more than they know.
To: Andrew LB
so? they know more than they talk as well.
358
posted on
11/25/2004 9:32:07 PM PST
by
Haro_546
(Christian Zionist)
To: Haro_546
The F-15 was the finest fighter in its day. It will always be close to my heart for the long nights in overseas locations that I spent guarding it. The Russians put their MiG 25 up against it and for awhile the US was a little concerned about how the F-15 would fare in combat against the MiG, that is until a Soviet defector landed a MiG in Japan and US intelligence was able to see for themselves the inferior design of their fighter. Times have changed and the Russians are building some fine fighter jets nowadays. The beloved Eagle has fallen behind in superiority even with all of its retro fits. America can not wait to see what other countries have developed. We must continue to improve and upgrade weapons systems (both offensive and defensive) to thwart a preemptive attack. The Cold War with the former Soviet Union was won without massive loss of life due to advanced technology. We must continue to lead the way for the sake of future generations. The F-22 is a step in the right direction from what I've read.
359
posted on
11/25/2004 9:33:34 PM PST
by
Mustng959
(In loving memory of those that gave their all to preserve our Freedoms!)
To: streetpreacher
Do you need glasses?
I've never spoken about puppet masteR unless maybe occasionally about George Soros but I doubt even then. I ALWAYS speak about
puppetmasterS.
Please get it right if you insist on pontificating toward me!
I would say that in general, given the puppet masters hell-bent desire to force, coerce the world's citizens into a world government; given Werner von Braun's assertions, it seems exceedingly logical to me that the puppet masters are behind the terrorists in general. I wouldn't know how specifically.
I certainly believe that they were behind the OKC bombing as evidently was Iraq.
And, I've begun to form a theory that they may be setting up Islam to become briefly the world religion consuming all others or destroying all others, only to then be also destroyed as satan insists on all worship himself.
360
posted on
11/25/2004 9:33:51 PM PST
by
Quix
(5having a form of godliness but denying its power. I TIM 3:5)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 621-636 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson