Interesting
Why would this scare anybody AWAY from Kerry? After all, he said he was going to "hunt them down and kill them".
Of course he will say this. Because its a lot harder to admit the majority of Americans just do not like his ideas.
I wonder, is the UBL tape seared, I mean seared in his mind now? just wondering.
Now I'm doubly glad that me & my friend Karl made that tape.
Kerry is such a loser. He didn't lose because of anything "Raghead" bin Laden had to say. He lost because he IS a loser and he has been revealed as such by the Swiftboat heroes and all the veterans of the Vietnam era. He's a scumbag and will always be one.
As for Geraldo, he's a punk. I ran into him once on Siesta Key Florida (Sarasota). He and his "hangers-on" are absolute boors without any redeeming qualities. The only thing bigger than his nose is his ego.
This is probably my favorite picture of the a~~hole.
I only wish I'd been the one credited for clobbering him.
Ain't it the bleedin' truth!
Well... the idea that OBL endorsed the F'N one probably did hurt him a bit. Bush still would have won w/o the tapes comeing out.
The truth is that bin Laden told us to vote for Kerry.
What an albatross to have to wear around his neck. The
terrorist actually threatened us to vote for Kerry! So,
the DU type cowards voted as bin Laden told them. Most
of them are in blue states, though, and bin Laden promised
not to hurt them. Actually, the only SCARED faction were
the ones bin Laden was able to SCARE into voting for Kerry.
- Of course, if bin Laden's Al Quaida hits a blue state,
Madelaine Albright can appear on a morning news show and
say, "He cheated." (like she said about Kim Jong Il) That
will make everyone feel better.
havig a nutjob for a wife didnt help a lot either.
Of course, John, it was the UBL tape. Your loss had nothing to do with your lack of morals or inability to hold a single position on an issue for more than 5 minutes.
I HOPE it scared them. They NEEDED scaring. Too many people "Have Forgotten" in our country. And it's only been about 40 months now.
Yesterday Kerry's excuse was that an assistant gave him bad advice, per Boston Globe:
***Another blunder came on Aug. 9, when Kerry was asked whether he would have voted for the Iraq war resolution even knowing Iraq had no WMD. Yes, Kerry answered, saying it was "the right authority for a president to have" -- further muddying an Iraq stance that was already hard to explain. The candidate didn't hear the entirety of the question, the Kerry camp has since suggested. A Newsweek postmortem of the campaign, meanwhile, says Kerry blamed Stephanie Cutter, his thirtysomething communications director, for urging him to answer yes to a question they knew was coming.***
Is anybody keeping track of the number of excuses this loser can come up with.
That and the fact his traitorous conduct toward 'Nam vets surfaced.
Tarayza surfacing like a great white whale periodically didn't help either ;)
Osama was just trying to help you win, Senator Kerry. How was he to know that his dimwitted tape would cause the defeat of his preffered candidate.
Just like you Senator-Osama under estimated the intelligence and the guts of Americans.
THe similiarity between yourself and Osama, doesn't stop at being tall, swarthy, big nosed, arrogant and irrational-you are both absolute losers, in total denial.
How long did it take for the Dem. campaign to "rebut it" -- five seconds -- by saying the tape just proved that the Bush Administration took their eye off the ball of pursuing bin Laden to go to Iraq and that the tape was proof of how incompetent Bush was in "outsourcing" the hunt for bin Laden?
So it certainly did counteract it, only no one bought it! And no amount of time will have enabled the Democrats to convince Americans that George Bush did not take the War on Terror seriously, or that Kerry would be more successful.
If Kerry/Soros lost the election due to their Serbophobia and their backing of the "gay" agenda, that is simple justice!!!!
As I said on another thread on this subject:
How ridiculous!
Those of us who voted for President Bush know that our decision was based on Bush's record of consistency in defending the principles of liberty, and of his authenticity.
Isn't it just like the vascillating Kerry to blame his sound defeat on a shadowy character in the Middle East, rather than admitting that he tried to mask his long-held anti-war sentiment, his decades-long distrust of the Intelligence community, and his welfare-state mentality which American voters rejected.
While he may have displayed a flip-flop tendency about current and recent matters, we who researched his 70's statements and writings found him to be totally committed to the same ideas he had advanced in his very first run for the Congress way back in the early 70's.
In his Harvard Crimson interview prior to that campaign, he stated that he believed that the CIA should be abolished and that American troops should be dispersed throughout the world ONLY AT THE DIRECTION OF THE UNITED NATIONS!!!!!
Does his 20-year Senate record indicate that he has changed his position on these two vital issues? NO! His voting record confirms that the anti-Vietnam war Kerry is the authentic Kerry who presented himself to 2004 voters as a candidate for strong intelligence and strong defense, and a majority of American voters recognized the REAL John Kerry and voted against him.
Osama had nothing to do with it!
bump!