Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arnold and Maria: Still No Home in Sacramento
NewsMax ^ | 11/17/04 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 11/17/2004 5:40:13 PM PST by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
I don't see why any of this is Scwarzenegger's fault, Grayout Davis certainly didn't have to pay for his residence. And $6000 per month actually seems fairly cheap when you take into account what a true governor's mansion plus household staff and upkeep would cost.
1 posted on 11/17/2004 5:40:14 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Let Arnie be. He's doing the job we sent him there for and if he actually likes to live out of a hotel instead of a residence, well, that's his business. Leave him alone.


2 posted on 11/17/2004 5:43:32 PM PST by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Just across the street from the office should save on limo bills.


3 posted on 11/17/2004 5:43:56 PM PST by Jim Robinson (No more obstructionist Senate! Sixty in 06!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

agreed


4 posted on 11/17/2004 5:44:02 PM PST by b9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Plus, he's not taking a salary.


5 posted on 11/17/2004 5:45:29 PM PST by Hildy (The really great men are always simple and true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

They are loser girly men!


6 posted on 11/17/2004 5:46:14 PM PST by Feiny (Scream if you love silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I simply can't imagine the stress on a mega millionaire having to endure a $6000/mo. hotel suite. Must be horrific.


7 posted on 11/17/2004 5:48:48 PM PST by Rebelbase (Indiscriminate reprisals strengthen the terrorists. Targeted ones weaken them. Aim is everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
There is no governor's mansion in Sacramento

How is this possible in a state that wastes money on everything else, never bothers to build an executive residence? California must be about the only state in the union NOT to have a govenors mansion.

Alaska's Governor's Mansion

8 posted on 11/17/2004 5:51:17 PM PST by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The old Governor's mansion on 16th street is a museum now if I recall correctly. The governor needs a house.


9 posted on 11/17/2004 5:52:32 PM PST by afnamvet (Tuy Hoa AB RVN 68-69 Jet Noise...The Sound of Freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Let's not be financial girlie men, people. Let him be.


10 posted on 11/17/2004 5:53:54 PM PST by AbercrombieChick (The last time Democrats wanted to secede, it was because they wanted the right to own black people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It's not Arnie's fault. The Reagan residence was fine, but as I recall, Jerry Brown refused to live there and let it go out of state control. Just goes to show how far south this state has gone.


11 posted on 11/17/2004 5:57:42 PM PST by GVnana (If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Plus, he's not taking a salary.

When you consider the fact that he isn't making any movies while in office and his wife is no longer working, my guess is that the Scwarzeneggers are giving up at least $10 million a year in income while he is in office. Now I realize that many politicians take pay cuts to serve, there is absolutely no reason that a state the size of California doesn't have a governor's mansion. Now the left is blaming him for not paying more than he wanted to pay (with his own money), for a house that the state government was supposed to have bought over thirty years ago.

12 posted on 11/17/2004 6:01:36 PM PST by wagglebee (Memo to sKerry: the only think Bush F'ed up was your career)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Agreed. It's embarrassing for California, the state of rolling blackouts and homeless governors.


13 posted on 11/17/2004 6:02:38 PM PST by IStillBelieve (G.W. Bush '04: Biggest popular-vote victory in history, and first popular-vote majority in 16 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

not to worry, RINOld won't be around much longer. LMAO


14 posted on 11/17/2004 6:12:05 PM PST by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I don't think the "look what Arnold is missing in income" argument is going to be very persuasive. He is rich enough to NEVER worry about income again. He became governor of California as a new challenge. Making money is no longer much of a challenge to someone as rich as he is.

I think the governator could rent the biggest house in Sacramento without much of a dent in his budget.

The early Presidents of the United States had to PAY THEIR OWN STAFF'S SALARIES IF THEY WANTED PAID HELP AROUND!

15 posted on 11/17/2004 6:19:55 PM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: konaice
How is this possible in a state that wastes money on everything else, never bothers to build an executive residence

Governor "Moonbeam" Brown

16 posted on 11/17/2004 6:23:22 PM PST by itsahoot (Sometimes the truth hurts, sometimes it makes a difference, but not often.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

California's crisis was the result of fiscal irresponsibility, the fact that Arnold CAN afford to pay for his own residence doesn't mean he SHOULD pay for it. Picking up the tab for the state because he can afford it doesn't make the state become responsible, that is just another form of what Grayout Davis tried to get the federal government to do. California can have a thriving economy, but it will never happen if they keep looking for handouts. For what it's worth, I don't think very many of us would be happy living in a hotel room for over a year.


17 posted on 11/17/2004 6:30:47 PM PST by wagglebee (Memo to sKerry: the only think Bush F'ed up was your career)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
And $6000 per month actually seems fairly cheap when you take into account what a true governor's mansion plus household staff and upkeep would cost.

I was thinking the same thing. It's a non-story.

18 posted on 11/17/2004 6:53:29 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Jerry Brown didn't live in the governor's mansion. Nancy Reagan WOULD not live there. This seems to be an ongoing condition!


19 posted on 11/17/2004 6:58:30 PM PST by BunnySlippers (George W. Bush is our president ... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVgirl

Nancy could not live in the governor's mansion because it was broken down. Jerry Brown did not live there (that was before the Reagans) ... but the mansion was supposedly so broken down in the Reagan years that it was essentially unlivable.


20 posted on 11/17/2004 7:01:44 PM PST by BunnySlippers (George W. Bush is our president ... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson