Skip to comments.
Can the Pentagon charge Kevin Sites?
Posted on 11/16/2004 1:07:33 PM PST by nothernlights
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 501-508 next last
To: Simcha7
401
posted on
11/18/2004 2:01:51 PM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)
To: Conspiracy Guy
looks that way, sho'nuff.
402
posted on
11/18/2004 2:02:53 PM PST
by
King Prout
(tagline under reconstruction)
To: azhenfud
iheartconservatism Is still hiding. Last seen on 284. See if you can smoke em out. I think I skeeert the poop out of him so nothing was left.
403
posted on
11/18/2004 2:04:57 PM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)
To: Simcha7
Hmmmm.. catnip..
*jingle jingle*
What's with the bells I keep hearing?!
404
posted on
11/18/2004 2:05:16 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(X)The belled one (X)
To: King Prout
I challenged me and ran away. Typical Liberal Bluster.
405
posted on
11/18/2004 2:05:35 PM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)
To: iheartconservatism; azhenfud
Trust us to run across a troll who's sceered...
406
posted on
11/18/2004 2:06:31 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(X)The belled one (X)
To: Conspiracy Guy
ROTFLOL!!
So THAT was what that green haze was!
Whew! Glad I missed it when I did!
407
posted on
11/18/2004 2:11:56 PM PST
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: Darksheare
Ya'll boo-ed 'em off, didn't ya?!?
Takes all the fun right out of a troll when they leave mad...;-)
408
posted on
11/18/2004 2:14:52 PM PST
by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: azhenfud
I didn't know he'd be upset about having his patwiotithm quethtioned..
*chuckle*
(For some reason.. he reminded me of Weasel Clark.)
409
posted on
11/18/2004 2:16:08 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(X)The belled one (X)
To: King Prout
410
posted on
11/18/2004 2:19:14 PM PST
by
Laura Earl
(1/2way290)
To: Conspiracy Guy; iheartconservatism
411
posted on
11/18/2004 2:20:02 PM PST
by
Laura Earl
(1/2way290)
To: Conspiracy Guy
Is, are, who cares. Sites should be arrested or allowed to go join his heroes the terrorist.OK, please show legal cause to arrest him--cite the specific statute he's guilty of violating.
412
posted on
11/18/2004 2:30:46 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: azhenfud
I tried every approach to get him to respond. He hides in fear biting his toenails and picking his nose. Chickentroll.
413
posted on
11/18/2004 2:32:27 PM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)
To: Laura Earl
He'd need four promotions to be a girlyman.
414
posted on
11/18/2004 2:35:05 PM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)
To: Conspiracy Guy
Right - he is still single cell.
415
posted on
11/18/2004 2:43:17 PM PST
by
Laura Earl
(1/2way290)
To: Poohbah; Darksheare
True. But journalists used to have war footage and even cables or dispatches approved. Before Nam most were patriotic enough that it wasn't a big deal. This scum bucket has done nothing but fuel the Jihad fire. And the MSM is using the incident to damn our soldiers. Had I been through what this Marine had been through and knowing what they have faced every day, I'd have emptied my clip into a moving terrorist scumbag.
So I'll go to the original secondary offer, let Kevin Sites join his heroes the terrorists and film their happy exploits.
416
posted on
11/18/2004 2:51:22 PM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)
To: Laura Earl
Free floating sub atomic particle.
417
posted on
11/18/2004 2:52:28 PM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)
To: Poohbah; Conspiracy Guy; nothernlights
Let's put this silly crap to bed, once and for all.
From the DOD rules for embedded reporters...
3.R. There is no general review process for media products. See para 6.A. for further detail concerning security at the source.
This whole thread was premised, 400+ posts ago, on the goofy notion that: "Was not the reporter under the duty to hand over this tape to military authorities,under the rules of imbeds?". Well, it is now conclusively established that there are no such rules for embeds.
--Boot Hill
418
posted on
11/18/2004 2:54:57 PM PST
by
Boot Hill
(Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
To: Conspiracy Guy
True. But journalists used to have war footage and even cables or dispatches approved."Used to" isn't good enough.
419
posted on
11/18/2004 2:56:21 PM PST
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: Boot Hill
I know there are no rules. There is discretion. There should be no embeds. But I am not the DOD.
420
posted on
11/18/2004 2:57:04 PM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Kevin Sites is a terrorist.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 501-508 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson