Posted on 10/10/2004 4:47:01 PM PDT by LouAvul
Did you ever see that movie, "The Majestic", with Jim Carrey, where he was accused of association w/ communists? And his response, he just came to a meeting or two cause he just wanted to get laid?
Well, if you're looking for cheap sex, you'll get it for sure from the commie sluts in Northern CA, where you won't find it in self-respecting conservative women who are saving themselves for a decent man.
Those losers up in Northern CA equate sex with going to the bathroom, or drinking a soda. Their consciences have been destroyed, bad parenting, mostly.
Volunteer Park in Seattle used to be open 24/7. Due to sodomites meeting in the park for hit-and-run sex, however, the park now closes at 11:00 p.m.
You obviously didn't take math in the journalism department.
>> The sexually active teens here --- and there are many become lifelong taxpayer burdents. There is an epidemic here of chlamydia in the high schools --- the same one that have day-cares on their campuses. That's a very good thing for taxpayers. <<
A "very good thing for taxpayers" would be to relieve taxpayers from subsidizing this kind of behavior. Once the message sinks in that taxpayers won't pay the medical bills associated with unacceptable behavior, the problem will abate. It certainly may have to get worse before it gets better, but continued subsidizing of the problem will only perpetuate it.
I thought Bill Clinton lived in NY...?
You're an authority on Norhtern California, are you? Because that's not the Northern California I know. At least, it's no worse than any other place in the counry and probably better than many, as long as you are not considering the San Francisco Bay Area to represent all of Northern California.
Lots of Meth users in at least 3 of these counties.
Must be something in the water. The young are to well educated in sexual practices and to well equipped to be at fault themselves.
Do I sense a certain schadefreude here? This is nothing to clap about, folks!
Absolutely. Why should taxpayers (that includes you and me) be forced to subsidize the consequences of their voluntary behavior. We're not to blame. Let their parents take care of them. If parents were responsible for their children's misbehavior, they would keep their kids under tighter control.
Bodda-Boom! Bodda-Bing! You are correct, and that goes for ALL immoral, unacceptable, self destructive behaviors. If people got used to the idea that the bad consequences of their unwise behavior was theirs alone to reap, and that the good consequences of their wise behavior was their reward alone, to be shared with no other, most people would be more careful. It's so easy to spend other peoples money.
Scary.
Sterile and possibly worse. Last time I knew most cases of cervical cancer were linked to Human Papiloma Virus. I bet they don't mention that little stat in sex-ed.
I see your point. I know folks who live in the Sierra Nevada foothills (near Auburn), and my apology to them (except for the rabid enviros in those neighborhoods trying to run a guilt trip on the others for daring to live there).
Being that said, though, let's face facts. If a 7.5 earthquake went off in SF, the ripple would spread about as far as the commie/socialist-infected areas I'm referring to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.