Posted on 10/10/2004 2:06:03 PM PDT by ambrose
What do you mean THEM?? You mean KERRY!?
What do you mean THEM?? You mean KERRY!?
Great graphic Petronski!
The Dallas Morning News said that the debate was a tie and that Kerry was more influential on undecideds.
How did they know that? Because they are the DMN and they always know stuff like that.
The fact is that I personally know that Bush won the debate decisively.
I was on the live thread (as best I could) and this is the most critical bunch of people in the world. Oh, yeah, they were rooting for Bush like make, but they weren't gonna cut him a freakin' bit of slack.
These people are hard. Very hard.
So, that's how I know that Bush won the second debate and don't even think about arguing with me.
well actually several others called it but Zogby was the 1st to identify the trend....BTW he was way way off on the midterms in 2002
Some may mock this but rather than watch the debate on Friday, I turned on EWTN said the Rosary and the Stations of the Cross.
I love this picture of President Bush, but every time I see it I think of the Teletubbies.
What was Zogby's results for the 02 midterms? I've wondered that. I remember the NY Times disregarded its own final poll because it predicted a Republican slaughter (I think it had Republicans 47, Dems 40).
He sure was. Hopefully Bush and the GOP can get another late surge going.
They will never get to Bush 110% Kerry 46%.
Interesting. Never looked at it like that. There were several states that were decided by less than 2% though.
Considering his nationality, and his bias, that's not bad.
My husband is the only person I know, besides myself, who is defintely voting for President Bush. As for the rest of people we know voting for sKerry, I've noticed one consistent thing about them - they are weak people. They are weak and afraid and are dependent on goverment to take care of them. We recently met old friends who told us that one of their children, who went to college, got himself a job in Staten Island as a garbage man. They are thrilled. Go figure.
I'll nominate that for the Quote Of The Day!!
So in other words they (sKerry & Co) have bought their audience? If so then I think we'd better take advantage of it & suck up some of their free money too eh?
On the other hand I dont think most people here have that kind of stress-endurance to endure more than 3 minutes of sKerry lies & bloviating!
I second that. Just think, to never have to look at another panty waist liberal dirtying up the WH.
I for one, would be clubbed to death by the the people of tolerance and diversity for screaming things like LIAR and TRADER and of course, COWARD..the money probably wouldn't cover the medical..
What are you talking about?
http://www.nationalreview.com/babbin/babbin200410080833.asp
233 members of Congress have visited the troops in Iraq so far.
One hundred ninety-one were House members: 121 Republicans, and 70 Democrats.
Forty-two were senators: 24 Republicans and 18 Dems.
Eight senators have made two trips, and one has made three.
Neither Kerry nor Edwards has taken
time away from manicures, hairstyling appointments, and campaign
stops to talk to the men and women who are putting their lives on the
line in Iraq and to see the facts on the ground.
That's leadership for you.
The only reason Zogby caught that was because he was the only one that polled right up to election day, after the DUI dirty trick broke. All other pollsters ended their polling before that happened, so that was not taken into account.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.