Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Agonizing Choice
Creative Loafing Atlanta ^ | October 7, 2004 | Bob Barr

Posted on 10/09/2004 10:21:02 PM PDT by CJHughes

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: CJHughes
Creative Loafing? Boy that's an important journal. Bob has really hit the big time if he gets published in Creative Loafing.
41 posted on 10/09/2004 10:57:20 PM PDT by DestroytheDemocrats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJHughes
I have two really nice suit jackets (and no matching pants); for the next planned "Dress-up" (my daughter's wedding), I have been informed that I must be first fitted for and rent a Tux;

My wife worries about the important one, as yet unscheduled.

I find myself reminding her that that one will only be seen from the waist down.

42 posted on 10/09/2004 10:57:27 PM PDT by Old Professer (Fear is the fountain of hostility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helms

Gee, i didin't read anything about Barr mentioning his own name.


43 posted on 10/09/2004 10:57:30 PM PDT by Cheapskate ("We got the Steeley Dan t shirts!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: petrotsky
But there is such a thing as letting an issue, like expanding government, get out of control due to neglect.

Oh, I agree. But the time to voice criticisms like this -- especially for someone in Barr's position -- is after the election. The problem certainly isn't going to get any better if Kerry wins.

44 posted on 10/09/2004 10:58:42 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: HollywoodRepublican
real-life conservatives know that this election is about the war, and it isn't about anything else.

Would that be the war on drugs, the war on poverty, the war on illiteracy, the war on high prescription drug costs, the war on privacy, the war on wealth, the war on high gas prices, or the war on terror?

45 posted on 10/09/2004 11:00:26 PM PDT by CJHughes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cheapskate

Love the Dan but he is the author.


46 posted on 10/09/2004 11:01:27 PM PDT by Helms (nu-ance : [ from KERRY French, from nuer, to Shade the Truth via Language and Subvert Reality])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CJHughes

BBarr let us down during the Waco hearings. He came on like the prosecutor and then melted away leaving the show to Zoftgren et al.


47 posted on 10/09/2004 11:01:40 PM PDT by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJHughes
I guess most of the naysayers above can't comprehend the message Hugh Hewitt delivers to his audience on a daily basis.

W is not Perfect. Ronaldus Magnus was not Perfect. Abraham Lincoln was not Perfect.

Only GOD Himself is Perfect.

sKerry is the path less traveled ..... for good reason.
48 posted on 10/09/2004 11:01:59 PM PDT by 1iron ("Let not your heart be troubled ... this, too, shall pass.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CJHughes

Barr is insincere...

He knows that the Congress still controls much of the spending.


49 posted on 10/09/2004 11:03:40 PM PDT by TFine80 (DK'S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Bob Barr has become a puzzle. Why come out three weeks before an unbelievably tight election and throw sand in the president's face? He has to know that fighting the war and creating an entire new department for homeland security has caused the body of the deficit. Larry Kudlow knows it, Bob Barr must have heard rumors. This makes no sense.


50 posted on 10/09/2004 11:05:20 PM PDT by Deb (A Democrat Stole My GREEN Sweater!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poincare
BBarr let us down during the Waco hearings.

Everyone let us down during the Waco hearings. (We let ourselves down for not taking the situation in Waco into our own hands....)

51 posted on 10/09/2004 11:05:46 PM PDT by CJHughes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Deb

It only makes sense to me if you are talking about a person who wants to be in the spotlight. Get press coverage for supporting the president? Not much. "throwing sand" at the president, now that's another thing. MSM eats it up. And so does everyone else.


52 posted on 10/09/2004 11:08:22 PM PDT by Laptop_Ron (John Kerry is really Joe Isuzu in disguise. Pass it on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Deb

$$$$$$$$. The guy is bought. The guy was not very employable and took the scraps which were offered.


53 posted on 10/09/2004 11:10:58 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Deb

By the way, Barr's suggestion that Bush's base is eroding is total BS, per every poll that I have seen. Every poll I have seen suggests Pubbies support Bush by 90%+, which is near unanimous. The "conservatives" who claim they are disillusioned with Bush to the point that they get a hard on by the prospect of his defeat, did not vote for him last time. They are either fringers or trolls in most cases.


54 posted on 10/09/2004 11:14:53 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Torie
They are either fringers or trolls in most cases.

Does valuing real American freedom over nebulous assurances of "safety" qualify one as a "fringer?"

55 posted on 10/09/2004 11:19:50 PM PDT by CJHughes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: CJHughes

These brownshirts certainly are bitter after they've been exposed.


56 posted on 10/09/2004 11:20:47 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Agreed. The numbers go up...the numbers go down, but the base is always solidly for Bush in every poll I've seen.

Wasn't Barr going to run again in his old district?

57 posted on 10/09/2004 11:25:08 PM PDT by Deb (A Democrat Stole My GREEN Sweater!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kesg
But the time to voice criticisms like this -- especially for someone in Barr's position -- is after the election.

If criticism is needed, it should be voiced immediately upon recognition. Any system operating strictly on positive feedback will go wildly out of control.

Barr, like many on FR, has watched both parties move further to the left. While his barbs appear to be aimed at Bush, they are in fact aimed at the GOP leadership. Whether we like to admit it or not, Bush and Kerry are just figureheads for their parties -- or more accurately, for the faceless interest groups who control the parties.

58 posted on 10/09/2004 11:27:58 PM PDT by JackelopeBreeder (Proud to be a mean-spirited and divisive loco gringo armed vigilante terrorist cucaracha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CJHughes

Since when does "real American freedom" mean freedom from a deficit? What a stupid argument.


59 posted on 10/09/2004 11:30:20 PM PDT by Deb (A Democrat Stole My GREEN Sweater!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


60 posted on 10/09/2004 11:30:31 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson