Skip to comments.
Obama is Alive and Hiding in.....Pakistan? (Serious vanity...:-)
EV
| September 28th, 2004
| EV
Posted on 09/28/2004 7:15:06 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-338 next last
To: EternalVigilance
No, he's simply being realistic. Besides, Keyes stepped off the deep end with his decidely non-conservative comments about Affirmative Action and Slavery Reparations. He's a candidate of opportunity, and the GOP in Illinois was doomed the minute that Ryan's character was exposed. There is No Way Obama loses this unless he contracts a disease and dies ...
Actually, in this state, he'd probably win by a bigger margin since it would be a direct appeal to a sizeable portion of the electorate: the dead.
21
posted on
09/28/2004 7:34:07 PM PDT
by
alancarp
(When does it cease to be "Freedom of the Press" and become outright SEDITION?)
To: RWR8189
We'll take it.
Bring friends.
22
posted on
09/28/2004 7:34:20 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
To: RedBloodedAmerican
23
posted on
09/28/2004 7:34:36 PM PDT
by
malakhi
To: alancarp
So, you'd rather have Obama, eh?
24
posted on
09/28/2004 7:34:57 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
To: malakhi
He's not even getting all the GOP vote.
To: RWR8189
keyes got ripped for moving to illinois to run....but the media in chicago isn't ripping obamasama for moving out of state....
ryan could have had a shot....if he would have stayed in...
i really think he could have gotten the swinger vote....
To: alancarp
No, he's simply being realistic. Back in Revolutionary War days, 'realists' were called Tories.
27
posted on
09/28/2004 7:36:19 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
To: Waywardson
28
posted on
09/28/2004 7:37:12 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
To: EternalVigilance
29
posted on
09/28/2004 7:37:20 PM PDT
by
malakhi
To: dreamerintexas
Edgar was the only person who could have won.
30
posted on
09/28/2004 7:37:48 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: unspun
31
posted on
09/28/2004 7:37:50 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
To: EternalVigilance
Of course not. But (1) We're GONNA have Obama. Period. That's the realism part -- Obama may be the biggest Senate winner in the Country on Nov 2; and (2) if I have precious time and money to spend on a candidate, it's on a contested race -- like my Burr vs. Bowles contest in NC. It's still winnable.
32
posted on
09/28/2004 7:38:22 PM PDT
by
alancarp
(When does it cease to be "Freedom of the Press" and become outright SEDITION?)
To: EternalVigilance
We are doing the hard work of rebuilding. Is Mr. Keyes planning on staying in Illinois after the November election?
33
posted on
09/28/2004 7:38:36 PM PDT
by
malakhi
To: malakhi
keyes won't stay in illinois after the election....but neither will obama (the seiu candidate)
To: EternalVigilance
Let me know when he hits 20% in the polls, that may be moral victory time for Alan.
Big stupid mistake for Illinois Republicans. A hamster would have gotten more votes.
35
posted on
09/28/2004 7:39:59 PM PDT
by
Central Scrutiniser
(Tax Protesters without SSN's are complete and total LOSERS!)
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Who has the other 49? Got a link?
Actually, the last poll I saw was a Survey USA poll showing a 65-24 edge for Obama. Remember, the poster said a 51 point margin.
36
posted on
09/28/2004 7:40:35 PM PDT
by
Hurricane Andrew
(History teaches that wars begin when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.)
To: Central Scrutiniser
A hamster would have gotten more votes. Hamtaro for Senate! :o)
37
posted on
09/28/2004 7:41:23 PM PDT
by
malakhi
To: malakhi
He is cute! And probably has a better grasp on reality! Where can I donate?
38
posted on
09/28/2004 7:42:37 PM PDT
by
Central Scrutiniser
(Tax Protesters without SSN's are complete and total LOSERS!)
To: malakhi
It's not useless. We're trying to elect conservatives.
Why don't you go pick on Daschle or something...
39
posted on
09/28/2004 7:45:59 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
To: RWR8189
"If...the race looks tight by November I'll vote for Keyes, but I just don't see it happening."
Why wouldn't you vote for him anyway? I still remember when Giuliani ran the second time (when he won for the first time) and my liberal friend and I actually knew more people who were going to vote for the Conservative Party candidate than for Giuliani. That was all because of the candidates views on abortion, but it was interesting, esp. for my friend who learned her Jewish co-worker was a staunch, single-issue, pro-life voter. But that was just anecdotal, as history records it Rudy won.
But who will you vote for if Keyes looks a loser? Obama? Some other person? There is NO SUCH THING as a thrown away vote!
40
posted on
09/28/2004 7:47:02 PM PDT
by
jocon307
(Ann Coulter was right)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-338 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson