Skip to comments.
Soviets Planned 'Invulnerable' Moon Base
NewsMax ^
| 9/20/04
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 09/20/2004 5:39:43 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: wagglebee
Crews of four cosmonauts were to spend up to one year on the moon. Wow, that's one heck of a military base. Four people would have barely been enough to maintain the font balls on their Selectrics.
21
posted on
09/20/2004 5:56:21 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Federal Creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it.)
To: wagglebee
Details on the US Army's PROJECT HORIZON, a lunar outpost, can be found
here.
To: Kornev
We basically planted our flag on the moon, and own it. That is only one of the three requiremnts.
23
posted on
09/20/2004 5:56:29 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
To: martin_fierro
Wow, vintage John Byrne. I wondered what he drew before "Iron Fist" at Marvel.
To: plushaye
manned by beautiful but smart women in tight silver catsuits and purple wigs. Ohh, no need to remind me.
A certain pubescent teen spent many tortured evenings thinking about those violet pageboy haircuts and silver catsuits. < |:)~
25
posted on
09/20/2004 5:57:56 PM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(Fred Mertz is THE MAN.)
To: horse_doc
The chinese are still out there.
26
posted on
09/20/2004 5:58:20 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! NOV 2, 2004 is VETERANS DAY! VOTE!)
To: stevem
As the Russian planned their base, yes, it probably had little military value. But if you want to know what Robert Heinlein thought about how a base on the moon (and armed with a catapault for slinging rocks) could be used in a war against targets on Earth, I invite you to read "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress."
27
posted on
09/20/2004 6:01:33 PM PDT
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: Kornev
Whoever really gets a base on the moon runs the planet. UFO aliens Hehee...
28
posted on
09/20/2004 6:02:17 PM PDT
by
demlosers
(The FreeRepublic Pajama Press!)
To: martin_fierro
Those catsuits were as sexist as the short skirts on the original Star Trek series, but you're right, they did keep the male viewers happy. ;)
29
posted on
09/20/2004 6:04:55 PM PDT
by
plushaye
(President Bush - Four more years! Thanks Swifties.)
To: wagglebee
30
posted on
09/20/2004 6:05:38 PM PDT
by
meowmeow
(We are all Buckhead!)
To: spodefly
Wallace and Gromit got there first.
31
posted on
09/20/2004 6:06:03 PM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>disingenuous filmmaker</A>)
To: martin_fierro
"A certain pubescent teen spent many tortured evenings thinking about those violet pageboy haircuts and silver catsuits. < |:)~"
Is there any greater reason to return to the moon and make this dream happen!
Ad Astra (to the stars)
To: demlosers
The Dark Side of the Moon
33
posted on
09/20/2004 6:07:06 PM PDT
by
traumer
To: RightWingAtheist
I thought that robot was there first.
To: meowmeow
I wonder if Reagan knew something about that....
35
posted on
09/20/2004 6:08:06 PM PDT
by
traumer
To: wagglebee
36
posted on
09/20/2004 6:09:30 PM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>disingenuous filmmaker</A>)
To: wagglebee
I use to work with an ex USAF guy in telcom network control..his background was satellite control in Colorado Spring... We got to talking late one Fri night grave shift about the moon missions and when I commented that it was sad we hadn't gone back his response was our you sure about that... bottom line he hinted around that there was some US miltary moon mission in the 80's to set up a earth monitoring post ...the moon being the ultimate military high ground to monitor earth from
probably just pulling my leg but food for thought
37
posted on
09/20/2004 6:11:03 PM PDT
by
tophat9000
( “Old Yeller” Democrats is a Yellow Dog that has become Crazy & Rabid)
To: NickRails
I know. I just couldn't resist making a reference to W & G. Come to think of it, they did meet a robot in that short.
38
posted on
09/20/2004 6:13:53 PM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>disingenuous filmmaker</A>)
To: Ford Fairlane; stevem
true, and good book.
Nothing like utilizing the earths gravity well to propel moon rock to a velocity of ummmm 5 miles a second?
Resulting in a thermonuclear event sans the lingering radiation.
There's just that pesky problem of catapulting those moon rocks over the gravity well...
39
posted on
09/20/2004 6:16:00 PM PDT
by
TeleStraightShooter
(Sorry Kerry, you're 3 decimal places adrift: 3,000,000 not 3,000 "displaced"/murdered SE Asians)
To: wagglebee
the Soviet project was "tens of times more expensive than the Apollo project of the United States, which cost $34 billion. They could have always starved a few million more peasants to finance this insane project.
40
posted on
09/20/2004 6:16:33 PM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson