Skip to comments.
CBS Statement Expect Today (Per FOX news)
FOX NEWS
| 09/15/2004
Posted on 09/15/2004 4:37:57 AM PDT by tsmith130
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820, 821-840, 841-860, 861-869 next last
To: Tennessean4Bush
4pm EDT and no typewritten memo yet.
Maybe I should put on my jammies and moose slippers.
841
posted on
09/15/2004 12:58:56 PM PDT
by
Maigrey
(Member of the semi-naked blogger Political Operative Brigade. To H#ll with pajamas!)
To: thchronic
Can't they see how inept they look with all of the delays? A group of folks who are confident in their work don't delay a scheduled info drop of this importance for FIVE HOURS, if they aren't scrambling like headless chickens!
842
posted on
09/15/2004 1:00:54 PM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: tsmith130
why are there 15 CBS comment threads going?
843
posted on
09/15/2004 1:02:44 PM PDT
by
petercooper
(All I wanted to know about Islam, I learned on 9-11-01.)
To: babaloo
Chris is a Wallace, an acorn doesn't fall far from the tree.
Chris isn't going to say ANYTHING, which reflects badly on his
father or his father's employer, besides that, he is trying to sell his book and it affects sales if it appears he is politically bias, one way or the other.
844
posted on
09/15/2004 1:06:38 PM PDT
by
RetSignman
(Forever Optimistic)
To: sionnsar
I think they are waiting for the exact moment the hurricane hits land, viewers will be watching THAT.
I wouldn't expect him to say anything new, he'll probably say that CBS, being a highly principled news outlet, will not and CAN NOT, disclose their sources or even indicate what AREA, the source is. His legacy depends it and he'll fight to the death to defend it, even if he has to take down the entire network with him.
846
posted on
09/15/2004 1:18:47 PM PDT
by
RetSignman
(Forever Optimistic)
To: LayoutGuru2
Wow, 41,249+ views of this thread. 40,000 of those are mine. I like to run up the counter. ;o)
847
posted on
09/15/2004 1:28:17 PM PDT
by
tsmith130
("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
To: tsmith130
Carpal Tunnel, bank on it. ;)
848
posted on
09/15/2004 1:29:58 PM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: NonValueAdded
First it was fear of Rush ... now they don't want Hannity to have enough time to chew on it. Well if not Hannity...then they have Mark Levine, if not Mark...Laura Ingraham, etc. And tomorrow it starts ALL over again. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
849
posted on
09/15/2004 1:35:04 PM PDT
by
tsmith130
("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
To: petercooper
why are there 15 CBS comment threads going? I dunno...I only started one...this morning.
850
posted on
09/15/2004 1:36:36 PM PDT
by
tsmith130
("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
To: EternalVigilance
Before the advent of the internet and the rise of FReeperdom, how many other frauds have been perpetrated on the American people by the communists at CBS and their fellow travelers in the press corps? Search on Tet 1968. And it didn't start then either.
851
posted on
09/15/2004 1:36:49 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: El Gato
Does anyone know if a source gives you bad information whether a reporter is still obligated to maintain the source's confidentiality?
We just lost cable....but hey, maybe CBS will postpone again.
852
posted on
09/15/2004 1:40:02 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Peach
The pundits I've heard on TV say there is no obligation to protect a source if they've given you bogus info.
853
posted on
09/15/2004 1:46:55 PM PDT
by
tsmith130
("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
To: tsmith130
Thanks for that response; I've been wondering.
854
posted on
09/15/2004 1:49:02 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Peach
Does anyone know if a source gives you bad information whether a reporter is still obligated to maintain the source's confidentiality? Nothing in the law or the Constitution requires, or even allows, them to protect their sources in the face of crimal or civil court actions. They like to pretend the first amendment freedom of the press allows this, and some judges go along. However the first amendment protects freedom of the press that is the freedom to publish whatever you want, but I for one don't see where it protects liars and frauds from the consequences of their actions. It also provides no protection for those who would protect liars and frauds.
855
posted on
09/15/2004 1:52:09 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: AngryPatriot87
Isn't that the salt sucker from Star Trek?
856
posted on
09/15/2004 1:59:12 PM PDT
by
united1000
(If you can read this, thank a teacher.... and since it's in English, thank a soldier)
To: AngryPatriot87
Isn't that the salt sucker from Star Trek?
Ignore the question.
Well If I would learn to read I would have seen your first line before the pictures:-) At least I guessed right!
857
posted on
09/15/2004 2:02:53 PM PDT
by
united1000
(If you can read this, thank a teacher.... and since it's in English, thank a soldier)
To: united1000
It's now twenty after five EDT, where's the statement? I figure that if they haven't come out with one by the end of the evening news, they aren't ever going to come out with one. They'll just stonewall.
858
posted on
09/15/2004 2:20:30 PM PDT
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: El Gato
Are those morons at CBS still hoping this is going to blow over? FNC hasn't had anything about it lately, I'm going to keep watching though to see if anything breaks.
To: El Gato
860
posted on
09/15/2004 2:47:53 PM PDT
by
JusPasenThru
(What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820, 821-840, 841-860, 861-869 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson