Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Imagine receiving 100% of your paycheck!
townhall.com ^ | August 27, 2004 | Neal Boortz

Posted on 08/26/2004 11:05:33 PM PDT by n-tres-ted

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-447 next last
This is a good one! Neal Boortz is on the subject like a duck on a June bug. He says a current study is likely to show the rate can be 20% rather than 23%. Makes me like it even more!
1 posted on 08/26/2004 11:05:33 PM PDT by n-tres-ted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted

PING


2 posted on 08/26/2004 11:10:47 PM PDT by chaosagent (It's all right to be crazy. Just don't let it drive you nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted

Fair Tax?

I have a better idea. Put the Constitutional provision, tariffs, on every good and service entering the country. Not only will we pay NO taxes, we'll all have decent jobs when the factories and investment capital come running back home. Talk about a win-win.


3 posted on 08/26/2004 11:16:23 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING (He is faithful!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted

But I'm self employed...


4 posted on 08/26/2004 11:17:24 PM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer

FairTax PING


5 posted on 08/26/2004 11:18:28 PM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted

I've come around on this issue over the past several years. As a self-employed artist, it hurts me like hell to wait and wait for a client to pay, and then have to deduct 25% of that hard-earned, much-needed cash right off the top to feed into Uncle's gaping maw. In effect, for every four hours I work I only get paid for three. If there were no income tax, every hour I worked would be an hour I got paid for. That fact alone makes the HR25 an attractive proposition. When you deduct the costs of tax prep, bookkeeping, and records maintenance (and why do I have to pay to keep the IRS's records for them, anyway?), it sounds even better.

I will be very surprised if HR25 goes anywhere anytime soon, but I'm beginning to hope that it or something like it will eventually pass. Never mind the financial relief — the relief I feel from no longer having the IRS hold a loaded gun to my temple would be worth it.


6 posted on 08/26/2004 11:18:32 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted

AWESOME!!! Thats a plan!


7 posted on 08/26/2004 11:19:47 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted
You need a clearer picture? Pull out your calculator. Let’s say that a single mother with two children spends $45 a week on groceries. The removal of the 22% embedded tax would bring the price of those groceries down to $35.10. The sales tax at 23% would be $8.07. This brings the total price to $43.17.

WRONG! It would be right if it was a real 23% sales tax and not a tax "23% of the gross payment"

The groceries would cost $45.58...$0.58 MORE than before not including the new tax on taxes in "the gross payment".

$45.58 (gross payment)
Minus 23% ($10.48 gross payment tax ) equals.
$35.10

The 23% "tax of the gross payment"(including itself) is a 29.87% (30%) sales tax.

8 posted on 08/26/2004 11:20:03 PM PDT by lewislynn (Why do the same people who think "free trade" is the answer also want less foreign oil dependence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted
Why do they have to give a rebate to make it "fair"???

Why not just lower the tax rate and let us keep more of our money to begin with?

23% is way too high for a blasted sales tax anyway.

9 posted on 08/26/2004 11:22:52 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Alan Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted
The federal government would be funded through a national sales tax on goods and services sold at the retail level.

Which will lead to the creation of co-ops by which people will collectively buy wholesale to skirt around the retail tax. This in turn will create tax shortfalls that will ultimately result in the return of the IRS while leaving the federal sales tax in place.

Think it won't happen? Think again.

10 posted on 08/26/2004 11:25:01 PM PDT by Prime Choice (Democrats. They want to have their cake and eat yours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
The 23% "tax of the gross payment"(including itself) is a 29.87% (30%) sales tax.

30% !!!

Holy smoke, that's even worse!

If they REALLY wanted to let us keep our money, they'd lower it to maybe only 10% a do away with that phoney "rebate" nonsense.
If they have it to give back to us, they shouldn't be taking it to begin with.

11 posted on 08/26/2004 11:27:27 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Alan Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted

One glaring flaw.

Even if the "embedded tax" goes away prices will not fall by the same amount.
Many will see this as an opportunity to increase their profit margin, fund capitol improvements, ramp up research that has been put off, etc.

Small business runs on a thin margin in this country, the lesser tax's may keep them afloat, but not really allow them to reduce prices drastically.

This looks to be incomplete, but a good start.


12 posted on 08/26/2004 11:28:08 PM PDT by Richard-SIA ("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

ping!


13 posted on 08/26/2004 11:30:12 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Comrade Hillary - 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted

Sorry, no thanks. I don't want to pay $10 dollars for a gallon of milk or $7.50 for a loaf of bread.


14 posted on 08/26/2004 11:32:14 PM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
I've come around on this issue over the past several years. As a self-employed artist, it hurts me like hell to wait and wait for a client to pay, and then have to deduct 25% of that hard-earned, much-needed cash right off the top to feed into Uncle's gaping maw.

Yea, this way you could just wait and wait for a client to pay an additional 30% you'd have to send (off the top) "to feed into Uncle's gaping maw".

You say but wait I won't have income tax to pay...no you won't you'll have a new 30% sales tax to pay on some things you've never had to pay tax on before.

Even the article, claiming reduced prices by 22% says it comes out the same...so how could YOU reduce your prices, collect and remit a new tax, pay sales taxes yourself AND maintain your current lifestyle?

15 posted on 08/26/2004 11:34:11 PM PDT by lewislynn (Why do the same people who think "free trade" is the answer also want less foreign oil dependence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
23% is way too high for a blasted sales tax anyway.

Let's just think "Burger King" Willie!

If you can't "have it YOUR way" then it's a debacle and not worth contemplation.

It's a step in the right direction, is worth looking into, and does a fine job of lessening the burden of complication in the receiving of tax revenue for the government.

Complication reduction in itself would save a tremendous amount of government cost.

16 posted on 08/26/2004 11:35:08 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: n-tres-ted
20% sounds about right, and to sell this thing it is gonna have to "sound" good. I would like to see further detailed analysis AND it would HAVE to negate all other retail tax and not allow the "tax" to be renamed and reappear as a "fee."

The very best part of it will be neutering the IRS, no more "audits" i.e., government terrorism.

17 posted on 08/26/2004 11:35:52 PM PDT by TLI ( . . . ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA . . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA
Even if the "embedded tax" goes away prices will not fall by the same amount.

Of course not.
The shills are double-dipping with this incredible claim.

  1. They promise consumers that the savings will be passed along as lower prices
  2. They promise employees they can keep the money in their paychecks.
If employees keep the money, how do costs decrease?
18 posted on 08/26/2004 11:40:15 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Alan Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

The scavengers in the Federal Government will NEVER do with less money. It has to come from somewhere. The rich will buy goods elsewhere and skirt the law somehow; but small business will lose tax advantages. The income tax is ridiculous, unfair, and overly complicated, but I trust these fools implicitly to make it worse.


19 posted on 08/26/2004 11:42:44 PM PDT by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
If they REALLY wanted to let us keep our money, they'd lower it to maybe only 10% a do away with that phoney "rebate" nonsense

The rebate is all part of the scam.

It's not only a dangling carrot to suck you in. It's also a tax increase (where do you think the rebate money comes from?) for everyone spending above big governments arbitrary, one size fits all, we know what your "necessities" are and how much they cost you plan...don't get me started on how that poverty scam can be manipulated.

This from the people claiming to hate subsidies and welfare.

20 posted on 08/26/2004 11:43:02 PM PDT by lewislynn (Why do the same people who think "free trade" is the answer also want less foreign oil dependence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-447 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson