Posted on 08/03/2004 5:48:23 PM PDT by scripter
"GLSEN activist and New York kindergarten teacher Jaki Williams said starting in kindergarten is a must, since children at that age are still developing their ideas about the world around them. Even at that age, she said, the saturation process needs to begin.
What has always made this so completely and utterly underhanded and disgusting besides the material is the fact that they KNOW at 5 most parents will not even be broaching this topic so they are the ones to introduce it in a positive light. They seek to play stealth by introducing long before the parents intend to and without regard for whether the parent approves of the topic being taught regardless of its slant. SICK bastards. This type of thing is what convinces me that they are really out there hoping to recruit children. Why else introduce it earlier and earlier unless to normalize it and put it in a positive light long before the parents will introduce the topic? What would be the point otherwise? To stop hateful behavior? Gee, I"m only 34 and this subject was only minimally broached in health class as a teen--people my age seem to tolerate homosexuals just fine even if we do not approve of the lifestyle. The only way they could lend creedence to that issue is if there is a sharp rise in homosexual homicides committed by populations who don't approve of that lifestyle and it isn't happening which leads me back to what seems to be their ultimate wish and that is to boost their numbers in so many years via indoctrinating children that this is acceptable behavior for those children when they grow up.
Thanks for the link to the printable version. I couldn't find the original with a cursory look, but once at the printable version I found the link to the original.
What a sick POS creature this bastard is. What he's done counseling that boy the way he did was to put in his mind not only that homosexuality is ok, but that pedophilic homosexuality is ok--if this young man had any leanings that way due to his abuse, he's encouraged it. If that young men EVER touches a child, he should be made directly responsible for his encouragement.
I cry to think this young man was not told what he really needed to hear. That the man who did this to him was a sick predator gay or not and that he should not let it shape his sexual identity since it was not his fault and doese not mean he's gay. Someone as dangerous as Jennings, I would not put it past him using this young man's hurt to fulfill his own sick desires. Poor child, such a diservice done to him. Instead of "living with his boyfriend" if he'd been counseled adequately, he would likely be engaged to a wonderful girl and well on the way to healing from what was done to him. Instead he gets to live the abuse reaped on him over and over again--he punishes himself continually despite what Jennings would like to think.
This is so true and is the main reason for my tagline.
I think you either posted or pointed us to an excellent article some time ago. An article that is long but so very worth the read. It's an article that should be read by everyone involved in this debate. Here's a link to the article:
Defeating Gay ArgumentsIn the above you read about (among other things) the importance of defining terms and keeping the debate on subject. A crucial read for those who want hone their debate skills. Read it. Learn it. Use it.
NEA is not very high on my list of respected organizations...
And rightfully so:
The National Education Association: Emphasis on the Ass
We are all busy doing our OWN jobs every day, and parents shouldn't have to worry that their children are being subjected to influences they don't agree with or condone.
Indeed. Keeping an eye on and exposing the homosexual agenda takes loads of time and financial resources, and most parents and other concerned citizens can't do it full time. But the major homosexual organizations can, because they are well funded and have full time staff -- and their staff and directors are very well paid. It's their full-time job to promote their agenda across America. All day, every day:
An excerpt from "GLAADs Garry earns top salary among gay leaders - Compensation for heads of 18 national gay groups lower than association median"
"Joan Garry, executive director of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, had the highest salary among the heads of Americas 18 national gay civil rights organizations with a paid staff in 2002, the latest year for which non-profit groups were required by law to disclose salary information to the IRS and the public.
A survey of salaries of the heads of the 18 groups, conducted by the Washington Blade, shows that that Garry received a 2002 salary of $198,730 and additional benefits of $9,930, for a total compensation package of $208,666...
The 18 national gay groups are among the thousands of non-profit organizations in the United States that must file annual reports with the IRS disclosing financial information, including the salaries of their chief operating officers. The IRS, which grants these organizations an exemption from paying taxes on all of their income, requires the groups to submit the salary and other financial data on an IRS 990 Form, which must also be released to the public upon request...
In 2002, Birchs $201,486 compensation package came at a time when HRCs annual revenue was $20.5 million and the group raised an additional $7 million to help pay for a new headquarters building, making HRC by far the nations largest gay political group..."
Here are the salaries for 2002 that they have listed for the top officials of the top five homosexual activist organizations ( and since they have great influence in the public schools, the data for PFLAG is also included ):
Organization | Annual Revenue | Salary | Benefits |
Human Rights Campaign/ HRC Foundation | $20.5 million | $193,513 | $7,973 |
Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund | $7.6 million | $178,500 | $21,834 |
Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) | $4.4 million | $198,730 | $9,930 |
Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN) | $3.1 million | $152,900 | $12,232 |
National Gay & Lesbian Task Force/ NGLTF Policy Institute | $3 million | $150,000 |
Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians & Gays (PFLAG) | $2.6 million | $78,317 |
All of these and other homosexual activist organizations are supported by various corporate sponsors:
An excerpt from "Hurricane GLSEN" by Marc Fey, TownHall.com, September 28, 2003
"Its not just that they are generously funded, though they certainly are. Revenues for 2001 were $3.35 million, and this years conference was liberally supported by Kodak, Levi Strauss, Microsoft, and IBM whose logos were emblazoned on banners, brochures, and conference freebies. For the close to 500 people in attendance, including about 100 junior high and senior high students, the companies hoped to capture this powerful purchasing sectorgays and youtharguably two of the most powerful buying sectors in America today."
Who funds Homosexual and Lesbian Groups
And here's an example of how some of HRC's money is used to indoctrinate kids:
Human Rights Campaign Foundation invades saturday morning cartoons (My title)
( More later... )
wow - good stuff there!
While Clinton tricked us with the 'don't ask, don't tell' policies, these organizations were plugging away attempting to legitimize everything homosexual. Now look where we are.
You're welcome! I've been working on documentation and compiling links for your Index of Links thread. I hope to get some of it posted this weekend.
An excerpt from "Message of Voters in Missouri Against Gay Marriage Leaves Backers Discouraged: HUGE PRIMARY TURNOUT"
The spending had been lopsided here, with supporters of gay marriage spending $450,000 to fight the measure with television advertising and polling, compared with $19,000 spent by opponents.
"Still, we were just a little bit out-organized," said Seth Kilbourn, national field director for the Human Rights Campaign, a Washington group that helped pay for the Missouri opposition. "We can't let that happen again."
I think I'm going to get sick that Lambda brings in any money let alone several million a year. Truly disgusting. The contributors to that "special interest" should be under close scrutiny imo.
Naturally the leftists attack and show their famous "tolerance".
It is "Free Speech" when you are spouting their talking points. It is "hate" when you disagree.
BTTT
Well said. In schools they are indeed targeting children as young as kindergarten.
This is a must-read article. I've emailed it across the nation and the recipients have emailed it to others.
Bump!
Bump yet again.
Fascinating. Educators who want to present only one side of a story, and only one narrow, carefully vetted set of so-called "facts."
BTTT
This is a very significant statement:
Mr. Gutierrez, the son of a Pentecostal minister, says, "My whole identity had been swallowed up in my gay identity."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.