Posted on 07/18/2004 5:50:34 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
Michael clearly loved and adored his father. He has every right to be proud of his family name.
What is your real problem with this?
Who cares if he has? Just by speaking at the national convention of today's crazy Democratic party, within a few months of his father's death, he is spitting on his father's grave. What would such a man's "promise" be worth?
Nothing, I suggest.
No, no, no. My question was only whether or not he "promised" not to bash Bush.
I was curious about where that information came from.
I agree with you, he is spitting on his father's grave and his "promise" means nothing.
It just struck me odd that he would have "promised" anything.
The DNC can have him.
We throw back minnows, don't we?
Ron Reagan is Nancy's son. This may or may not blind her. Who knows.
Think Candace Gingrich....talk about being USED! Ron Reagan is a ballet dancer...the left can have him.
the guy has every right to his own political views and involvement, and we have every right to be disgusted at his behavior. The unfortunate thing is that he is being used by the DNC and can't see it.
Wasn't it the DNC that 'warned' the GOP not to use Reagan's death for political advantage? I hope the GOP speaks up about this.
BUSH CAMPAIGN ! H E L L O !
Michael Reagan should speak in prime time, full coverage, at the convention.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.