Posted on 06/04/2004 4:11:24 PM PDT by ambrose
Back in the bad old days of the 1980's we called that "mutiny and incitement to mutiny".
If this is the quality of inam chaplains then we must get rid of them.
..Then it follows they shouldn't be allowed to receive benefits from this country or become citizens. Why should the rest of us protect them?
This is normally an intelligence specialty NCO in the S-2 staff section; meaning someone with a security clearance and fairly routine access to classified informatin. Not good.
Yes as is third world immigration to the first world. Did you catch Hussein Ibish on Fox? He looks more like Baron Harkonen every damned day! I would sure like to extract his heart plug.
The Musli had no problem being posted in Kosovo I see. Maybe he helped his fellow Muslim terrorists "escape" Camp Bondsteel withouta trace with such security clearance.
I am suspicious of every Muslim I encounter and have been for many years, long before 9-11.
The majority of American Muslims are not affiliated with a mosque and many, especially Iranians, fled Islamic tyranny. What I am concerned about is that Muslims do possess a strong sense of solidarity with one another and that in a showdown in the Middle East even irreligious Muslims will side with their fellow Muslims against the infidels. Iranians may be an exception -- they fled Islamic tyranny plus they dislike Arabs and Pakistanis anyway. On second thought, the children of Iranian refugees may disagee with their parents -- Cuban refugees are strongly anti-Communist and pro-Republican, their children, born here, less so.
Modern public education teaches white, Christian children to be ashamed of their history. Westerners are demonized as the scum of the earth.
Americans are Americans and if you don't or won't defend this country get out. Muslims want what this country can give but do not want our culture. If you wont assimilate get out, this is not the melting pot of the early immigrants.
I wonder why a pious Muslim would choose to move from an Islamic nation to a non-Islamic one. From a religious standpoint, the one way he can justify it is by working for the Islamization of the host society. This is ironic -- he leaves a failed Islamic nation for a successful non-Islamic and seeks to replicate the old country in the new. Would an Islamic America be prosperous and free, or would it be an impoverished, corrupt, squalid pile of camel droppings like Pakistan? The relative affluence of a few predominately Muslim nations is based on: (1) oil or (2) the activities of non-Muslim minorities or foreign investment.
I read that McVeigh was either an agnostic or atheist. Before he was executed, though, he accepted the last rites of the Catholic Church.
this is tatamount to desertion and he should be shot.
I doubt their concerns were solely due to his religion. He must have given them other reasons.
It certainly does not sound as though his first allegiance is to America. If so, then he should be drummed out of the military that is our sole line of defense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.