Skip to comments.
Blix wants more information about sarin-filled roadside bomb
AP ^
| 5.17.04
Posted on 05/17/2004 3:51:52 PM PDT by ambrose
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
![](http://www.daviesgeneralstore.com/ebay/schultz.jpg)
"I know nothing of these matters!"
1
posted on
05/17/2004 3:51:53 PM PDT
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Let's let Blix have a sniff....
2
posted on
05/17/2004 3:53:36 PM PDT
by
oblomov
To: ambrose
Sorry Hans...you had your chance.
Nice Blix Bobblehead.
To: ambrose
The key word we'll be hearing the next few days (if we hear anything) is stockpiles.
To: ambrose
Who cares, or doesn't already know, what Blix will conclude?
5
posted on
05/17/2004 3:55:27 PM PDT
by
Spok
(In the good old days, men were made of iron and their ships were wooden.)
To: ambrose
Let's see...If a chemical munition was made in the past, then it can't be a stockpiled WMD? Will only those made in the future count? If so, it's a good thing we took out Saddam and destroyed all the WMD programs he had!
To: ambrose
Hans finally thinking about actually checking facts? whats up with that?
7
posted on
05/17/2004 3:56:00 PM PDT
by
SF Republican
(Kerry has all the qualities of a dog except for loyalty)
To: ambrose
Blix wants to nix the news that despite the malignant leftist's mantra there weren't WMD in Iraq, they were wrong.
8
posted on
05/17/2004 3:56:01 PM PDT
by
Peach
(,)
To: ambrose
He is such an arrogant jerk. I hope they don't let him near anything and I hope they don't tell him anything.
Just freeze him out.
9
posted on
05/17/2004 3:56:23 PM PDT
by
texasflower
(in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
To: ambrose
Former U-N weapons inspector Hans Blix is taking a wait-and-see approach... And he said he believes the insurgents who set the bomb didn't know it contained sarin. So much for waiting and seeing.
Sounds like his mind is made up. He is just now looking for facts to back him up.
To: DallasMike
It doesn't take a stockpile to kill thousands.
To: SF Republican
Let's ask Hans if he wants to be in the same room with the contencts of that bomb. If he says no, then we will all know that it was sarin.
12
posted on
05/17/2004 3:57:10 PM PDT
by
AngieGOP
(Now where did I put my tinfoil tiara?)
To: Peach
Will Blix ever admit Iraq was playing hide & seek with the WMD's from the UN inspectors.
To: Blue Highway
Nah! He'll never admit his incompetence and it doesn't fit his worldview.
14
posted on
05/17/2004 3:58:46 PM PDT
by
Peach
(,)
To: ambrose; hchutch
15
posted on
05/17/2004 3:58:57 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Four thousand throats may be cut in a single night by a running man -- Kahless the Unforgettable)
To: ambrose
Blix can drop dead. He is old news - - a failed incompetent.
I wouldn't show him anything. Well..... I'd show him my bare behind, maybe.
No. No, that might be risky....
To: ambrose
And he said he believes the insurgents who set the bomb didn't know it contained sarin.But Blix says it's too soon to determine if the shell was from the past or part of a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction.The two are not mutually exclusive. Binary wepaons have unlimited shelf lifes. Mr Magoo can't see the weapons for the stockpiles.
17
posted on
05/17/2004 3:59:52 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: CWOJackson
Blix= lame A$$ POS...would like to see him in that Iraqi prison yearbook...
18
posted on
05/17/2004 4:00:41 PM PDT
by
Ravens70
To: texasflower
Right. Screw blix. Show him nothing. Tell him nothing. Don't even contact him. Accept no correspondnce from him. Forget him.
FMCDH
19
posted on
05/17/2004 4:01:25 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(KERRY: "If at first you don't deceive, lie, lie again!")
To: ambrose
Who is paying Hans to do this inquiry, and upon whose authority has he the right to investigate? He is complicit in Saddam's subterfuge - the Oil-for-Food records prove that.
Hans - go home... if you can find it.
20
posted on
05/17/2004 4:02:48 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Any "church" that can't figure out abortion and homosexuality isn't worthy of the appellation)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson