Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: nickcarraway
A Redmond, Washington, organization I live just outside of, and work in, Redmond, WA. Is there nobody/i> who wants to hire an embedded systems engineer wanting to escape the belly of the beast...?
28 posted on
04/14/2004 7:29:44 PM PDT by
Eala
(Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
To: nickcarraway
" Someday a real rain will come and wash all this scum off the streets."
---Travis Bickle, Taxi Driver
31 posted on
04/14/2004 7:33:56 PM PDT by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: nickcarraway
Sick freaks!!!
To: nickcarraway
The e****n professor .....
"He writes of a certain "trend for certain vocal elements in education and the media in American culture to sharply question the legitimacy of many, if not all, sex role distinctions in the socialization of children." In other words....normal people should shut up.
34 posted on
04/14/2004 7:44:31 PM PDT by
goodnesswins
(Tagging you.....)
To: nickcarraway
Get ready for this to come on even stronger if they are emboldened, socially and legally, by Supreme Court-ordered homosexual marriage.
To: nickcarraway
"George A. Rekers, Ph.D., research director for child and adolescent psychiatry at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, writes in his article on childhood Gender Identity Disorder.And just what the hell is that supposed to mean?
Anyone who sends a child to a quack like that is guilty of child abuse.
To: nickcarraway
You gotta be kidding me...
Oh no wait your not.
To: nickcarraway
Preschool children who masturbate? I'm not THAT old and I think it was roughly 4th grade before me and my friends got over the "girls have germs" thing. Why is it that I think this has more to do with the "Doctors" and their agenda than, you know, a five year old wondering if it's okay to jerk off in front of the class?
40 posted on
04/14/2004 7:56:09 PM PDT by
jpf
To: nickcarraway; All
""Children who masturbate will be guided to understand that this is personal behavior and is appropriate for private time but not group time...." In group time it will be known as a "circle jerk."
41 posted on
04/14/2004 7:56:58 PM PDT by
davisfh
To: nickcarraway
Why are we even discussing sexuality with pre-schoolers. They are usually into things like coloring, matchbox cars, dolls, dirt, and teddy bears.
Last time I checked most pre-school aged kids had just mastered the fine art of using modern indoor toilets and these people are worried about explaining sexual behaviors?
I gotta tell I musta missed something.
To: nickcarraway
Group pushes homosexuality acceptance for toddlersPhwewww.....!
Those Democrats are sick.
To: nickcarraway
round these "people" up and feed them to sharks
47 posted on
04/14/2004 8:05:33 PM PDT by
Charlespg
(Civilization and freedom are only worthy of those who defend or support defending It)
To: nickcarraway
I normally just ignore the homosexual threads here at FreeRepublic.
I'm a 74 year old grandma with a wonderful grandson who visits me often and telephones me almost every day. He's 16 and a sophomore in high school.
He used my Internet Explorer this evening while I was doing the dishes, as he was nice enough to join me for dinner. When I logged on later in the evening, I hit the pull down address menu in IE and was somewhat surprised to see two websites that I do not normally visit: thestudnextdoor.com and bearfur.com
I'm shocked. These are homo websites. What's a gradma to do?
50 posted on
04/14/2004 8:09:33 PM PDT by
spald
To: nickcarraway
If we were serious about this nature vs nurture debate we would take about one hundred children, split them into two groups of 50 and set one group loose in the zoo apart from the other animals and provide food and shelter only while we put the other 50 in the homes of the top 50 medical professionals in the country from all disciplines and then revisit them in about 20 years.
To: little jeremiah; EdReform
The Childcare Exchange has two articles on its website exploring the possible methods to teach very small children to accept and practice homosexual behavior and cross-dressing. The homoesexual agenda never sleeps.
69 posted on
04/14/2004 8:36:18 PM PDT by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
To: nickcarraway; CyberCowboy777; Spanaway Lori; big ern; American Sovereignty Defender; Eala; ...
Cyber immediate PING request! This is SICK and should be exposed to the light of day!
To: nickcarraway
If I knew this Phaggot crap was being taught to MY child, I'd be arrested for kicking the responsible "teacher's" a$$ until their nose bled.
This kind of flaunted obscene perverseness will get someone killed sooner or later. People have died for a lot less offenses than for shoving this type of crap on others' kids.
Phaggots just don't have ANY moral boundaries and have no respect for themselves or anyone else.
79 posted on
04/14/2004 8:44:17 PM PDT by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: nickcarraway
They're here, they're queer, and they're in your face. And soon with the help of the likes of the ACLU and the democrat party they'll legally be able to get in your child's pants and they'll be nothing anyone can do about it. They can't procreate, therefore they must recruit. No place better to start than with a malleable young mind.
83 posted on
04/14/2004 8:48:46 PM PDT by
DaBroasta
(GRID will eventually cure homosexuality)
To: nickcarraway
There is a greater problem here. Men are ignoring the natural order of things.
Real men will not let their wives work. Women have a purpose and role that no organization, government, or day-care can substitute. Women are
too valuable to children and our culture to spend their days at work doing some lowly job. Too many men in America have become complete spineless wimps. Too many men in America lack the will to standup for what is right for their children, families and country.
If we had women at home, caring for their children, real men would stand up to the government and demand deep cuts in spending and in taxes. The reason is simple, real men would want to keep the money that they earned to support their families. There would be many more conservatives if women stayed at home with their children.
If we had women at home, caring for their children, there would be a significant drop in crime, teen pregnancy, drug use, and other social ills. In essence, a neighborhood full of adult women, instead of latch-key kids, means you have a built-in, and most importantly, free police force.
If we had women at home, caring for their children, men would be busy making money to support their families, and would be come much more conservative on social issues. There would not be the time to worry about queers and other liberal agendas. Most liberal agendas are driven by people that have entirely too much time on their hands.
Finally, just to leave you with one thought. Which would you rather have your child socialized by? a.) Someone else's bratty kid. b.) An ignorant, liberally educated, politically correct daycare provider. c.) By an mom, that has experience as an adult in how to get along with people, and who has the capacity to love her child more than anyone else in the world. Which is better for the child?
You probably guessed that my wife doesnt work. I even let her wear shoes sometimes.
To: nickcarraway
There are no words in the English language that can accurately convey the evil and corrupt propagandizing of our young children, as so outlined in the above article. This stuff has got to stop.
Is it any wonder that so many people so wisely homeschool?
88 posted on
04/14/2004 9:11:16 PM PDT by
TOUGH STOUGH
(A vote for president Bush IS a vote for principle.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson