Skip to comments.
Iraqis Drag Four Corpses Through Streets
AP ^
| March 31, 2004
| SAMEER N. YACOUB
Posted on 03/31/2004 7:04:44 AM PST by Charles Henrickson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 481-499 next last
To: Anubus
Agreed, Kill them now.
To: Alia
No way can I look at those photos. I know what you mean. But I did at least link the graphic ones, so someone could look at them, even for a moment, but not have to see them all the time on this thread.
The sad--and, at the same time, scary--thing to me is all the children in these photos. Think of how these people are training their children! And desensitizing them.
To: Polybius
Great Idea!!
Can we start today?
To: 2rightsleftcoast
Build a wall around the suuni triangle and systematically empty the population of real iraquis. What's left over, deal with them in a manner that's befitting.
To: kenth
I was thinking the same thing regarding the press. How do they continually find ways to be safe when all other Americans would be in grave danger? Does the name Danny Pearl ring a bell?
125
posted on
03/31/2004 8:16:05 AM PST
by
null and void
(Don't worry about what people think; they don't do it very often.)
To: Charles Henrickson
Nations liberated by the U.S. in the last several decades or so, either by ejecting an occupying force or removing a tyrannical government.
Iraq
Afghanistan
Kuwait
South Korea
Japan
Germany
France
Italy
Norway
Philippines
Did I miss any (I think I did...)?
Did people in these countries other than Iraq respond to their liberation the way the Iraqis are?
126
posted on
03/31/2004 8:16:26 AM PST
by
StoneColdGOP
(McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
To: Charles Henrickson
look like Palistinians.....that goofy male-bonding appearence that shows they really think they have accomplished something in their little, dirty and unimportant lives....
127
posted on
03/31/2004 8:16:46 AM PST
by
cherry
To: zencat
I agree in that I think a nuclear or other extremely violent American response will not be helpful. However, there are other methods. At least a significant portion of the Sunni triangle wants us out. We should leave that area, but not the country. However, that does not mean we let the babarians take over...we just don't pay the price in blood ourselves. I suggest that we bring in Iraqi forces to institute control in the triangle. By Iraqi, I mean Kurds, preferably the remains of the Barzani clan. Or at least Shia forces interested in forcing the Sunnis to toe the line. Vary how tight or loose a leash we keep on their vengeance based on the actions of the Sunnis. Don't give them the chance to fight us...make them fight their countrymen.
Furthermore, it looks like these were civilians....there should be no, and I mean NO reconstruction in the rebellious area. Peace THEN reconstruction. Simply say that the Sunni triangle is too dangerous for civilian reconstruction efforts and let them wallow in their pathetic misery as their countrymen rebuild and get a leg up...an advantage that will only become harder and harder to overcome. Ensure that as they fight, they lose in real and tangible ways.
If they want to fight the authority...they fight their countrymen. But also turn those Sunnis who want to get on with their lives against those who want to disrupt stabilization efforts. Isolate the enemy, turn his friends against them and make sure that time is on your side.
128
posted on
03/31/2004 8:17:19 AM PST
by
blanknoone
(End the occupation! Bring the Troops Home! (from Germany)
To: risen_feenix
Actually, I rather like parts of this. I do think the entire town should be cordoned off and isolated. Then, the inhabitants all removed, searched, and individually interviewed while staying in temporary camps, in this case all with lots of international observers to see that everyone is being treated decently and humanely, fed, allowed to pray, etc. At the same time, the city itself should be searched thoroughly, house by house, inch by inch. Then, in small, escorted groups, harmless inhabitants would be allowed to go in and collect their belongings. No looting, or pillage. These people would be removed to secure towns and villages. Houses where any illegal weapons or other evidence of involvement in insurgency was found would be demolished and the inhabitants executed. Then after the town was completely cleansed, let the harmless inhabitants who wanted to come back do so.
129
posted on
03/31/2004 8:17:22 AM PST
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
To: Charles Henrickson
MOAB time. It's the only thing they understand.
130
posted on
03/31/2004 8:17:31 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first.)
To: monday
probably press of some sort but they could have been affiliated with a relief organization, or who knows?The article said someone in the crowd mob displayed a DoD ID taken from one of the corpses.
Probably civilian contractors, and perhaps some military escorts out of uniform (?). Brit and U.S. policy is that contractors are not supposed to travel on the road without a second vehicle and armed military escort.
131
posted on
03/31/2004 8:18:27 AM PST
by
angkor
To: Charles Henrickson
The average person in these nations has been taught to hate all non-Muslims, no matter what. Since the U.S. is their strongest foe, they hate us the most. I do not see this changing in less than a generation, and perhaps it NEVER will.
Given the attitude of the people, the only effective strategy for us is to make it hard for them to attack us. That means denying them the benefits of state sponsorship. We have already done so in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. It also means killing the leadership of the groups attacking us.
Although we have clearly made a good start, it is clear that the war against terror/radical Islam will last a long time. That is our weakness. Our foes believe we lack the political will necessary to sustain the battle.
Most of Europe is already neutralized, and will fall with the slightest push. Spain surrendered after a single attack.
The U.S. is the only nation with the both the will and the resources to fight. Can we maintain our will to fight?
Can we keep the likes of John Kerry and Hillary Clinton out of the White House? Can we maintain a strong Congress? Can we do this for a whole generation?
Or will scenes like this, repeated over and over by a hostile news media, cause us to cut and run?
132
posted on
03/31/2004 8:18:41 AM PST
by
EternalHope
(Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
To: CGVet58
To: null and void
LOL! I-I-I-I-m-m-m-m s-s-s-s-sor-sor-sor-sorry ab-ab-ab-bo-bo-bo-bout tha-a-a-a-t.
134
posted on
03/31/2004 8:19:58 AM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Bharf-rat speak: "We'll do 'ANYTHING' to beat Bush!" Sounds sinister doesn't it?)
To: americanbychoice2
Yes, we must deal with these BASTARDS today!!!
The only way do deal with terrorists is to kill them
before they kill us. They have shown they have no
compassion. Show them none in return. I don't want to hear
one more word about the religion of Peace. It's a cult.
It needs to be eradicated.
To: Charles Henrickson
I know the link you provided leads to some devastatingly emotional stuff. I wonder at the power of the Internet! I still have a copy of the newspaper that dared to print the shocking photo of one of our bravest being dragged thru the streets in Somalia. I still have that newspaper because I felt it was a benchmark, a turning point in our national history.
It also reminded me, clearly and without a cloud of doubt, of Clinton's unfitness and inability to lead our country or care for our enlisted men and women.
It's probably easy to find that same pic on the Internet somewhere, but I'll NEVER, EVER forget the indignation and visceral horror of that news photo. After witnessing the inaction of Clinton's administration, I knew in my heart, it would not be the last photo of such an atrocity.
Blood-cultists, like these monsters are, do not have the right to live in a free society. But, if we were really as monstrous as the Dems would have us believe, we would unilaterlly nuke Fallujah and ask no questions later.
Saddam had no compunction about gassing Kurds who caused him indegestion. However, we are constrained to give a carefully measured, clear response to this atrocity. But, we MUST respond.
To: genefromjersey
You make some interesting points in your article. Why not post it here?
137
posted on
03/31/2004 8:20:43 AM PST
by
Eva
To: MindBender26
"One fights to win. To fight otherwise is to prepare to die."
I don't necessarily disagree. However, it is OUR political leadership which has couched the whole Iraq operation in terms of liberation and human rights. The bringing in of Western contractors, some of which were shown today how the much Iraqi appreciate them, to "help rebuild Iraq" is a symptom of this. What I'm asking is that was Iraq invaded to support strategic American interests or is it a mission of social engineering on a national scale. The latter is a hopeless exercise.
To: StoneColdGOP
We liberate them and THAT'S their reaction? These are the people we liberated the rest of Iraq FROM.
139
posted on
03/31/2004 8:20:57 AM PST
by
blanknoone
(End the occupation! Bring the Troops Home! (from Germany)
To: F.J. Mitchell
Could it be that Fallujah is so overan with vermin that nothing justifies it's continued existance?Yes. MOAB time.
140
posted on
03/31/2004 8:21:02 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 481-499 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson