Martha, Clinton and the media’s perception of rule of law

[bmwcyle]

Lies and the Liers that tell them. It is time for a change in America and we need to start with the famous.

[writer33]

“There is a simple question but a question of enormous consequence: Do we really want to remove a President of the United States because he tried to avoid discovery in a civil case of a private, consensual affair with a woman who was subsequently determined to be irrelevant to the case, which case itself was thrown out as wholly without merit under the law? That is the question,” Kerry stated on Friday, February 12, 1999. He voted against removal.

And it has still yet to really be reported. Now we know why he voted the way he did. He could've and should be next.

[cynicom]

Justice in this country is no longer a right guaranteed by the Constitution. Rather justice is for those that can afford it. A "lesser" person than Martha would already be in prison.

[FateAmenableToChange]

We acknowledge, after financially settling the Paula Jones suit, testimony limited trial, impeachment by House and Senate rejected both counts of impeachment, Judge Wright, who dismissed the Jones case, found the president in contempt for lying, when he denied the Lewinsky affair.

Commas are not this author's best friends.

[anniegetyourgun]

"Clinton’s legacy will never leave..."

Come now, everyone knows what his real legacy is. Just ask any teenager.

[ShelleyAa]

What I do not understand, perhaps you can help me. How is it that a lady that actually worked with stocks, did not understand that she was doing something wrong? And how is that a president of the USA, supposedly the head of the law in America, felt perjury was of little importance?

[Savage Beast]

"The real story in the Stewart case, as well as Clintons, may well be, how the media sought to deceive us, and are continuing on today."

This is true. Deception is the essence of "Liberalism" (a misnomer, of course), and the media is dominated by "Liberals". Anything that promotes the "Liberal" jihad is justifiable. Certainly deception is no impediment.

Those who have supported the Democrat Party and "Liberal causes" would be wise to reflect on the things you have said--notably selective law enforcement, approval of privilege for the powerful, moral elasticity, and faulty ideas of justice, that characterize "Liberalism". Such injustices and moral failures could well be applied to them, as Martha seems to have discovered.

[Cboldt]

It is time for a change in America and we need to start with the famous.

That would be the biggest bang for the buck.

[bmwcyle]

Denial is strong in the powerful elite. She was a victim of her marriage and now her success is not to go away either. She got greedy and thinks she is being singled out. She is only fooling herself. It is time for her to go.

[LADY J]

"And how is that a president of the USA, supposedly the head of the law in America, felt perjury was of little importance?"

Supposedly is the key word. This man was never the president of our country. EVERYTHING he did was all about himself.

Grade school kids are performing oral sex in the classroom - thanks to him.

[ShelleyAa]

Yes, his legacy will include having sex with a young woman just about their age, while married and on duty. However, history will not be kind to the president that committed perjury as the whole watched.

[Savage Beast]

"Liberals" love muddled thinking. It helps advance their agenda. It's useful in obfuscating the injustices that they adore. And it allows them to congratulate themselves on their highminded ideals and their service to cruel, sadistic, and brutal tyrrany at the same time.

[ShelleyAa]

Clinton truly was as George Will stated, the worst man ever to be president. Why would we ever want another like Clinton? The more I learn of Kerry and the more I hear him talk - what a "slick" or "sick" fellow he truly is.

[ShelleyAa]

How true.

[PeoplesRepublicOfWashington]

Kerry sanctioned perjury and obstruction of justice by the occupant of the Oval Office. By such action he is unworthy of occupying said office. W in '04!

[ShelleyAa]

I also wonder how individuals are able to make excuses for the likes of a Martha or Clinton. Are they not able to distinguish between right and wrong?

[Tribune7]

great post

[Paleo Conservative]

In addition, Clinton?s legacy will never leave; Democrats will see to it that it remains intact.

I don't know about that. If Republicans continue controlling Congress and Republicans keep the White House this year and elect a new president in 2008, perhaps some DemocRATS might start thinking that Clinton wasn't so good for them after all.

[ShelleyAa]

True. Why would we want someone leading the country that has a record of not being able to put politics aside, placing the nation's best interest in jeopardy?