Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Origins of the Slave Trade
scaruffi.com ^ | Piero Scaruffi

Posted on 02/22/2004 10:22:24 AM PST by paltz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 02/22/2004 10:22:24 AM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: paltz
Slavery is mentioned in the Bible WAY before 800 AD.
2 posted on 02/22/2004 10:25:50 AM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
To this day, both Arabs and Europeans maintain that the slave trade was a USA aberration, not their own invention
To this day slavery continues, from sub-saharan africa eastwards to the Red Sea, conducted by arabs as usual.
3 posted on 02/22/2004 10:28:42 AM PST by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Bush knew!
4 posted on 02/22/2004 10:32:44 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
it's in the U.S. that large sectors of the population would start condemning slavery, contrary to the indifference that Muslims and Europeans always showed for it

England outlawed slavery in 1800.

5 posted on 02/22/2004 10:39:31 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Yes, this is largely true. The one thing it omits is that the Muslims also raided the coasts of Europe for slaves, so that many of the slaves in Muslim countries were white. Probably there were more black slaves, because as the article points out they could be cheaply bought instead of fought for. But Muslim pirates and slavers were rampant in the Mediterranean for hundreds of years, and it was actually the American navy that put an end to the worst of it.

It's highly ironic that politically correct liars in academia have managed to convinced the blacks that Christianity is a "slave religion" and therefore that they should become black Muslims. Islam is the real religion of slavers.
6 posted on 02/22/2004 10:44:04 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
I remember reading that Swahili was not an indigenous African language but a contrivance of Arabs as a universal language to communicate with the disparate tribes they were commiting to slavery. Sounds good anyway.
7 posted on 02/22/2004 10:44:21 AM PST by fat city (Julius Rosenberg's soviet code name was "Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Very true. But England was not considered to be a part of "Europe" until pretty recently.

The Pope and the Church also condemned slavery at an early date. But that didn't persuade most of the European countries, who continued to profit from slave plantations abroad--Portugal, Belgium, France, Germany, and so forth.

The fact that they were behaving hypocritically and knew what they were doing was wrong is well indicated by the fact that the slaves were kept abroad. It was known that they were there, but "out of sight, out of mind."
8 posted on 02/22/2004 10:46:48 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Bump 4 educating..............
9 posted on 02/22/2004 10:50:18 AM PST by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Most of the South wasn't Islamic during the slave era. In fact, there weren't very many Islamic slave-based plantations during and before the Civil War. Other countries have differing experiences (and outside of Europe and the Americas, not much opposition to slavery.)
10 posted on 02/22/2004 10:51:53 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
For most people in the world, if you trace your ancestory far enough back, you will come upon a relative who was a slave or in servitude at some point.

Which makes the reperations issue a moot point.
11 posted on 02/22/2004 10:54:56 AM PST by motzman (OBL dead or captured by 10/31/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: motzman
For most people in the world, if you trace your ancestory far enough back, you will come upon a relative who was a slave or in servitude at some point.

Which is why white slavery (and I don't necessarily mean women sold off into prostitution) was a reality on our land. WHITE SLAVERY IN AMERICA

12 posted on 02/22/2004 11:23:25 AM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: paltz
The origins of slavery is in the fall of Lucifer. Ever since then human beings have been pressing peope into servitude and misery. Apprently it was barbaric enough for God to set guidelines on how to treat slaves.
13 posted on 02/22/2004 11:25:07 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
My sister had to literally have twelve copies of her passport when she moved to Japan. White slavery is encompassing a whole host of things these days, including the blackmarket white baby trade.
14 posted on 02/22/2004 11:26:43 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paltz
You will see his name pop up in black history month, but Benjamin Banneker's mother was a white slave. That's how she met his father, a black african slave. They were together on the same slave ship. You won't read that in the PC manuals.
15 posted on 02/22/2004 11:28:06 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paltz
Bookmark for ammo against the reparations nutcases.
16 posted on 02/22/2004 12:05:41 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paltz
BUMP
17 posted on 02/22/2004 12:33:36 PM PST by kitkat (Eat, purr, SNOOZE, eat, purr, SNOOZE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
Yes, and I believe that the reason that it was not widely condemned is that it was used as an effective way to treat subjugated nations...to keep them from rising again.
18 posted on 02/22/2004 12:42:07 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
The author specifically refers to the modern type of slave trade. Previously slaves were not bought and sold in batches except after wars when a good percentage of the losers became slaves of the winners. Without the possiblity of profit from selling or using those slaves they would not have been captured. They would have been killed.

Many more people "sold" themselves into slavery to avoid starvation. Judgements in lawsuits were another source of enslavement as losers tended to not have sufficient property to pay a judgment with money or goods.

Slavery was also an alternative to execution for criminals. Societies were not rich enough to afford years of food& for convicts so misdemeanor theft got you hung, or impaled, or something. No, the Arabs modernized the slave trade 1200 years ago. Before that enslavement was mostly an alternative to immediate death.

19 posted on 02/22/2004 12:46:35 PM PST by arthurus (fighting them OVER THERE is better than fighting them OVER HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
They were masters of innovation.
20 posted on 02/22/2004 1:00:16 PM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson