Skip to comments.
DENNIS MILLER SHOW - THURSDAY NIGHT
Posted on 02/13/2004 6:46:23 AM PST by 7thson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: theDentist
Ritter kept repeating that soldiers are sent out to "die" for their country.
I strongly disagree!!
He is like no Marine I've ever met.
Marines are sent out to FIGHT for their country and make the other poor sob die for his(ala George Patton).
41
posted on
02/13/2004 7:31:44 AM PST
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
To: GraniteStateConservative
So how did Colmes get on the show?
To: 7thson
I tivo'd Miller's show last night and watch the entire exchange. As a former Marine, his actions, his very existance makes me see RED! He sounded like he was reading from International ANSWER's talking points. Miller's response was measured, but you could certainly tell that he was extremely irritated by the statements being made by Ritter. Ritter is scum. He has defamed the United States, the US Marine Corps, and all of his former bothers. May he rot in hell...
43
posted on
02/13/2004 7:34:35 AM PST
by
GunnyB
(Once a Marine, Always a Marine)
To: Americathy
I also liked the book, however, when he has Kerry on the air, he mentions nothing in the book concerning Kerry voting to cut CIA, military, etc. I listen to him awhile on the radio but then I cannot stand it and turn on music. When I come home in the late afternoon, there aren't any good talk shows on. Let me correct that. Ron Smith up in Baltimore is excellent, but I cannot pull in his AM station - WBAL - down here in DC.
44
posted on
02/13/2004 7:34:50 AM PST
by
7thson
(I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
To: 7thson
Why does anyone continue to allow Ritter any forum whatsoever?
He should be shunned.
45
posted on
02/13/2004 7:36:02 AM PST
by
nuconvert
("Why do you have to be a nonconformist like everybody else?")
To: Huck
How does one argue with a hypocrite like Ritter? Seldom is an argument won by making a killer point that causes an opponent to concede unconditionally. What I heard Miller doing was quite subtle and effective. He chastised Ritter for the crass way in which Ritter insulted the dead and wounded soldiers and their families. This was in stark contrast to Rittter's sensitivity to the will of the international community which the US "flouted" by assembling a coalition of the non-French to prosecute the war. (He also called the Polish contingent a "joke").
Miller's interviews are like chess matches, not the chess games played by most TV hosts. The last thing we need is another half-bright Brokaw wannabe jousting talking points with an equally half-bright politico.
46
posted on
02/13/2004 7:43:40 AM PST
by
rmgatto
(lux et veritas (not heat))
To: carton253
LOL. Hey, I batter some of these pros. Hannity comes to mind. But I don't kid myself that I could waltz in and do a better job. With practice, who knows? Maybe I could. But what's the point of sitting in the back seat if you can't drive?
47
posted on
02/13/2004 7:45:07 AM PST
by
Huck
(OK. I'm over it.)
To: thesummerwind
It is a quirky untested format, and that is a challenge. No question about it.
48
posted on
02/13/2004 7:46:25 AM PST
by
Huck
(OK. I'm over it.)
To: alnick
Didn't see it & probably wouldn't have watched it because Ritter disgust me but I guess I missed a good show.
49
posted on
02/13/2004 8:04:53 AM PST
by
Simonne
To: alnick
Miller should have been drinking from a Burger King cup during the interview.
To: Drango
I think Miller needs to be looking for a new gig. Arbitron ratings have him at 0.3% share, half of what his opening was at a less thamn steller 0.6% If the trend holds in 8 months the only person watching Miller's show will be his mother and his crazy cousin Lenny.
Miller is a concert comedian and sketch type. He has to have a live audience to be effective. It's a timing thing. Ironically it was just the opposite of Rush. Rush didn't need a live audience for TV and had one. Miller needs an audience and doesn't.
51
posted on
02/13/2004 8:07:50 AM PST
by
tcuoohjohn
(Follow The Money)
To: Huck
But what's the point of sitting in the back seat if you can't drive?Well, don't be surprised if the driver suddenly stops the car and lets you walk home. LOL!
52
posted on
02/13/2004 8:11:35 AM PST
by
carton253
(I have no genius at seeming.)
To: tcuoohjohn
Miller is also a monologuist and a commentator. He can't have a dialogue or an interview. If you showed him a video of something and asked him to make clever comments, he could do it, but when there's a comeback, he's not as pithy. Of course, nobody is. The only "comedic" types who do talk radio or talk TV either do a prepared schtick (Daily Show) or do impressions (Brian Whitman and he's not always funny).
I think Miller might find his niche if he realizes he doesn't always have to be funny.
To: 7thson
I was looking to see if there were any threads discussing this last night! :) Here's what I posted on another thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1076406/posts To: g35x
Miller's comments [about the Kerry-Fonda pics] made me angry, too--I had watched every show up to then and cut him a lot of slack, but when he said that I turned the TV off in disgust and wasn't planning on watching again. However I knew he was going to have Scott Ritter on tonight and I wanted to see how he handled that, and I thought he redeemed himself pretty well--anyone else see it? He really took the wind out of Ritter's sails, I thought. My impression was that Ritter was trying to avoid Dennis' questions by using them as excuses to go into pre-rehearsed rants, but Dennis caught him off-guard by cutting into his rants with some pointed comebacks that Ritter wasn't prepared to answer. I'll give him another chance, though he does irritate me with some of his more liberal comments. Hopefully Ann Coulter will set him straight on some things :)
32 posted on 02/13/2004 12:59:42 AM CST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
54
posted on
02/13/2004 8:31:09 AM PST
by
Fedora
To: Roberts
I think that might be a false conclusion. It's been two and half years since the surprise attack that launched the Islamo-American Wars and what has changed?
We are referring to the people who died that day as "victims" and not "casualties", which would really put it into perspective.
We are being a fed the "peaceful religiion" lie, while members of it's radical terrorist arm have infilitrated our armed services and killed several, secrets have been passed on the enemy and agents in Iraq have been targeted for assassination and allied organizations have been attacked and killed.
The free travel of American citizens is being restricted as a result of political correctness, while al-Qaeda has succeeded in recruiting Caucasion agents?
There is no outrage. There is nobody confronting the Democratic candidates putting fire to their faces asking what would you do BESIDE using the UN, France, Germany, Russia, China answer.. There people are not out allies!
UGGGGHHH!!!!
55
posted on
02/13/2004 8:37:44 AM PST
by
olde north church
(Is it treason to oppose tyranny, I say never! P. Henry/me too! O.N.C.)
To: 7thson
Has anyone seen any rating info on Miller's show? I have seen numbers from his first night, but no averages, or stats since.
Has anyone else seen anything?
To: AmishDude
I think you have hit upon the right formula for Miller. A conservative version of the Daily Show. It is open , energetic, free wheeling, satirical, and has great numbers. The 'commentator' format doesn't fit Miller well.
If he continues in this format then I suspect you will continue to see his numbers slide. Will Rogers once said that the key to great humor and ascerbic wit is to take humorous point very seriously without taking yourself too seriously. I suggest that Miller has become bumptiously serious about himself and has let his craft slide.
57
posted on
02/13/2004 8:57:22 AM PST
by
tcuoohjohn
(Follow The Money)
To: Americathy
They couldn't find anyone who was either better or "prettier" than Colmes.
58
posted on
02/13/2004 9:03:14 AM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
To: KJacob
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/794346/posts ''It's not that I was lying or misleading anyone,'' he said of his earlier remarks. ''It's just that I said things very forcefully when the fact is there should have been a statement afterward, a 'but' kind of thing.'' Back then, he said, he was using his ''quantitative filter,'' speaking as an arms inspector about an unfinished job, seeing a cup 10 percent full. Later, he switched to his ''qualitative filter,'' seeing Iraq as 90 percent empty and enfeebled.
This is typical of Ritter. Even when admitting he is wrong, he is insisting he is right. His self-image requires it, for more than a life story, he has a personal mythology. Ritter, 41, loves the telling of it, which he does exceptionally well. In each chapter, he is the courageous man of principle, a stout-hearted citizen up against the dimwitted, the wicked and the power-mad.
..."
59
posted on
02/13/2004 10:56:02 AM PST
by
Shermy
( .)
To: AmishDude
LOL. That would have been subtle.
60
posted on
02/13/2004 11:15:00 AM PST
by
alnick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson