I could give you a list but there's a site someone posted on this topic. They go into in more detail.
You should go look at it and decide the merits for yourself. I'd say this site pretty much exhausts any possible critical examination of the Bush administration from a conservative Christian standpoint:
BushRevealed.com. It's a very conservative no-compromise Christian political site. And people around here think some of us FReepers are tough.
I would say that I don't take their every argument seriously. They have some tinfoil material. And we didn't elect him to establish a Christian theocracy. I do wish that if he's going to quote the Bible, he'd try to read the
rest of the Good Book and get to the New Testament. Still, worlds better than any Dim on Christianity. He's big on the Judeo-Christian scripture, I guess. Well, the Judeo part anyway. More disturbing to me is his calling Islam "The Religion Of Peace". I wish he'd call us Christians that just once.
Oh, well, maybe he'll have time to discover the New Testament in his second term. Heh-heh. We have to be optimistic.
Bush is quite adequate as CIC aside from some minor WMD/intel quibbling that'll drag out until at least November. He seems to put a real snap into the troops. Besides, it's a little late to hand Iraq back to the Baathists at this point. I don't see how Kerry can possibly compete with Bush in the CIC role, especially given his record of votes and speeches on defense, intel, United Nations.
I'm not trying to steer you one way or the other. Given your two major criteria, you may need to give Bush the benefit of the doubt. Or look at ways to elect more
conservative congressmen to help him govern better.
If your concerns are primarily Christian, kuma, and your politics secondary, George W. Bush has in no way disappointed you.
If your political opinions outweigh your Christianity, you may be disappointed.
I am a Christian first.