Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Space ‘Triumphs’ (Mars in another light)
the feared and hated lewrockwell.com ^ | 1/16/04 | Tibor Machan

Posted on 01/16/2004 4:07:34 AM PST by from occupied ga

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-168 next last
To: mrsmith
SO SELL ALASKA BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Louisiana purchase, also. I did go over the Constitution and could find nothing in in it which explicitly authorized either purchase.

61 posted on 01/16/2004 7:07:35 AM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Agnes Heep
Come; there's no need to be pedantic.

In other words you can't. If you're too dim to realize I was showing where I think the government is spending wasting money then that's your problem.

What you really ought to do blah blah blah

What you really ought to do is get over your inability to do anything except insult if you disagree and post a logical response if you're up to it. Which it appears that you're not

62 posted on 01/16/2004 7:08:22 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts; mrsmith
SO SELL ALASKA BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Since you two are so fond of the false straw man argument, how about getting back the $trillion of so that the government spent unconstitutionally on welfare over the last 40 years or so? And since you seem to hold the constitution in such low regard, then what do you think should be the criteria on which taxation and spending is based? Majority vote? Politician's whim? Do you think there should be any limits on taxation and government spending at all? If so what?

63 posted on 01/16/2004 7:15:04 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Okay, do you think the interstate highway system is a positive or negative thing? I see no mention of it in the Constitution.
64 posted on 01/16/2004 7:21:02 AM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
In other words you can't. If you're too dim to realize I was showing where I think the government is spending wasting money then that's your problem.

Nice try, but I don't think so. You were trying to let us know how bright and principled and politically astute you are.

65 posted on 01/16/2004 7:23:11 AM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: sonofatpatcher2
Listen campers, the only way to treat "from occupied ga" is to ignore him ...

Bingo!

66 posted on 01/16/2004 7:24:25 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
You're using the strawman.
The question is only whether it is wise to spend hard earned tax dollars on such ventures.

The constitutionality of it was settled for me hundreds of years ago by the acts of the people who founded our country.

I'm sorry you hold our Founders decisions in such low regard. But many living constitutionalists do.

67 posted on 01/16/2004 7:29:48 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Agnes Heep
You were trying to let us know how bright and principled and politically astute you are.

OK I admit it. I'm smarter, more principled and more politically astute than you are.

68 posted on 01/16/2004 7:33:30 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
The constitutionality of it was settled for me hundreds of years ago by the acts of the people who founded our country.

You've never read it have you?

69 posted on 01/16/2004 7:34:35 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
OK I admit it. I'm smarter, more principled and more politically astute than you are.

Are you trying to say that you have more brains in your whole head than I've got in my little finger?

70 posted on 01/16/2004 7:36:03 AM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
I read the one our Founders wrote, ratified and practised.

The one that means nothing to you.

71 posted on 01/16/2004 7:36:56 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion
Can I be Interior Minister or head of the USGS sire? :)
72 posted on 01/16/2004 7:41:56 AM PST by Axenolith (<tag>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith
How much tribute will you pay for the privilige?
73 posted on 01/16/2004 7:42:50 AM PST by American_Centurion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
The Louisiana Purchase was an obviously good deal: lots of fertile lands and the opening of the Mississippi river that we'd wanted since before the revolution.

But Alaska was just like the Moon: a cold far-away wasteland with apparently nothing we'd ever want.
I'm amazed we bought it since the only good reason to was a rather vague national defence one.

74 posted on 01/16/2004 7:47:10 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
Okay, do you think the interstate highway system is a positive or negative thing? I see no mention of it in the Constitution.

Good question. Section 8 Clause 7 "To establish Post Offices and post Roads;" Positive, but the interstate is paid for by federal taxes on motor fuel (or at least that is my understanding of where the funds come from) So in reality you determine how much you contribute to the interstate system by determining how much you drive. NASA, along with the HEW, HUD and other alphabet soup in Moscow Washington is direct wealth transfer, and not really a pay per use system.

75 posted on 01/16/2004 7:50:11 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion
All tribute will be paid in precious metals and gems. I'm sure the gracious regent will set an amount fair as he sees fit.

Hey! This monarchy stuff's kinda cool. It's like being a salaried groupie :)

76 posted on 01/16/2004 7:51:17 AM PST by Axenolith (<tag>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith
Not to mention perks like "stroke of the pen, law of the land, kinda cool, huh?"

Ouch! I can't believe I said that. (washing mouth with soap)
77 posted on 01/16/2004 7:53:50 AM PST by American_Centurion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith; Agnes Heep; 68 grunt
Many, many years ago my wife and I visited an old friend of my parents in Houston. It was in the mid-1960s and the race to the Moon was in high gear.

After dinner and a few drinks, the space race came up. The old friend's wife made the statement that we would never get to the Moon because it did not say we would do so in the Bible.

My wife and I were somewhat surprised but did not offer a reply as a person's religion is their own affair. There was a pregnant silence.

The old friend, an Aggie, took a swing from his Old Crow and said to not worry. "When we get there, my wife will find a passage in the Bible that lets us land."

I see a certain person among us who has still not found that passage, if you know what I mean...

78 posted on 01/16/2004 7:53:59 AM PST by sonofatpatcher2 (Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Agnes Heep
Are you trying to say that you have more brains in your whole head than I've got in my little finger?

No I'm just playing your little flame game, but you started out boring with nothing to say and that hasn't changed. If you have a good moral reason that justifies taking money at gunpoint that I worked for and spending it on pictures of rocks and dust just say so.

79 posted on 01/16/2004 7:54:29 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
No I'm just playing your little flame game, but you started out boring with nothing to say and that hasn't changed. If you have a good moral reason that justifies taking money at gunpoint that I worked for and spending it on pictures of rocks and dust just say so.

So now it's not a matter of principle but just a question of whether it's a good idea?

80 posted on 01/16/2004 8:00:23 AM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson