Skip to comments.
Martian dust devils could hamper future manned missions
SFGate.com ^
| 1/12/04
| Keay Davidson - SF Chronicle
Posted on 01/12/2004 11:56:35 AM PST by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:45:26 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: chimera
bump
21
posted on
01/12/2004 1:26:51 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Can some freeper verify the following info :
With the earths and Mars orbits taken into consideration what is the time between relatively close encounters (100 million miles).
A mars year is 686 days
Isn't is about 2 earth years ? That would mean the entire manned visit would be about that to. Six months to get there, a year there, and six months back.
I know it's alot more complicated than that, but isn't that in the ballpark?
To: NormsRevenge
Is it possible that these Dust Devil tracks are what that early astromoner saw and proclaimed as "canals", evidence of intelligent life on Mars?
To: NormsRevenge
Dear God. Then let's not even go. We'll just sit here, fat dumb and happy on this insignificant little dust speck and hope the universe doesn't notice us.
24
posted on
01/12/2004 2:22:44 PM PST
by
Junior
(Some people follow their dreams. Others hunt theirs down and beat them mercilessly into submission)
To: George from New England
I thought it took 3 years to get there with present technology.
To: George from New England
2 years up and back. 6 months one way, 18 the other. Short leg out or short leg back, your choice.
26
posted on
01/12/2004 2:30:43 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(How many technological objections will be raised?)
To: George from New England
Remember that it's a moving target. You lead the target a little going out. Kepler's Laws say as you go outward you lose velocity, so you need to be out ahead a bit. Likewise, coming back, you lag just a bit, and "catch up" to the Earth as you gain speed going sunward, just like Kepler tells us. You don't necessarily have to stay at the destination for a year. You can come back anytime as long as you plot the course correctly. It's not a matter of having to jump across the shortest gap, because you aren't going to be able to do that anyway. Here is something to try:
Something fun to try and learn from.
27
posted on
01/12/2004 2:32:51 PM PST
by
chimera
To: NormsRevenge
Have the astronauts bring haggliders and sailplanes.
28
posted on
01/12/2004 2:38:46 PM PST
by
hattend
(Mr Bush, the Supremes upheld CFR...what's your plan B? Too late to veto, now)
To: George from New England
It is obviously more efficient to wait for the proper alignment, about a 550 day cycle, but, if something came up, you probably could leave sooner or later if you had the consumables and could execute the course properly.
If we could move beyond chemical propulsion and go with something like nuclear-ion, then a shorter trip is possible. It just goes faster and closes the gap more quickly.
29
posted on
01/12/2004 2:40:07 PM PST
by
chimera
To: hattend
and hanggliders...a hagglider would be Hillary's
30
posted on
01/12/2004 2:42:32 PM PST
by
hattend
(Mr Bush, the Supremes upheld CFR...what's your plan B? Too late to veto, now)
To: chimera
If you could power it all the way at one gee, you might get there in a week. Not too hard to take, but it wouldn't be the Queen Mary II. :)
31
posted on
01/12/2004 2:44:56 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(How many technological objections will be raised?)
To: chimera
If we could move beyond chemical propulsion and go with something like nuclear-ion, then a shorter trip is possible. It just goes faster and closes the gap more quickly. Correct me if I am mistaken...it takes as much energy to slow down as it does to speed up. That is to say if we were able to do a continuous 2 week burn of fuel on the way out, we would need to do a 2 week burn in the opposite direction of the trajectory to slow down on the other end. Ignoring gravity of mars and the sun of course.
To: RightWhale
Please provide an explanation for the math impaired among us. Thanks.
33
posted on
01/12/2004 3:04:36 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Please provide an explanation for the math Of what? 2 years equals 24 months?
34
posted on
01/12/2004 3:14:26 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(How many technological objections will be raised?)
To: RightWhale
Why it is 6 months there, 18 months back
35
posted on
01/12/2004 3:28:24 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Or 18 months there and 6 months back.
It's how the planets line up as they move relative to each other. They are in the right place every two years. You could get 6 months up, 3 years there, and 6 months back, which would be two cycles or 4 years.
36
posted on
01/12/2004 3:32:09 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(How many technological objections will be raised?)
To: Dead Dog
Problems begging for a solution. Send a priest.
37
posted on
01/12/2004 3:39:27 PM PST
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: chimera
Sounds familiar. Life was "rough, even risky", for those brave enough to venture forth into the unknown in past times. Columbus and his crew, the Pilgrims, those on the Lewis and Clark expedition, the first settlers of Jamestown, polar and undersea explorers, the first astronauts, et al., all faced a measure of risk and hardship.
Before we landed on the Moon, the naysayers predicted that the lander and the astronauts would sink into the lunar surface because of ... THE DUST.
They thought the dust was too loosely packed to support a spacecraft.
38
posted on
01/12/2004 3:45:34 PM PST
by
rdbrewer
(generic tagline)
To: Normal4me; RightWhale; demlosers; Prof Engineer; BlazingArizona; ThreePuttinDude; Brett66; ...
Looks like the saganist is coming out in force now.
Space Ping! This is the space ping list! Let me know if you want on or off this list!
39
posted on
01/12/2004 5:05:23 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: farmfriend
Yawwwwn...dust devils are not going to stop Martian exploration.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson