Skip to comments.
Dornan to make drugs an issue
OC Register ^
| December 22, 2003
| MARTIN WISCKOL
Posted on 12/22/2003 3:22:02 PM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 last
To: robertpaulsen
Congress and the USSC don't need to reach into the Commerce Clause to violate religious freedoms. They can just go straight to the 1st amendment and violate that.That argument doesn't come anywhere near addressing the points and issues they're talking about. If you're going to defend Wickard v. Filburn and the substantial effects doctrine, those are the issues you'll have to address, and some of the people you've set youself up against.
101
posted on
12/24/2003 6:32:41 AM PST
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: tacticalogic
"addressing the points and issues they're talking about."And what would those be? Nowhere in the article did it reference a religious freedom curtailed by the use of the Commerce Clause.
What a waste of time.
To: robertpaulsen
And what would those be? Nowhere in the article did it reference a religious freedom curtailed by the use of the Commerce Clause. What a waste of time.
If that's the best answer you've got, then yes, it is.
103
posted on
12/24/2003 7:06:14 AM PST
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson