Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giving Thomas Jefferson the Business: The Jefferson-Hemings Hoax
A Different Drummer/Middle American News ^ | December, 2003 | Nicholas Stix

Posted on 12/16/2003 11:18:44 AM PST by mrustow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 next last
To: Ohioan
Thanks for the links. I read your eloquent article, but have yet to get to your correspondence. But I know what a devil Truscott is. He sought to force black non-descendants upon the Thomas Jefferson family association, thereby burying the real descendants in fraudulent, perpetual minority status, and destroying the Association. He has contempt for the truth and for established rules, and yet glories in the privileges that have been handed down to him by his ancestors almost as much as he glories in abusing those privileges and dishonoring those ancestors. In short, he's the perfect house Southerner for the Times.

"Yet hate begets hate, as ill will, malice."

161 posted on 12/17/2003 11:35:54 AM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Well, I found the Malone well-written and very interesting, but I was trained as an academic historian. Malone did win the Pulitzer for one of the volumes (at least) back when it meant something.

From your handle I'd guess you were a Southron like Jefferson, so your comment on Jefferson's financial problems and proclivities were somewhat surprising. I suppose if you're from a Puritan background it would seem strange. I think the most charitable thing that can be said here is the Jefferson's attitudes towards money were not atypical of his class and time. The British aristocracy, and the Virginia gentry in imitation, was typically land (and slave) rich, but cash poor. To conduct their lives at all, some sort of credit system of borrowing against future crops for both expenses and capital needs was almost essential. Jefferson's habits were expensive, but he was not, as were some of his peers, a compulsive gambler or rake-hell who spent his patrimony on fallen women. IIRC, when his father died, Jefferson inherited lands already heavily encumbered, and never worked his way out from under, indeed made it worse. As to his leaving his family, that, too, was not unusual in that period: men were often away (whether at sea or at war or for business) for years at a time. Jefferson could almost be considered a homebody by contemporary standards, except for the time he spent abroad or in Philadelphia and Washington in government service.

Jefferson's relations with women are not very clear. That he did not remarry is surprising, but, then, people took promises such as the one he made to Marth more seriously than we do today. Fascinating subject.

162 posted on 12/17/2003 11:46:59 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
TJ originally hired Callender to print lies about Adams but since TJ was a chronic debtor he was unable to pay Callender for his "services". TJ also lied to his old friend Adams about his sponsorship of the slanders Callender wrote. When Jefferson refused to pay Callender, he retaliated by printing the TJ/slave story. DNA testing indicates a Jefferson male did in fact boink his slaves but it does not narrow it down to TJ himself. Given TJ's duplicitious deceptive nature, I wouldn't put it past him. Jefferson brought this on himself.

Wow! That's news to me. It gives the 200-year smear a tragic, karmic flavor. Do you have any sources re Jefferson's hiring of Callender for purposes of libel?

163 posted on 12/17/2003 11:52:53 AM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
I read about the subject in Joseph J. Ellis's Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation.
164 posted on 12/17/2003 11:56:43 AM PST by AdamSelene235 (I always shoot for the moon......sometimes I hit London.- Von Braun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
Here’s what is known: Thomas Jefferson owned a slave named Sally Hemings.

How much more likely then, that Jefferson fathered one of her children. If she lived on his property, it would have been very peculiar for other members of Jefferson's family to pay a visit to his slave. Can you just see them sneaking around back, on an ostensible visit to Jefferson - it just isn't plausible. And how would such a relationship with one of his relatives have been initiated? It just makes more sense that a relationship would have developed between Jefferson and his slave - though, with him being in a position of authority, how much of a relationship would that have been?

If you have any evidence for the "wouldas/couldas" you just posited, I'm all ears. But until then, I think we should respect the crucial distinction between historical possibility and historical fact.

165 posted on 12/17/2003 11:58:56 AM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
Thanks for the tip.
166 posted on 12/17/2003 11:59:42 AM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
Jesse Jackson is Richard Milhouse Nixon's illegitimate love child. Micheal Jackson, too!

ROTFL

167 posted on 12/17/2003 12:04:24 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson

It matters. The truth always matters. Something is or it isn't,

and dissemblers and liars shouldn't be given a pass on manipulating a COUNTRY! The vast majority of Americans now think Thomas Jefferson indeed fathered kids with Sally Hemmings, and there is not yet conclusive proof of that. For those who would make political hay out of such a "fact," that national delusion is very useful. It matters.

Bump to that!

168 posted on 12/17/2003 12:06:31 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Thanks for the link. I downloaded the article for later study.
169 posted on 12/17/2003 12:08:22 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
Thanks again! Now that I see him in the context of his time I guess I am not so surprised. Except that Adams who was also a farmer, smaller than Jefferson however, hated debt, lived frugally and left money in his estate. From the Adams bio, Jefferson spent his money on books, furniture, art and maybe clothing. Anyhow, I guess leaving ones life in debt so that the heirs are encumbered just seems so alien to me even as a southerner. Jefferson seemed to just love to build, decorate, remodel and really loved to buy books. Not a bad thing.
170 posted on 12/17/2003 12:44:03 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Thanks. I just re-read what you excerpted, and realize that I was really riding a high horse there, wasn't I? But I also realize, such a ride is easier when you're right.
171 posted on 12/17/2003 12:53:56 PM PST by John Robertson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
The cultural differences between the New Englanders, frugal merchants and yeoman farmers reared in a Puritan environment, even such a sophisticated man as Adams, and the typically Anglican gentry that constituted the educated and hence governing class in the Southern colonies, was as great as the cultural difference today between an Upper West Side of Manhattan graduate of Harvard, and the owner of small retail service business in Texas.

What is remarkable is that the submerged (but didn't completely put aside) their cultural and regional differences in the creating of the American Experiment, from the War of Independence through the adoption of the Constitution.

172 posted on 12/17/2003 12:56:21 PM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Thank you for this post. DNA proves that Eston was the son of a Jefferson, but WHICH Jefferson cannot be answered without DNA from the mother, father, and offspring--none of which were tested. If they want to go to the trouble of exhuming all three and THEN conclude that Tom fathered Sally's littlest boy--fine. Until then, they are making an exact science into pseudo-science and rewriting history with a political agenda.
173 posted on 12/17/2003 1:01:11 PM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
But I know what a devil Truscott is.

Truscott, or, as his West Point classmates knew him: "Louce the Douce", has made a career of this sort of behavior. He was thrown out of the Army for his outrageous conduct at this first duty assignment, Ft. Carson. He would have been court-martialed, except for the reputation of his father and grand-father. He wore this as a badge of honor, claiming to have courageously stood up in opposition to the Vietnam warfare. Truth is that he was both a coward and a traitor, and totally devoid of honor.

He caused quite a scene when he strolled into his Class 10-year reunion dinner at West Point - barefoot in Black Tie with some Greenwich Village cutie on his arm. But, like many others on the Left - its got to be all about him.

174 posted on 12/17/2003 1:03:53 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
It is remarkable. I loved the part of the Adams bio when the author described the Virginians riding into Philadelphia on grand horses with their appearance being that of princes. The Philadelphians were amazed with them, they were like grand royalty. I loved that. Adams was so different and he and Jefferson were close for years. That is amazing to me. And I do believe Abigail was fascinated and attracted to Jefferson until she turned on him for being so backstabbing to Adams. Abigail added immensely to Adam's life, a shame Jefferson didn't have the same influence.
175 posted on 12/17/2003 1:30:19 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
I met Truscott socially in NYC in the early '80s. He was a regular in the old Lion's Head pub, a place with a certain following among the soused literati A rather self-important fellow, I thought, certainly not up to the family standards.
176 posted on 12/17/2003 1:41:51 PM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
About the same time when I last saw him. He certainly considers himself among the literati, but I think that your first impression is more accurate.
177 posted on 12/17/2003 3:19:34 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson
Thanks. I just re-read what you excerpted, and realize that I was really riding a high horse there, wasn't I? But I also realize, such a ride is easier when you're right.

Exactly.

178 posted on 12/17/2003 4:56:49 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: MHT
Thank you for this post. DNA proves that Eston was the son of a Jefferson, but WHICH Jefferson cannot be answered without DNA from the mother, father, and offspring--none of which were tested. If they want to go to the trouble of exhuming all three and THEN conclude that Tom fathered Sally's littlest boy--fine. Until then, they are making an exact science into pseudo-science and rewriting history with a political agenda.

My pleasure. It's weird when you consider what revolutionary strides real science has made in the past 50 years alone, and then see that in the social sciences, and the application of science to social controversies (e.g., DNA testing), we are marching backwards.

179 posted on 12/17/2003 5:00:34 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Truth or hoax, it's all part of the GLORIOUS AMERICAN MOSAIC!!!! (another part which is that intersection where
tabloid journalism meets "historical scholarship").
180 posted on 12/18/2003 2:40:49 PM PST by willyboyishere (HE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson