Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/15/2003 2:17:28 PM PST by ask
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: ask
It makes sense to me.
90 posted on 12/15/2003 3:43:44 PM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
"Maryland, My Maryland".....
106 posted on 12/15/2003 4:03:08 PM PST by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
I don't have to worry about it. I don't ride with or associate with anyone that uses drugs. I guess those complaining about the ruling will have to be more careful about who they run with.
112 posted on 12/15/2003 4:10:26 PM PST by mrfixit514
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
"You certainly wouldn't let three people with Uzis in their car leave because no one would admit the uzis were theirs," he said.

And why not?

113 posted on 12/15/2003 4:11:20 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
No more car pooling. Everyone must drive seperately. The problems with this verses our constituion and justice itself is just mind boggling. The USSC is the most anti-american court to ever exist.
115 posted on 12/15/2003 4:14:10 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
Beginning to wonder if Sandra Day O'Connor is getting alzheimers/or some other malady, like a brain tumor. Seriously. She's voting wacky.
116 posted on 12/15/2003 4:14:17 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
Guilt by proximity?
126 posted on 12/15/2003 4:58:57 PM PST by ChefKeith (NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yall
The Supreme Court issued a traffic warning Monday: Beware of whom you ride with. If drugs are found in a vehicle, all occupants can be arrested, the justices said in a unanimous decision.
It was a victory for Maryland and 20 other states.






The people of the USA were issued a warning Monday:
Beware of those whom you elect.
If 'prohibited' property is found in a vehicle, all occupants can be arrested, the justices said in a unanimous decision.
It was a 'victory' for Maryland and 20 other states, but a blatant violation of our constitutions principles.
135 posted on 12/15/2003 5:29:27 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out the Rickenbacker in me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
The Supreme Court issued a traffic warning Monday: Beware of whom you ride with. If drugs are found in a vehicle, all occupants can be arrested, the justices said in a unanimous decision.

Okay if that is the way they feel then we should hold them ALL acountable for the CFR ruling, not just the ones who upheld it.

147 posted on 12/15/2003 7:06:57 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
My heroes...

Thank you SCOTUS for rescuing us from that dreadful Constitution...

People have too many freedoms nowadays. Thankfully, they're being revoked on a near-daily basis now.
157 posted on 12/15/2003 10:11:27 PM PST by mansion (Voting for the "lesser of two evils" is still voting for evil...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
The facts of the cases in these matters are really really important. Many times the dealers will deal in pairs. One has the money, the other the drugs. Other tricks are to keep the drugs close in a container and not "on the person".

Really the facts do matter.
160 posted on 12/15/2003 10:32:05 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
The thing that worries me is the possibility of drugs being planted. It just became a lot easier to get away with that, and "persuade" one person to testify against the other(s).

-Eric

166 posted on 12/16/2003 5:48:49 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
169 posted on 12/16/2003 8:28:22 AM PST by jmc813 (Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
Rehnquist has been an aggressive activist of the American socialists' "living" Constitution ruling to nullify our RATIFIED Constitution's Bill of Rights, the only social contract from which these people derive any and all of their uebermensch powers, having terms for "good behavior" - NOT for life.

Rehnquist's Court mocks our Bill of Rights, the God-given Rights of We the People affirmed by our Ratified Constitution, furthering their agenda of "compelling State interests" desired by American socialist elites in and near office.

This destruction of our Bill of Rights is nothing but "bad behavior" - SEDITION, for which these outlaws should be impeached and removed from office, forfeiting all future bloateed wages, benefits and allowances. These old men and women are guilty and recidivistic as they again and again create "law" suiting their world view from their protected perch. Stare decisis is their only defense, except that they continue to create even more "compelling State interests" at the expense of our Law of OUR Land.

Despite American citizens' Bill of Rights, this out of control government is defining its own doom. Read our Declaration of Independnece and our Ratified Constitution's Preamble. For 70 years the blackrobes in concert with other politicians have worked to enhance the powers of government clearly prohibited by the only Constitution we have, our Ratified Constitution. "Interpretations" these are not; RULINGS these are. Blackrobes have no Devine Right or earthly lawful authority to "rewrite" our Law of OUR Land any than they do to rewrite the law of gravity.

During this unending islamist Terror War, the conspiring powerful in our government are defining our Republic's doom through their unlawful sedition. Enemies of our RATIFIED Constitution are those we swore oaths to defend against.

Will all the ex-military men and women in the metastasizing Arabesque layers of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of our government forsake their oaths to defend our Ratified Constitution to become neo-Pretorian Guards defending the "living" powers of this federal government ruling We the People without basis in law?

Our Bill of Rights is not negotiable despite the fact that the gaveling elites tell us that they can over-rule whatever they care to, creating their own "controlling legal authority" instead of our Ratified Constitution.

Sedition by assault gavel.

183 posted on 12/16/2003 9:41:57 AM PST by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ask
Somebody ought to point this out to Mayor Bloomberg. As a contingency plan for a transit strike, and during the blackout, he exhorted New Yorkers to pick up random strangers in their car!
192 posted on 12/18/2003 9:50:35 PM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; george wythe
If the cop has no probable cause, the car does not wreak like pot or anything else and he ask's you if he can search the car than isn't it your right to decline?
193 posted on 01/08/2004 6:16:36 PM PST by DrMrIce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson