Skip to comments.
5-year-old girl safe after trip to drug house
Star-Telegram Dallas Bureau ^
| Nov. 29, 2003
| Mary Mckee
Posted on 11/29/2003 12:40:08 PM PST by Dubya
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: No King but Jesus
I am allowing for the possibility that a stay of 24+ hours in a crack house with a five-year-old girl who wasn't hers, may not have been motivated by crack. She could have bought the crack and returned to her own home, after all.
So there may have been another reason to spend so much time in that house. Other than the reason she gave to the police, I mean. I thought I was being all broad-minded, and here you are getting bent out of shape about it...
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
Comment #23 Removed by Moderator
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator
To: Jim Cane
Like someone else said,either make it legal and do away with the black market or shoot every last one of them that deals drugs.That is the only solution to win the WOD.The only reason drugs are not made legal is they would have to do away with half of the LE's as there would be no justification for their means.People that do drugs are gonna do them no matter the law.People that sell drugs are gonna sell no matter the law unless there was no profit in it.The WOD is like fighting Jihadist,you gotta kill em all if you want to win cuz you will never change their mind.
25
posted on
12/01/2003 10:37:30 AM PST
by
eastforker
(Money is the key to justice,just ask any lawyer.)
To: No King but Jesus
You asked "Do you think crack users go to crack houses for the ambience?"
Crack users GO to crack houses for the crack.
They STAY for at crack houses for days at a time for any number of reasons, one of which could be that they find the ambience very much to their liking.
The other possible reasons are much less positive.
To: No King but Jesus
Unless "ambience" can mean ANYTHING,Well, it can. What establishes a mood, atmosphere, or environment? Anything you can imagine, that's what.
To: Dubya
 |
"Provide evidence for your claim" "Provide evidence for your claim" "Provide evidence for your claim" "Provide evidence for your claim" "Provide evidence for your claim" "Provide evidence for your claim" "Provide evidence for your claim" "Provide evidence for your claim" "Provide evidence for your claim" "Provide evidence for your claim"
|
28
posted on
12/01/2003 11:02:24 AM PST
by
Skooz
(We keep you alive to serve this ship. Row well, and live.)
To: Cultural Jihad
Excellent post.
To: petercooper
They probably don't know, too stoned to remember.
To: walford
What's next, grief counseling?
To: Old Professer
nice try...
32
posted on
12/02/2003 12:49:56 PM PST
by
walford
(Dogmatism swings both ways)
To: walford
Cute. Sometimes they're fun to play with though. That's why I love the ZOT threads. Of course, there are many threads where they are not welcome, such as Terri's party threads. Thanks for the link.
33
posted on
12/05/2003 1:59:13 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
(Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson