Skip to comments.
The man who solved the Kennedy assassination
salon.com ^
| Nov. 22, 2003
| David Talbot
Posted on 11/26/2003 7:13:20 PM PST by Destro
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-138 last
To: Shooter 2.5
You dismiss contradictory evidence while latching on to evidence that supports what you think happened. For example,
1. You believe that only two people thought shots were coming from the GK. This even underestimates the number reported by most (if not all) "LHO, acting alone" theorists. It is much lower than credible statistics compiled on this issue by non- establishment sources;
2. You act as if the only way for someone to behave as if shots came from the GK is to rush toward the GK in hot pursuit of an armed gunman.
3. You act as if reliance on the Parkland doctors, to the exclusion of all other evidence, would lead an unbiased investigator to conclude that no shots were coming from the front. If so, you are the only person to (mis)construe the weight of the evidence from the Parkland doctors in this manner, to my knowledge.
4. The photo I saw in a book was photo number "07" at the link below that is captioned: View showing right side of head: entry wound in right temple.
HTTP = "http://www.jfklancer.com/aphotos.html"/a>click here My feeble attempt at HTML isn't working. The address is:
www.jfklancer.com/aphotos.html
121
posted on
11/28/2003 12:47:55 PM PST
by
Deuce
To: Deuce; Shooter 2.5
I'm confused--Photo 4 in your links shows an exit wound towards the front right.
Photo 7 seems to show a rear right head exit wound...what's up with that?
122
posted on
11/28/2003 3:15:56 PM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
I'm confused--Photo 4 in your links shows an exit wound towards the front right. Photo 7 seems to show a rear right head exit wound...what's up with that? I'm also confused. However, I can tell for sure that photo 07 is JFK.
Also, there could have been both. The more shots, the easier it is to explain all of the wounds on two men plus the missed shot plus the damage on the limo that was quickly destroyed rather than preserved.
123
posted on
11/28/2003 5:55:14 PM PST
by
Deuce
To: Deuce
Ok-but you saw what I saw also, right? Two sets of photos that indicate different head wounds?
124
posted on
11/28/2003 6:22:50 PM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Deuce
125
posted on
11/28/2003 6:44:00 PM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Shooter 2.5
http://jfkassassination.net/earwitnesses.htm A perfect example of your extreme bias. McAdams, a virulent "LHO Alone" theorist tabulates about 30 ear-witnesses that heard shots from the GK. You, somehow represent there were but 2.
126
posted on
11/28/2003 7:33:41 PM PST
by
Deuce
To: Deuce
I only went by what the chart said. It is possible that the third vertical column on the chart, which is impossible to read by me, could be attributed to the knoll.
127
posted on
11/28/2003 8:05:59 PM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Destro
Thanks for your reply. I suppose I should have been more specific in my first post. All I meant to say was that the Japanese swastikas on the map you posted are not the same as the swastikas that are on the Nazi flag. The ends point in different directions.
I said what I did because in my Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary (admittedly an old one) under the word "Swastika", the only image is that of the Nazi swastika. There is none of the Japanese or far eastern swastika.
I guess the answer to all this is that both symbols can be called swastikas, just like Yugos and Mercedes can both be called automobiles.
128
posted on
12/03/2003 10:18:26 AM PST
by
Pearman
To: jordan8
Yeah, Blakey never impressed me either. He was merely the Establishment' s man put forth to answer the ever-growing public suspicion of conspiracy, as if to say, "OK, we'll admit this much" a good 14 years or so after the whitewashed Warren Commission Report. I, too, believe that some regional divisions of "the Mob" had motive means and opportunity to pull off the JFK assassination, but where Blakey's scenario falls apart is that "the Mob" could not have started putting a cover-up in place just minutes after the killing. There's enough hanky-panky just in the Parkland Autopsy, with menacing government men standing around, interfering with the doctors at every turn, directing them to do this and not that, to involve at least ONE other authority figure in the cover-up. Let's start with J. Edgar Hoover, for openers. Carlos Marcello and Santos Trafficante would have no influence on such procedures.
To: MAWG
No, he was on first!
To: Destro
I admit it. I killed JFK.
And I would have gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for those kids!
131
posted on
12/18/2003 3:27:01 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(A poem, by Lazamataz: "What do we do with Saddam, Now that we gottim?")
To: Lazamataz
It was you I saw on the grassy knoll wasn't it?
I had a feeling all along that it was you but it was so long ago and your apperance has changed some.......
132
posted on
12/18/2003 3:31:26 PM PST
by
The Mayor
(If God could Vote, he would vote with the Right wing conspiracy)
To: Shooter 2.5
Every one in Dealy Plaza was looking, pointing or running toward the grassy knoll. Even the police ran toward the grassy knoll. Abraham Zuperder said he thought a sound of a shot came from his right. The people on the fifth floor said they saw people running toward the RR yard and parking lot, so they went to the west windows. Later they testified at the WC that they heard the shots above them and heard the shell casings hitting the floor above them.Its obvious that they didn't realize that then or why would they have run to the west windows. The people who testified before the WC that were supportive of the lone gunman were obviously coached and WC questions directed toward them were grossly leading questions!
To: The Mayor
It was you I saw on the grassy knoll wasn't it?Yes. I was the smear towards the north.
I had a feeling all along that it was you but it was so long ago and your apperance has changed some.......
Well I *was* an unviable tissue mass then.
134
posted on
12/18/2003 5:35:13 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(A poem, by Lazamataz: "What do we do with Saddam, Now that we gottim?")
To: Lazamataz
Well I *was* an unviable tissue mass then.Well your apperance has definitley changed..
135
posted on
12/18/2003 5:38:58 PM PST
by
The Mayor
(If God could Vote, he would vote with the Right wing conspiracy)
To: The Mayor
No, I still pretty much look like an unviable tissue mass.
I get a lot of strange looks when driving.
136
posted on
12/18/2003 5:42:20 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(A poem, by Lazamataz: "What do we do with Saddam, Now that we gottim?")
To: Shooter 2.5
Thar ya go! That link makes it offical!
To: Lazamataz
JFK deserved it-he was a lefty....
138
posted on
12/18/2003 8:55:17 PM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-138 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson