Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JFK conspiracy theory 101 - a lesson in ambiguity
Reuters ^ | Fri 21 November, 2003 | Jon Herskovitz

Posted on 11/20/2003 8:04:12 PM PST by yonif

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: kellynla
Kennedy was not shot in the back of the head. He was shot in the his right front forehead which blew out the back of his head...

I don't want to start whipping this 'dead horse' again and start a whole big discussion but there is no evidence for that conjecture. I used to think the same thing but after looking closely at the Zapruder film and autopsy photos...I can't support it.

Well we're only fifteen minutes into the ABC program and they conveniently omitted the fact that the top of Kennedy's head was blown clear out and from the right front.

I thought that as well and figured that we were going to get a typical Jennings hand job...but it did come in the second half of the program.

41 posted on 11/21/2003 7:21:50 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (I have opinions of my own - strong opinions - but I don't always agree with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
But when they do, there's no room left to wiggle. Oswald, three shots, from the sixth floor of the Depository. It's the only possibility.

Agreed. I used to be a big multiple shooter theory supporter. But now...not so much.

42 posted on 11/21/2003 7:23:51 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (I have opinions of my own - strong opinions - but I don't always agree with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: neb52
I never heard it before! It's really fitting too.
43 posted on 11/21/2003 7:25:00 AM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LouD
" you tell me if it sounds like a "popping noise," okay? "

Hey, don't ask me, you need to direct that to someone that was standing there.

Ummm, that would be WC witness Arnold Rowland.

Posner strongly attacks Rowland's credibility (6:229-230), but time and time again Rowland proved himself to be a careful observer and a credible witness--not a perfect witness, but a credible one. According to Posner, Rowland said the crowds started to laugh after the first shot. "No one else," says Posner, "reported such a reaction" (6:230). But this is not really what Rowland reported, as Posner surely should have gathered from reading Rowland's testimony. What Rowland said was that many of the people around him started to laugh, or "chuckle," at the sound of the first shot because they mistook it for a firecracker or something (2 H 179). Rowland added that the only bystanders who did this were those who couldn't see the motorcade. It is a well-known fact that many witnesses did indeed mistake the first shot for a firecracker.

That is straight from the Warran Commision Report and Posner (author, "Case Closed")

Without being able to see anything that would alter the initial interpretation of what they heard, most thought they heard a firecracker.

TLI

44 posted on 11/21/2003 10:05:16 PM PST by TLI (...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Echos. An equal number of people, if not more, were pointing to the sixth floor of the depository.

Well, that would make sense considering there were probably three shooters.

TLI

45 posted on 11/21/2003 10:09:24 PM PST by TLI (...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Its the reason that the first place authorities ran to the 6th story window was because so many people saw the rifle sticking out of the window. Futhermore, the TX governor is clearly turned to look over his right shoulder because he heard the shots coming from behind him, a fact he states and its shown on the Zapruder film.
46 posted on 11/24/2003 10:25:38 PM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson