Skip to comments.
Terri's Fight - (Daily Thread/Updates) November 5 -7, 2003
Various
| November 5, 2003
| sweetliberty
Posted on 11/05/2003 12:14:25 AM PST by sweetliberty
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660, 661-680, 681-700 ... 1,201-1,216 next last
To: Saundra Duffy
Your post 466. Thank you.
661
posted on
11/06/2003 6:50:58 PM PST
by
Robert Drobot
(God, family, country. All else is meaningless.)
To: Pegita
sheesh.....
Merchants of Death??
that Terri might know again the beauty and love of her caring family...she is PVS, if you would quit the bibliobabble, you would probably help her more...
just shaking my head
To: sweetliberty
I wonder if Terri's parents cancelled or if King cancelled!
Would anyone know?
MCD
663
posted on
11/06/2003 6:56:29 PM PST
by
MSCASEY
To: Graymatter
Abrams report just had a few minutes with Pat Anderson and George Felos. She got her points in, about lack of therapy and care. Felos said MS has been a "model husband," and that the court dispute between Schindlers and MS was now "over." (She corrected that!)
To: cyn
ping to 634
665
posted on
11/06/2003 7:02:30 PM PST
by
tutstar
To: Graymatter; sweetliberty
Model Husband:
1. Prevents wife from receiving appropriate rehab/medical care.
2. Isolates wife from her family and friends.
3. Spends her money on lawsuits rather than for rehab/medical care.
4. Commits adultery.
5. Fathers illegitimate children.
6. Shacks up with new family....so he's only a pseudo-bigamist.
Did I leave anything out with this "model husband."
To: Krodg
You can always change your comments page to "Brief" instead of "Full" as an interim solution. You can also change your preferences or options to use your own settings instead of defaulting to the settings at the site you are visiting.
To: Legerdemain
Mary Labyak, George Felos and Michael Schiavo ARE merchants of death no better than William T. Sherman (archetect of Southern and Native American genocide) and Adolph Hitler in my book. The same DEVIL guided the five of them and probably guides you too. In fact I used Marching Through Georgia in one of my recently posted song updates to make the Sherman-Satan-Ho$pice of the Florda $uncoa$t connection that is how strongly I believe that Terri's case is a part of a multi generational CONTINUING "Kill and Burn" Culture!!!!
668
posted on
11/06/2003 7:03:56 PM PST
by
Coral Snake
(deathculture(HospiceOf TheFlorida$uncoast == Andersonville + Aushwitz)
To: TaxRelief
Nope...I've killed it.
669
posted on
11/06/2003 7:14:20 PM PST
by
Krodg
To: Coral Snake
FM, God squad sister (or brother)
To: Coral Snake
whatever......and the aliens are coming also...get out the tinfoil
To: nicmarlo
I'm tired and blonde 8^)
in nutshell, Connor told them they didn't file things properly , the courts have previously ruled incorrectly and the Gov will not appear before them because they didn't follow the rules????????
Have i got it?
672
posted on
11/06/2003 7:20:53 PM PST
by
tutstar
To: Coral Snake
Why do we see it so clearly, while others can not?
To: tutstar
Partly, yes. However, as pertains to the judge, the attorney made several VERY IMPORTANT and unusual comments to be addressed to a judge about the judge's order and what the judge's procedures on this matter will be based upon.
The attorney said it very much appears that the judge is preventing Gov. Bush the ability to cross-examine witnesses, obtain discovery so he can properly answer any charges, is allowing "hearsay" into the instant case and, is instead, calling them facts, simply because they were argued/presented in another case, but a case the Governor was not a party to, and, therefore, should not be allowed in AT ALL, unless the Gov. is given the opportunity to refute/admit those facts based on has own discovery; that it appears that the judge has already made up his mind about what "facts" are necessary for him to make a decision.....in essence, the attorney is strongly implying, that the judge is being biased, and by making the decisions he's making, it will be an err in law, not in discretion. An err in law can be appealed. An "err" in discretion cannot.
To: Krodg
"If I strangled her to the point of unconsciousness, her trachea would have been crushed," he said, adding that no physician made notations regarding "marks around her neck," which he said would have been there if the allegation was true. This comment just sounds too cold and calculated to me. "If I had strangled her".? I don't think an innocent, caring person would respond with the lawyeresque type BS. Lying Jack---!
Comment #676 Removed by Moderator
To: Krodg
677
posted on
11/06/2003 7:36:38 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: nicmarlo
And I would think that Felos & gang would not want the Gov's legal team to cross examine....Bush could have access to all previous court records pertaining to Terri?
Does this mean also that the challenge to the constitutionality of Terri's law would be dead?
thanks
678
posted on
11/06/2003 7:36:43 PM PST
by
tutstar
To: patriot40068
Is there anyone in Florida NOT on this board?
To: lonevoice
ROTFL! You're getting good at this.
680
posted on
11/06/2003 7:37:58 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660, 661-680, 681-700 ... 1,201-1,216 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson